Cases

In May of 1992, the appellant, Torriano Carroll, was convicted of felony murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. This court affirmed his conviction without opinion on March 26, 1993, 618 So.2d 144, and issued a certificate of judgment on April 13, 1993. More than three years later, on August 6, 1996, the appellant filed a Rule 32 petition alleging 1) that the prosecutor had failed to produce information in discovery and 2) that there was newly discovered evidence. With reference to

327 F.Supp.2d 1049 (2003) MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. James MENKING, Defendant and Cross-Claimant, and Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare Plan, Defendant and Cross-Claimant. Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare Plan, Plaintiff, v. James Menking and Mid-Century Insurance Company, Defendants. Nos. 8:02CV267, 8:02CV455.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for perjury in the first degree based on the fourth count of the indictment, which charged defendant with falsely testifying that "LaMarr Scott shot Torriano Jackson.” Although defendant did not use the exact words charged in the indictment, *966the evidence established that defen

[Cite as State v. Chandler, 2013-Ohio-2903.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98866 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

ORDER ALLEGRA, Judge: This military pay case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under RCFC 12(b)(1). For the following reasons, the court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART, defendant’s motion. I. A brief recitation of the facts provides necessary context.1 Nathaniel Gay (p

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. *386 This case concerns the "actual innocence" gateway to federal habeas review applied in Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298

613 F.Supp.2d 330 (2009) Valentino DIXON, Petitioner, v. James T. CONWAY, Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 05-CV-208. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 5, 2009. *332 James Ostrowski, Buffalo, NY, for Petitioner. J. Michael Marion, Buffalo, NY, for Respondent. OR

Depue, J. The action on the case, in the nature of waste, has almost entirely superseded the common law action of waste, as well for permissive as for voluntary waste, as furnishing a more easy and expeditious remedy than a writ of waste. It is also an action encouraged by the courts, the recovery being confined to single damages, and not being accompanied by a forfeiture of the place wasted. At common law, was

By the Court. * —Daly, Chief Justice.—Ainong the risks-insured against was barratry of the master and mariners, and the question presented in the case is, whether the ninety bales of cotton were lost through an act which the law would denominate barratry on the part of the master. These ninety bales were stowed upon deck, and were jettisoned in a storm. They were a part of 202 bales c