Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Tiwana S. Robinson”
Singh v. Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RANJIT SINGH, No. 23-2065 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-587-181 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the
State v. Yorkpublic domain
MOORE, J. BA jury rendered a responsive verdict against the defendant of guilty to one count of attempted aggravated rape of his mentally handicapped sister-in-law, Y.P., and guilty as charged of aggravated rape of R.Y., his five-year-old daughter. He was sentenced to fifty years without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence for the attempted aggravated rape conviction to run consecutively to a mandatory
PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice. I, Petitioner Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission (“the Commission”) has filed with this court its final findings, conclusions, and recommendation, pursuant to Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission Rule 12(A) (2009), in which it recommends that this court remove respondent the Honorable Willard Proctor, Jr., from the office of Circuit Judge o
Muhammad v. Williamson-Crawlpublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.
Muhammad v. Williamson-Crawlpublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.