Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Timothy M Graham”
DERRY M. THOMPSON v. TIMOTHY A. GRAHAMpublic domain
06/05/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 16, 2025 Session DERRY M. THOMPSON ET AL. v. TIMOTHY A. GRAHAM ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 186057-2 Deborah C. Stevens, Judge ___________________________________
State v. Grahampublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
State v. Grahampublic domain
PER CURIAM In this criminal case, defendant was convicted of four counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and, because he had been sentenced for first-degree sexual abuse twice before, he received a sentence of life without parole on each of the four counts pursuant to ORS 137.719. On appeal, defendant challenges those sentences, asserting that they were unconstitutionally disproportionate to the conduct for which he was co
Graham v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In his motion, petitioner, Mr. Graham, contends that his felon in possession of a firearm convictions should be vacated and he should be resentenced in light of United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir.2011) (
State v. Graham MacKerpublic domain
CHIEF JUSTICE McGRATH delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Graham Joseph Macker appeals from an order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, revoking his suspended sentence and committing him to the custody of the Department of Corrections. We affirm. ¶2 The following issu
Newman v. Grahampublic domain
OPINION This interlocutory appeal follows the trial court's refusal to dismiss Joel Graham's health care liability claims against Gregory Newman, D.O. In one issue, Dr. Newman complains the trial court erred by overruling his objections to the qualifications of Graham's expert and denying his motion to dismiss Graham's health care liability claims We affirm the trial court's order. *Page 199 Backg
State of Iowa v. Bradley Steven Grahampublic domain
APPEL, Justice. In this case, Bradley Graham, a juvenile offender convicted of one count of sex abuse in the third. degree, challenges his lifetime special sentence of parole and the lifetime requirement that he register as a *478 sex offender as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendme
Graham v. Floridapublic domain
*86Chief Justice Roberts, concurring in the judgment. I agree with the Court that Terrance Graham’s sentence of life without parole violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on “cruel and unusual punishments.” Unlike the majority, however, I see no need to invent a new constitutional rule of dubious pro
Graham Clark v. Timothy Curtis Johnsonpublic domain
05/29/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 18, 2018 Session GRAHAM CLARK ET AL. v. TIMOTHY CURTIS JOHNSON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sullivan County No. 16-CK-40744(M) John S. McLellan, III, Judge1
Commonwealth v. Grahampublic domain
Duffly, J. Convicted by a jury of numerous offenses, the defendant’s appeal focuses on his convictions of attempted burglary, G. L. c. 274, § 6; resisting arrest, G. L. c. 268, § 32B; and three counts of assault and battery on a police officer, G. L. c. 265, § 13D.1,2 We affirm the conviction of attempted burglary, as to which the defendant makes the following claims: (1)
Graham v. Ciroccopublic domain
31 Kan.App. 2d 563 (2003) 69 P.3d 194 BRUCE D. GRAHAM, M.D., P.A., Appellee, v. WILLIAM CIROCCO, M.D., Appellant. No. 87,736 Court of Appeals of Kansas Opinion filed May 9, 2003. *564 Timothy J. Sear, and Kevin J. Breer, of Polsinelli Shalton & Welte, P.C., of Overland Park, for appellant
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION OF DEFENDANT THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN P. GUSTAFSON, Bankruptcy Judge. This cause is before the court on Defendant The Huntington National Bank’s (“Huntington” or “Bank”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) [Doc. #24], filed on January 3, 2014. The Affidavit of David Bartlett was filed as Exhibit A to the Motion,
Theresa Graham v. R.J Reynolds Tobacco Companypublic domain
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the questions whether due process forbids giving a jury’s findings of negligence and strict liability in a class action against cigarette manufacturers preclusive effect in a later individual suit by a class member and, if not, whether federal law preempts the jury’s findings. Florida smokers and their survivors filed a class action against several tobacco companies, and aft
League v. Graham (In Re Graham)public domain
191 B.R. 489 (1996) In the Matter of Eddie Lee GRAHAM, Debtor. Harry M. LEAGUE, Plaintiff, v. Eddie Lee GRAHAM, Defendant, v. U.S. POSTAMATIC, INC. and Herbert M. Schwartz, Third-Party Defendants. Bankruptcy No. A91-71114-WHD. Adv. No. 92-6311A. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 16, 1996.
BADALAMENTI, Judge Dr. Christina Paylan seeks certiorari review of an interlocutory discovery order which directs her, in part, to produce confidential medical information to Respondents, Timothy Fitzgerald and Farmer & Fitzgerald, P.A. Because the trial court’s order departs from the essential requirements of the law and causes irreparable •harm by failing to comply with th
Earl E. Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Companypublic domain
BY THE COURT: In an earlier order of this Court, we granted a petition for rehearing en bane in this case. After that order was issued, Chief Judge Carnes discovered that he may be recused and, in an abundance of caution to avoid any appearance of impropriety, .he has recused himself from any participation in the decision of this case. This court’s earli
Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.public domain
21 Cal.Rptr.3d 331 (2004) 34 Cal.4th 553 101 P.3d 140 Robert GRAHAM et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendants and Appellants. No. S112862. Supreme Court of California. December 2, 2004. As Modified January 12, 2005. *333 Gibson,
Graham v. Grahampublic domain
[Cite as Graham v. Graham, 2020-Ohio-1435.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY TIMOTHY P. GRAHAM, CASE NO. 14-19-18 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. PATRICIA L. GRAHAM, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Union County Common Pleas Court
Earl E. Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Companypublic domain
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: In 1996,- a Florida District Court of Appeal approved certification of a class-action lawsuit originating in the Circuit Court of Dade County that encompassed an estimated 700,000 Floridians who brought state-law damages claims against the major American tobacco companies for medical conditions, including cancer, “caused by their addiction to cigarettes t
Graham v. Gunterpublic domain
855 P.2d 1384 (1993) Harold GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank GUNTER, Director of Department of Corrections, and Mark McKinna, Superintendent of Limon Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 10,000, Limon, Colorado 80826, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92SA379. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. July 26, 1993. Harold Graham, pro se. Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen., Raymon