Cases

Appeal by the mother from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Barbara Salinitro, J.), dated May 6, 2015. The order, after a combined permanency and disposi-tional hearing, inter alia, placed the subject child in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services and placed the mother under supervision by a child protective agency, social services official, or duly authorized agency until the

ROBINSON, J. ¶ 1. This case comes to us after a lengthy bench trial between appellants/cross-appellees Kneebinding, Inc. (Kneebinding) and Kneebinding company directors John and Tina Springer-Miller (the Springer-Millers), and appellee/cross-appellant Richard Howell (Howell) that resulted in a series of interlocutory decisions before final judgment. Kneebinding and the Springer-Millers

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3174 ___________________________ Tina Jimerson Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction Defendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 18-2873 ______

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0218p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TINA ZAI, individually and as a Trustee of her │

Rumsey, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Madison County (Revoir, J.), entered March 15, 2016, which, in three proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, among other things, sanctioned petitioner. Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are the parents of three chi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2026 Term FILED May 15, 2026 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUP

Matter of Park v Miller (2020 NY Slip Op 01802) Matter of Park v Miller 2020 NY Slip Op 01802 Decided on March 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

KITE, Justice. [¶1] William Cossey Miller claims the district court erred by revoking his probation because there was no showing that his violations of the probation conditions were wiliful. We conclude the record supports the district court's decision and affirm. ISSUE [¶2] Mr. Miller states the issue on appeal as: Did the court commit reversible error by fail

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Tina Johnson filed this products liability suit against generic and brand-name manufacturers of the prescription drug meto-clopramide. Johnson alleges that her long-term use of generic metoclopramide caused her to develop a neurological disorder known as tardive dyskinesia, and that manufacturers provided misleading and inadequate warnings as to the risks associated with long-term use of the drug. T

WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: Tina Esperanza, Reigge Edward, Asha Asharafan, and Lesly Briggs (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York law against the City of New York (the "City"); New York City Police Department ("NYPD") Officers Nina McKenzie,

KATHERINE B. FORREST, United States District Judge Each week, to ensure a more secure future, employees throughout the United States contribute portions of their paychecks to retirement savings accounts. An employer sponsoring a retirement plan becomes a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Savings Act ("ERISA") and is required to act vis-à-vis a plan with the care, skill, and diligence that a prudent person would use in a

*635 WIGGINS, Justice. An employee successfully obtained a judgment against her employer for prospective injunctive relief under the self-care provision of the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The district court entered a judgment awarding the employee attorney fees and costs. The State appeals. We hold s

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 12–2055 Filed March 28, 2014 TINA LEE, Appellee, vs. STATE OF IOWA and POLK COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, James M. Richardson, Judge. Defendants appeal the district court’s remand order that reinstated plaintiff to her former employment and awarded wages and benefits. AFFIRMED. Thomas J.

CADY, Chief Justice. In this employment case, we must primarily decide whether the State of Iowa is immune from claims under the self-care provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in state court. The district court denied the State’s posttrial motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial asserting Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity after a jur

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 579 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-24-246 TINA HORTON Opinion Delivered December 3, 2025 APPEAL FROM SEARCY COUNTY APPELLANT CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 65CR-23-41] V.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00053-COA TINA FRANCO AND RODDY A. VANACOR APPELLANTS v. LINDA A. FERRILL AND CHARLES A. APPELLEES FERRILL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARGARET ALFONSO COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HANCOCK COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR AP

06/11/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 14, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KIMBERLY MILLER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 24831 Stella L. Hargrove, Judge ___________________________________

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiff Adam Miller (“Miller”) brings this action against the New York City *378Department of Education (“DOE”), Olga Livanis, Tina Yu, Julia Cunningham, Kared Rosoff, and Brendan Alfieri (collectively the “defendants”). Plaintiff alleges violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 198

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Parole dated May 22, 2013, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s request to be released on parole, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bartlett, J.), dated January 16, 2014, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Ordered t

256 Wis.2d 80 (2002) 2002 WI App 150 647 N.W.2d 348 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Tina M. MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 01-1993-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs February 12, 2002. Decided May 2, 2002. *82 On beha