Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Town of Superior v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Jefferson, Colorado, The”
ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ challenges in three consolidated cases to the final action of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) approving a land exchange affecting the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge in Colorado. Plaintiff Town of Superior filed its amended complaint on July 19, 2012 alleging violations of the Administrat
Justice HOBBS delivered the Opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari in Colorado Mining Association v. Board of County Commissioners of Summit County, 170 P.3d 749 (Colo.App.2007), to determine whether Colorado's Mined Land Reclamation Act ("the MLRA") preempts an ordinance Summit County adopted, invoking its statutorily-delegated land use authority. Summit County banned the use of toxic or acidic chemical
FOR PUBLICATION FEB 04 2014, 11:47 am ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE TETON CORPORATION: JULIA BLACKWELL GELINAS MAGGIE L. SMITH RICHARD T. MULLINEAUX FROST BROWN TODD, LLC CRYSTAL G. ROWE Indianapolis, Indiana KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP New Albany, Indiana
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
59 F.Supp.2d 1101 (1999) SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., d/b/a Sprint PCS, James T. Grosvenor and Sharon Grosvenor, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, Colorado, and the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 97-WM-1246. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 4, 1999. *1102
Opinion by Judge CASEBOLT. This declaratory judgment action involves interpretation of a constitutional amendment that created the City and County of Broom-field. Plaintiffs, the Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County, the Jefferson County Assessor, and the Jefferson County Treasurer (collectively Jefferson County), appeal the judgment in favor of defendant, the City and County of Broomfield, the s
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
Board of Commissioners v. Teton Corp.public domain
OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. The Board of Commissioners of Jefferson County ("Jefferson County") appeals the Seott Circuit Court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Teton Corporation, Innovative Roofing Solutions, Inc., Gutap-fel Roofing Inc., and Daniel L. Gutapfel {collectively "the Appellees"). The trial court determined that Jefferson County waived its right to subrogate damages pursuant to the terms of t
Board of Commissioners v. Teton Corp.public domain
OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. The Board of Commissioners of Jefferson County (“Jefferson County”) appeals the Scott Circuit Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Teton Corporation, Innovative Roofing Solutions, Inc., Gutap-fel Roofing Inc., and Daniel L. Gutapfel (collectively “the' Appellees”). The trial court determined that Jefferson County waived its right to subrogate damages pursuant to the terms of
PER CURIAM. In this original proceeding, we are required to review the finalized Reapportionment Plan ("Adopted Plan") submitted by the Colorado Reapportionment Commission ("Commission") to determine whether the Adopted Plan complies with article V, see-tions 46 and 47 of the Colorado Constitution. Colo. Const. art. V, § 48(1)(e). We hold that the Adopted Plan is not sufficiently attentive to county boundaries to meet the re
Donald Burns v. Town of Palm Beachpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 18-14515 Date Filed: 06/08/2021 Page: 1 of 136 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14515 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cv-81152-BB DONALD BURNS,
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 5431694 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Department of Revenue, Finance and Administration Cabinet v. The Solomon Foundation, Inc.public domain
RENDERED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2025 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2023-SC-0235-DG BILL DUNN, MCCRACKEN COUNTY APPELLANT PROPERTY VALUATION ADMINISTRATOR ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2022-CA-0399 MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT NO. 21-CI-00191 SOLOMON FOUNDATION; AND APPELLEES K
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Opinion by JUDGE DUNN {1 No doubt Colorado is a state blessed with natural beauty. Seeking, in their view, to highlight this beauty, several years ago artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude began a quest to install a large-scale art display over the Arkansas River (the Project). Over a decade after the initial application, the Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor Reere-ation (Parks Division), through its Board,
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
ACCEPTED 15-24-00114-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/29/2025 4:59 PM No. 15-24-00114-CV CHRI
KIRSHBAUM, Justice. This case presents questions concerning the respective responsibilities of the Colorado Department of Social Services (the Department), the General Assembly, and county governments to fund public assistance programs established by the Colorado Social Services Code, sections 26-1-101 to 26-15-113, 11 C.R.S. (1982 & 1984 Supp.) (the Code).1 The case arose when the Department s
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV