Cases

OPINION ZAMORA, Judge. {1} Appellee’s motion for rehearing is granted. The opinion filed in this case on June 20, 2016, is withdrawn and this Opinion is substituted in its place. {2} In this consolidated appeal, Defendants Mic

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Tracie Wilson, Defendant Below, Petitioner FILED February 11, 2019 vs) No. 18-0156 (Kanawha County 15-C-1624) EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME

[Cite as State v. Maxwell, 2020-Ohio-3027.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 107758 v. : CHARLES MAXWELL, :

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: JUNE 20, 2016 4 5 NOS. 33,280 & 33,279 (Consolidated) 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8 v. 9 STEVEN MAXWELL, 10 Defendant-Appellant, 11 and 12 MICHAEL MAXWELL, 13 Defendant-Appellant. 14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 15 Mary L. Marlowe Sommer, District Judge 16 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 17 Santa Fe, NM 18 Tonya Noo

ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This case stems from a contested adoption suit that was filed in Prentiss County Chancery Court between paternal grandparents, Steven Beard and Jackie Elaine Beard, and paternal great-grandparents, Eugene Berryman and Patsy Ber-ryman. On November 17, 2011, the biological parents of minor twins, N.B. and *222K.B.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00844-SCT BENARDRICK C. McKINNEY v. KASEY HAMP DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/21/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WATOSA MARSHALL SANDERS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: STEPHANIE NICOLE MORRIS TONYA YEVETTE POWELL DALANEY LEE MECHAM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: TUNICA COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: TONYA YEVETTE POWELL

385 S.C. 643 (2009) 685 S.E.2d 814 Ex Parte David G. CANNON, Appellant, Ex Parte Georgia Attorney General's Office; South Carolina Attorney General's Office; Terry Brown, Romunzo Brown, Forlando Brown, Darren Lumar; M&T Bank; Tommie Rae Hynie Brown; Stephen L. Slotchiver, the GAL of James Brown, II; Larry Brown, Daryl Brown (individually and on behalf of his minor children Lindsey Delores Brown and Janise Vanisha Brown), V

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING Fina urges that this Court erred in reversing and rendering judgment that it take nothing. Fina contents that the doctrine of election of remedies is not applicable and, therefore, a judgment based on reformation of the letter of credit should have been entered. See TEX.R.CIV.P. 434. We disagree with Fina’s contention regarding the inapplicability of the doctrine of election of remedies. Howev

MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Caleb Corrothers was convicted of two counts of capital murder and one count of aggravated assault. For the two capital-murder convictions, he received the death penalty. Corrothers appealed, and this Court affirmed his conviction and death sentence. 1 Corrothers now petit

[Cite as Shepard's Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. Sigmon, 2014-Ohio-4367.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SHEPARD'S MOBILE HOME PARK, LTD., : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellant : Hon

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION MARCIA G. COOKE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before me on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. (ECF No. 3). Plaintiff filed his Response to the Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 17) and Defendant filed its Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 24). Therefore Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitr

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In March 2009, the Hinds County Circuit Court ordered Tonya Melton, Charles David Melton Jr., Paula Dawn Harris, and James Kendall Harris (the Meltons) to execute documents settling their personal-injury lawsuit against Smith’s Pecans. The Meltons refused to comply and, after Smith’s Pecans moved for contempt, filed a motion under Mississippi Civil Procedure Rule 60(b) to set

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00401-SCT CALEB CORROTHERS a/k/a CALEB CARROTHERS a/k/a CALBE CAROTHER a/k/a CALEB L. CARROTHERS a/k/a CALEB COROTHERS a/k/a CALAB CAROTHES v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/09/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GRADY FRANKLIN TOLLISON, III TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: TREASURE R. TYSON SUE ANN WERRE CHARL

111 F.3d 597 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Demetrius JONES, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.William Yancey JONES, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Kevin PLEAS, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Demetrius MACK, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Sherdonna JONES, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Tonya JONES, A

[Cite as State ex rel. J.R. v. Jones, 2022-Ohio-4642.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL., J.R., : Relator, : No. 111819 v. : THE HONORABLE TON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00838-SCT S.D.P. AND I.T.A. v. HARRISON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES, BY MARCUS D. DAVENPORT, AND I.T.A., JR., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND, MARCUS D. DAVENPORT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/21/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MICHAEL BRYAN DICKINSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: FRANCES PASSMAN YEATTS

[Cite as State v. O'Leary, 2016-Ohio-8095.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 13-16-14 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. TERRY L. O'LEARY, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 13-

431 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2006) Aaron SAXTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TITLE MAX OF ALABAMA, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 2:04 CV 2579 RDP. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 4, 2006. James R. Mulroy, II, Lewis Fisher Henderson Claxton & Mulroy, LLP, for The defendant's counsel. Kirby D. Farris, Farris Riley & Pitt LLP, Birmin

WYNN, Judge concurring in the result. I write separately to emphasize that judicial restraint guides our interpretation of the affirmative defense to product liability codified in N.C.G.S. § 99B-3 (“the modification defense”). Here, the language of the statute is clear and we are duty-bound to follow the law as written. Nonetheless, while I concur with the majority in following the clear language of the statut

RULING AND ORDER JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Doc. 52)1 filed by Plaintiffs William and Beverly Vatter, the surviving parents of Karen Chester, and Plaintiffs Tonya Carmen and Mark Chester, the s