Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Tony Thomas v. Tarry Williams”
Tony Thomas v. Tarry Williamspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 14‐2610 TONY THOMAS, Petitioner‐Appellant, v. TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden of the Stateville Correctional Center, Respondent‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the U
Thomas v. Williamspublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Tony Thomas of the 2001 murder of Khatim Shakir. In January 2005, after his conviction was final, Thomas received a letter from his trial attorney informing him that unidentified gang members told police that Thomas did not commit the murder, but rather, that the shooter was a drug dealer named Robert Pinkston. In April 2005, Thomas filed a petition for post-convicti
Eric Blackmon v. Tarry Williamspublic domain
*1108POSNER, Circuit Judge, concurring and dissenting. I agree with the decision to remand this case, but not with the majority’s treatment of two critical potential witnesses for the petitioner, witnesses whom his lawyer failed to interview (or, so far as appears, failed even to attempt to interview), and by failing
State of Tennessee v. Tony E. Cannon, Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 22, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TONY E. CANNON, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County No. S0600080 Robert Crigler, Judge No. M2007-00557-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 19, 2008 A Lincoln County Circuit Court jury convicted the defendant, Tony E. Canno
Moseley v. Brankerpublic domain
550 F.3d 312 (2008) Carl Stephen MOSELEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gerald J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina; North Carolina Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 07-17. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: September 23, 2008. Decided: November 3, 2008. Decided on Rehearing: December 17, 2008.<
State v. Bankspublic domain
271 S.W.3d 90 (2008) STATE of Tennessee v. Devin BANKS. No. W2005-02213-SC-DDT-DD Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 4, 2008 Session. November 7, 2008. *106 Robert Jones, Shelby County Public Defender; Phyllis Aluko and Tony N. Brayton, Assistant Public Defenders (on appeal); Kathy Kent and Latonya Bu
City of Houston v. Randall Kallinenpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-12-00050-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/9/2015 5:34:23 PM
Campbell v. Cellco Partnershippublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Patrick “Tony” Campbell brings this diversity action against Célico Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Inc. (hereinafter “Verizon”),1 alleging claims of racial discrimination and retaliation under the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”)2 a
Moseley v. Brankerpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CARL STEPHEN MOSELEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, No. 07-17 Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina; NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Caro
Reinhart v. Youngpublic domain
906 S.W.2d 471 (1995) Thelma REINHART & Sallye Treme, Petitioners, v. William Carl YOUNG, Respondent. No. 94-0734. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued January 18, 1995. Decided June 15, 1995. Rex Easley, Victoria, for petitioners. Clifford J. Vacek and Jeffrey Lee Hoffman, Houston, for respondent. ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERR
Farris v. Moeckelpublic domain
664 F.Supp. 881 (1987) Calbert F. FARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Dennis MOECKEL, Heavy Howlett, John Does 1-10, Benny Padilla, individually and as the Sheriff of McKinley County, New Mexico, the Board of Commissioners of McKinley County, New Mexico, W. Thomas Bowers, John Does 11-15, Clayton Police Department, the Town Council of Clayton, Delaware, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 85-621-JJF. United States District Cour
Labauve v. Olin Corp.public domain
ORDER STEELE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (doc. 119). *637The Motion has been exhaustively litigated, as the parties have submitted more than 200 pages of briefs and over 800 exhibits in support of their respective positions. The parties also presented live testimony and argument in
Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc.public domain
866 F.Supp. 1481 (1994) DANA CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 3:92-CV-581RM. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. October 24, 1994. *1482 *1483 *1484
In Re Petition of American Historical Ass'npublic domain
49 F.Supp.2d 274 (1999) In re Petition of AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, American Society of Legal History, Organization of American Historians and Society of American Archivists for Order Directing Release of Grand Jury Minutes. No. M-11-189 (PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 13, 1999. *275
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams