⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

19 opinions for “Timothy Lamont Moses”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 930 F.3d 772
THAPAR, Circuit Judge. "[G]odliness has value for all things." 1 Timothy 4:8. But how do you quantify that value? See Quran 83:1 (M.A.S. Abdel Haleem trans., 2004) ("Woe to those who give short measure!"). In our legal system, we typically let the jury decide. And in this case, a jury determined that four Muslim inmates collectively suffered $900
Idaho Supreme Court · 2015-11-02 · Published · cited 42× · 159 Idaho 280; 360 P.3d 289; 2015 Ida. LEXIS 273
HORTON, Justice. This is an appeal from the district court in Caribou County, which summarily dismissed Timothy Dunlap’s successive petition for post-conviction relief. Dunlap raised several substantive claims for post-conviction relief. For each substantive claim, he advanced a corresponding claim of ineffective assistance of appel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004-11-30 · Published · cited 437× · 389 F.3d 662; 65 Fed. R. Serv. 1151; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24663; 2004 F. App'x 0412P
MARBLEY, District Judge. Defendant-Appellant, Sean Lamont Cromer, appeals his conviction by a jury for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal, Cromer asserts the following grounds for reversal: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the district court plainly erred by allowing a witness to testify about hearsay statements made by a
Idaho Supreme Court · 2015-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 41105 TIMOTHY ALAN DUNLAP, ) ) Boise, February 2015 Term Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) 2015 Opinion No. 103 v. )
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017-07-24 · Published · cited 10× · 266 F. Supp. 3d 1170
DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge Lamont Lathan brought this putative class action .in diversity' in this court against Uber' Technologies, Inc. and its chief executive officer, Travis Kalanick, alleging tortious interference with prospective business relations, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, unfair competition, fraud and misrepresentation, and violations of Wisconsin’
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001-11-02 · Published · cited 30× · 553 S.E.2d 511; 262 Va. 604; 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 37; 2001 Va. LEXIS 117
553 S.E.2d 511 (2001) 262 Va. 604 Jae-Woo CHA v. KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF WASHINGTON, et al. Record No. 003022. Supreme Court of Virginia. November 2, 2001. *512 William E. Hassan, Fairfax (Kimberley A. Murphy, Woodbridge; Ryan M. Mattson; Hale & Hassan, Carlson & Penn, on briefs), for appella
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012-07-06 · Published · cited 6× · 2012 Ohio 3098
[Cite as State v. Wilson, 2012-Ohio-3098.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 24577 v. : T.C. NO. 10CR1612 DEREK L. WILSON : (Criminal appeal from
Heaton v. Moorepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994-12-21 · Published · cited 14× · 43 F.3d 1176; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36065
43 F.3d 1176 129 Lab.Cas. P 33,187, 2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 801 Joe HEATON; Edward L. Stockwell; Natilee J. Crammer;Donald L. Daniels; Frank H. Parker, Jr.; Robert Smith;Robert D. Norris; Leon D. Maifield; Carmen D. Jenkins;Jerry Giboney; Hazel Elder; Linda F. Winingear; Tina M.Meder; Jack Meder, Sr.; Gary L. Kern; Barbara L. Dolezal;June Cornelius; C.F. Cornelius; Kenneth W.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994-05-09 · Published · cited 81× · 874 P.2d 352; 18 Brief Times Rptr. 829; 1994 Colo. LEXIS 361; 1994 WL 174467
874 P.2d 352 (1994) AMERICAN WATER DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Colorado corporation, Applicant-Appellant, v. CITY OF ALAMOSA; County of Alamosa; Alexander Ranch; Darell Keith Alexander; Richard Angell; Baca Grande Water & Sanitation District; Fred Bauder; Harold L. Bennett; Richard Blumenhein; Bonanza Road Water Users, Owners and Objectors; Lena C. Chiles; Floyd D. Chiles; Terry R. Chiles; Cyril Clayton; Dave Collins; David P. Collins; Barbara J. Co
Supreme Court of the United States · 1973-05-29 · Published · cited 399× · 36 L. Ed. 2d 772; 93 S. Ct. 2080; 412 U.S. 94; 1973 U.S. LEXIS 4; 1 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1855; 27 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 907
Mr. Justice Brennan, with whom Mr. Justice Marshall concurs, dissenting. These cases require us to consider whether radio and television broadcast licensees may, with the approval of the Federal Communications Commission,1 refuse absolutely to sell any part of their advertising time to groups or individuals wishing to speak out on controversial issues of public importance. I
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 450 F.2d 642
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: In these cases we are asked to decide whether a broadcast licensee may, as a general policy, refuse to sell any of its advertising time to groups or individuals wishing to speak out on controversial public issues. The Federal Communications Commission concluded that such a policy is permissible.1 We reverse the Commission’s decision. And we remand for further proc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971-10-04 · Published · cited 23× · 450 F.2d 642
450 F.2d 642 146 U.S.App.D.C. 181 BUSINESS EXECUTIVES' MOVE FOR VIETNAM PEACE, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States ofAmerica, Respondents, Post-Newsweek Stations,Capital Area, Inc., Intervenor.DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States ofAmerica, Respondents, American BroadcastingCompanies, Inc. and Colu
Heaton v. Moorepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994-12-21 · Published · cited 4× · 43 F.3d 1176; 1994 WL 707136
HANSEN, Circuit Judge. The defendants, the Department of Corrections for the State of Missouri (DOC) and Dick D. Moore, Director of the DOC, appeal the district court’s 1 order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs, who are DOC employees, on their claim that the defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-216. The district court found that the defendants’ pol
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2015-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK