Cases

OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: Patrolling in international waters, the United States Coast Guard suspected the crew of an Ecuadorian fishing boat of illicit activities. With the authorization of Ecuadorian authorities, the Coast Guard boarded the boat, searched for drugs, and towed the boat to Ecuador. The Ecuadorian crew, who are Plaintiffs here, allege

639 F.3d 1191 (2011) Oswaldo Enrique TOBAR; Rosa Carmelina Zambrano Lucas; Junior Ivan Pico Alava; Segundo Matias Zambrano Alonzo; Francisco Gabriel Yole Arteago; Fausto Lupercio Arias Castaneda; Frabricio Bayron Cedeno; Joffre Johnny Cedeno Cedeno; Lindon Cleofe Cedeno Cedeno; Ramon Eliades Ramon Velez Cedeno; Daniel David Quimi Chalen; Pablo Eduardo Lucas Conforme; Ramon Eduardo Pilligua Conforme; Ciro Mariano Lopez *1192<

696 F.Supp.2d 1373 (2009) Monica Rico TOBAR, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action No. CV208-057. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division. September 21, 2009. *1374 Ashleigh Ruth Madison, Savage, Turner, Pinson & Karsman, PC, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff. James L. Coursey

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

535 U.S. 908 TOBARv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-7977. Supreme Court of the United States. March 4, 2002. 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Fed. Appx. 75.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1655 ___________________________ United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee v. Luis A. Tobar, Def

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Amado Tobar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Tobar has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected the

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hugo Rolando Tobar-Campos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Aln/cn-*192darez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. <

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM. Pro se appellant Carlos Tobar appeals a district court order that denied his motion for sentence modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, as amended by U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, supp. to app. C, Amendment 635 (2001). Assuming that the ten-day appeal period in Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A) controls,

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

SUMMARY ORDER This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was submitted by counsel. ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed. Defendant Simon Eduardo Tobar appeals from a judgment entered in the United State

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Petitioners Miriam Judith Tobar, Jose Manuel Espinoza, and Adriana Espinoza Morales are Mexican citizens who face removal from this country. Petitioners seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. Petitioners claim we have jurisdiction under the REAL ID

Case: 21-60875 Document: 00516704908 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

841 F.2d 1120 U.S.v.Jailer Tobar-Perea NO. 87-3594 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. FEB 29, 1988 Appeal From: D.Del., Roth, J. 1 AFFIRMED.

MAGILL, Circuit Judge. Yasmin Shoaira and Hesham Gawdat Tobar petition for review of separate decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying their applications for asylum and withholding of removal. I. A. Factual Background Shoaira and Tobar are a wife and husband who seek asylum in the United Stat

MAASSEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A hotel housekeeper injured her back while lifting a pile of linens. Her employer controverted benefits based on an examining doctor's opinion that she was medically stable and that the job injury was no longer the substantial cause of any disability or need for *749medical tre

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben Tovar Balleza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tovar Balleza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re