Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Timothy Rhett Duncan”
Viskase Corp. v. American National Can Co.public domain
18 F.Supp.2d 873 (1998) VISKASE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, Defendant. No. 93 C 7651. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 19, 1998. *874 Roy E. Hofer, William H. Frankel, Robert W. Stevenson, Allan J. Sternstein, Andrew D. Stover, Brinks Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Ch
Fleet Finance, Inc. v. Jonespublic domain
Benham, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I believe that today this court takes a regrettably bold step backwards in spite of legislation, precedent, common sense and public policy to the contrary. Without a doubt chaos will follow in the wake of today’s decision, bringing financial ruin to thousands of households and Georgia will become a safe haven for those desirous of taking unfair advanta
In Re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Sourcepublic domain
224 P.3d 178 (2010) In re The GENERAL ADJUDICATION OF ALL RIGHTS TO USE WATER IN THE GILA RIVER SYSTEM AND SOURCE. Nos. WC-07-0001-IR, WC-07-0003-IR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. February 19, 2010. *181 Law Office of Douglas C. Nelson, P.C. by Douglas C. Nelson, Phoenix, Attorney for Lower Gila Water Users, Town of Gila Bend, Arlin
Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.public domain
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Garcia’s dramatic performance met all of the requirements for copyright protection: It was copyrightable subject matter, it was original and it was fixed at the moment it was recorded. So what happened to the copyright? At times, the majority says that Garcia’s performance was not copyrightable at all. And at other times, it seems to say that Garcia just didn’t do enough to g
In Re: Gila River Systempublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc IN RE ) ) THE GENERAL ADJUDICATION OF ALL ) Arizona Supreme Court RIGHTS TO USE WATER IN THE GILA ) Nos. WC-07-0001-IR and RIVER SYSTEM AND SOURCE ) WC-07-0003-IR ) ) Maricopa County ) Superior Court
McCoy v. Gustafsonpublic domain
180 Cal.App.4th 56 (2009) CECELIA McCOY, as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. M. DOUGLAS GUSTAFSON et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. H030724. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. December 15, 2009. *62 Kathleen M. Clack for Plaintiff and Appellant. Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Gary L. Wollberg and
Askanase v. Fatjopublic domain
ORDER OF ADOPTION HITTNER, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on March 25, 1993, with respect to John Snideman’s and Management Accounting, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Cross-claims of Defendants and Cross-claimants Gerald M.H. Stein, Joseph J. Zilber, Z.L. Company, Inc., Zilber Ltd., J.Z. Ltd., and Zilber, Inc.
Stearns v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL V. *FILED UNDER SEAL* THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN unsealed October 3, 2022