Cases

637 F.Supp.2d 406 (2009) Carol A. TOBIN, Individually and as the Special Administratrix of the Estate of William F. Tobin, Meggan Van Ness, and Kelly Bear, Plaintiffs, v. AMR CORPORATION, American Airlines, Inc., and American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:08-cv-00697-M. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. July 8, 2009.

263 P.3d 835 (2011) J.A. TOBIN CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellant, v. Sherman F. WILLIAMS, III, and Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS., Appellees. No. 104,458. Court of Appeals of Kansas. September 9, 2011. *836 Donald M. McLean, of Kansas City, for appellant. *837 Pat

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, United States District Judge Defendants Holland & Knight, LLP (“H&K”) and Richard J. Hindlian (“Hindli-an”) (collectively, “defendants”) move for summary judgment on plaintiffs claim of legal malpractice brought in his capacity as Bankruptcy Trustee, of the Estate of Inofin, Incorporated. Defendants also move to strike the deposition testimony of Michael Cuomo. For t

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by defendants Joan F. Tobin (“Tobin”) and Howard N. Ellman (“Ellman”) and a cross-appeal by plaintiff Charles W. Dwight, III (“Dwight”) from various orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida stemming from a multimillion dollar civil suit involving a number of real estate partnerships in Colorad

319 B.R. 553 (2005) In re S.M. ACQUISITION CO., d/b/a Stylemaster, Inc., Debtor. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Plaintiff, v. Matrix IV, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02 B 10723. Adversary No. 02 A 00283. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 13, 2005. *554 Shaw Gussi

624 N.W.2d 548 (2001) 244 Mich. App. 626 Janet TOBIN, as personal representative of the Estate of Rollin Tobin, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL, a Michigan hospital corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 210536. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted September 19, 2000, at Detroit. Decided February 16, 2001 at

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 31 200

296 B.R. 452 (2003) In re S.M. ACQUISITION CO., d/b/a Stylemaster, Inc., Debtor. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Plaintiff, v. Matrix IV, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02 B 10723, Adversary No. 02 A 00283. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 4, 2003. *453

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3511 WILLIAM B. SHIPLEY, NINA MARIE, and KATHERINE WUTHRICH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHICAGO BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS and JAMES M. SCANLON, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3511 WILLIAM B. SHIPLEY, NINA MARIE, and KATHERINE WUTHRICH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHICAGO BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS and JAMES M. SCANLON, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3511 WILLIAM B. SHIPLEY, NINA MARIE, and KATHERINE WUTHRICH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHICAGO BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS and JAMES M. SCANLON, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

485 F.Supp.2d 969 (2007) Lita FILIPPO, Plaintiff, v. LEE PUBLICATIONS, INC., a subsidiary of Lee Enterprises, d/b/a The Times, Defendant. No. 2:05 CV 64. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. April 30, 2007. *970 Mark T. Van Der Molen, Attorney at Law, Merrillville, IN, for Plaintiff. Charles D. Tob

639 F.Supp.2d 1217 (2008) COBRA NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, d/b/a Pyrolance North America, Plaintiff, v. COLD CUT SYSTEMS SVENSKA AB, a Swedish company, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-cv-00873-DME-CBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 11, 2008. *1220 Tobin Duff Kern, David N. Schac

WILSON, Circuit Judge: Fishman & Tobin (“Fishman”) and Mac-Clenny Products (“MaeClenny”), two manufacturers that ship clothing from the Caribbean to the United States, appeal the amount of judgment awarded to them when a carrier lost their cargo at sea. In resolving their dispute, this Court for the fourth time enters the murky waters of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: This case arises from the district court’s denial of co-defendants Ronald Tobin’s and Clifford Aekerson’s motions to suppress evidence seized in a search of Ackerson’s home, garage, and a station wagon parked in the garage. A panel of this Court reversed the district court’s finding that the search was permissible under the Fourth Amendment and held that Ackerson’s motion should have been granted. T

CLARK, Circuit Judge: In these appeals we face the difficult task of further defining the parameters of the Fourth Amendment. Both appellants, Ronald Tobin and Clifford Ackerson, appeal the denial of their motions to suppress evidence seized at Ackerson’s home on March 19, 1986. We find that Tobin lacks standing to challenge either the search of Ackerson’s home and garage or the

963 N.E.2d 534 (2012) IN RE INDIANA NEWSPAPERS INC., d/b/a the Indianapolis Star, Appellant-Non-Party, Jeffrey M. Miller & Cynthia S. Miller, Appellees-Plaintiffs, v. Junior Achievement of Central Indiana, Inc.; Jennifer Burk, Individually and in her Official Capacity; Central Indiana Community Foundation, Inc.; Brian Payne, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-1103-PL-234.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Whittaker Construction, Incorporated (Whittaker) appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment (judgment) entered, after a non-jury trial in this breach of contract action, in favor of A & O Development Co. (A & O) on both A & O’s claim and Whittaker’s counterclaim. On appeal, Whittaker only challenges part of the damages awarded to A &

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: In this civil rights case, Appellants Edmund Holmberg (“Holmberg”) and Douglas McClish (“McClish”) appeal from the district court’s entry of final summary judgment for Appellees Deputy Shawn Terry, Deputy Christopher Calderone, and Sheriff Richard B. Nugent, all of the Her-nando County, Florida Sheriffs Office. After thorough review, we affirm the district court’s determination that Deputy Terry was e

By the Court. After final decree in this case, and within the time allowed by the rules of this court to file a petition for rehearing, appellant has filed a motion to be allowed costs, because the question upon which the case has been finally disposed of was not raised at the argument of the demurrer at the May term, 1883, of the court below, when the appellant’s legal remedy still existed; but on the contrary, was raised at t