Cases

OPINION Tracy Christopher, Justice In this appeal from the denial of a pretrial writ of habeas corpus, we consider a facial challenge to the constitutionality of Section 32.51 of the Texas Penal Code. We conclude that the challenged statute, which was enacted to combat identity theft, is not unconstitutional on its face. We therefore affirm the trial cou

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 22, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-11-00939-CR ____________ TINA CHRISTINE MELVIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Tina Hintz brought this diversity action against Defendants Leslie Jami-son, in his capacity as Dix Township Road Commissioner, and Dix Township, alleging that the defendants breached their duty to maintain safe roads and thus caused an automobile accident in which Hintz was injured. The jury found in

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-3674 TINA KANGAIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States Distric

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff contests the denial of social security disability benefits that she sought because she is manic depressive (“bipolar,” in the current jargon) and disabled by her mental illness from holding gainful employment. Age 36 at the time of her hearing before the administrative law judge, she had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder more than a decade

[Cite as Gardner v. Das, 2024-Ohio-2429.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Tina Gardner, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 23AP-497 (C.P.C. No. 19CV-5700) v. :

[Cite as State ex rel. Johnson v. Adult Parole Auth., 2023-Ohio-578.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Gregory Johnson, : Relator, : No. 21AP-147 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Ohio Adult Parole Authority : [Re

[Cite as Starling v. Ohio Dept. of Dev. Disabilities, 2022-Ohio-2225.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Cynthia Starling, on behalf of the : Estate of Nicholas Starling, Deceased, : Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 21AP-345

2 So.3d 541 (2008) Michelle MARSHALL, individually and on behalf of her MINOR CHILDREN, Aaliyah Jamison, Brandi Marshall, and Jeremy Roberts, Dorothy Jones, Jim Adams, and Tina Andrews individually and on behalf of her Minor Children, et al. v. AIR LIQUIDE-BIG THREE, INC., Air Liquide Corporation, Air Liquide America, L.P., Global Lime Calciner of Louisiana, Inc., Global Lime, LLC, David Bergeron, and E. Roy Baggett. No. 200

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. 11 This appeal arises from a trial on the merits for the four class representatives in a class action proceeding resulting from injuries caused from exposure to carbide lime dust. Following a two-week bench trial, the trial court allocated fault amongst the defendants pursuant to multiple theories of recovery and awarded damages to each class representative. The defendants and their insurers alleged that

799 F.Supp.2d 455 (2011) Lois Jean CONNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al., Defendants. James H. Prange, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alfa Laval, Inc., et al., Defendants. James W. Stone, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alfa Laval, Inc., et al., Defendants. Tina M. Willis, Plaintiff, v. BW IP International, Inc., et al., Defendants. MDL No. 875. Civil Action Nos. 09-67099, 09-91848, 09-93

MAJORITY OPINION J. Brett Busby, Justice Appellant Valentina Spassova Tasseva Shestawy filed a petition in the District Court of Harris County seeking to enjoin the sale of her house by appellee Michael Fuqua, temporary administrator of the estate of Valentina’s deceased husband, Adel Shestawy. Valentina alleged the residence qualified as her homestead under the Tex-as Constitution and Texas Estates Code

In re ACE American Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. M, No. 2005-8706; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-CA-0990. Denied.

In re Chartis Specialty Insurance Company F/K/A American International Surplus Lines Insurance Company; Commerce and Industry Insurance Company; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. *4522005-8706; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-CA-0990. Denied.

JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge. | lAppellant, Lincoln General Insurance Company, appeals the trial court judgment denying its motion for leave of court to file a third party demand against Clarendon America Insurance Company.1 On June 28, 2005, the underlying class action lawsuit was filed, seeking damages from numerous defendants for personal injuries. The plaintiffs alleged that th

In re Chartis Specialty Insurance Company F/K/A American International Surplus Lines Insurance Company; Commerce and Industry Insurance Company; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. M, No. 2005-8706; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-CA-0990. Denied.

*449In re Air Liquide — Big Three Inc. F/K/A Lincoln Big Three Inc. et al.; Air Liquide America L.P. F/K/A Air Liquide America Corporation; — Defendant (s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. M, No. 2005-8706; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-CA-0990. Denied.

In re American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company; Commerce and Industry Ins. Co.; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. 2005-8706; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-0668. Denied.

In re ACE American Ins. Co.; ACE Property & Casualty Ins. Co.; Air Liq-uide — Big Three Inc., et al.; Air Liquide America Corporation; Air Liquide America L.P.; CIGNA Property and Casualty Insurance Company; Pacific Employers Ins. Co.; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. 2005-8706; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-0668. Denied. </

OPINION William J. Boyce, Justice A jury convicted Ronald Crow of injury to a disabled individual, a second-degree felony, and assessed punishment of two years’ imprisonment and a fine of $10,000. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.04 (West 2011). In one issue, appellant, contends the evidence is insufficient to establish the complainant suffered bodily injury. We modify the judgment and affirm it as