Cases

744 P.2d 491 (1987) The UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Robert W. JESSE, Water Division No. 2 Engineer; State of Colorado, Department of Natural Resources and all other Departments, Agencies and Divisions, and on behalf of the People of the State of Colorado; City and County of Denver, By and Through its Board of Water Commissioners; Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District; Twin Lakes Reservoir and Canal Company; City of Colorado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM PORTER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-2464 (TJK) ROBERT F. KENNEDY, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION William Porter, a law school graduate proceeding pro se, is a former Department of Health and

JUSTICE SHEA delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Plaintiffs Marc and Gloria Flora appeal the October 13, 2015, Order by the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting their preliminary injunction based on a prescriptive easement rather than on an express public easement. The Floras

SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge, with whom Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS joins, concurring: I concur in the decision of the majority, not because I believe it to be the correct result, but because I am compelled to do so by precedent. Boiling the controversy down to its essence, the answer to one two-part question determines the result: Does the attorney work-product privilege protect

SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge, with whom Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS joins, concurring: I concur in the decision of the majority, not because I believe it to be the correct result, but because I am compelled to do so by precedent. Boiling the controversy down to its essence, the answer to one two-part question determines the result: Does the attorney work-product privilege protected by FOIA Exemption 5 pro

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND STAY DALE A. KIMBALL, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Community Television of Utah, LLC, KUTV Licensee, and Fox Broadcasting Company’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Plaintiff Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Defendant Aereo, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Su

266 B.R. 544 (2001) In re SUWANNEE SWIFTY STORES, INC., EIN: XX-XXXXXXX, Debtor. Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Georgia Lottery Corporation, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96-60807, Adversary No. 98-6078. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia, Thomasville Division. May 17, 2001. *545 Jonathan H. Alden, Assistan

627 F.Supp.2d 786 (2009) In Re: COMMERCIAL MONEY CENTER, INC., EQUIPMENT LEASE LITIGATION. Case No. 1:02CV16000. MDL Docket No. 1490. This Order Relates To Case No. 02CV16014. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 2, 2009. *789 Howard J.C. Nicols, James A. Vollins, Thomas S. Babel, Thomas S. Kilbane, Squire, Sa

John T. Copenhaver, Jr., United States District Judge Pending is plaintiff Robin L. Hinkle's motion, filed July 20, 2016, for reconsideration of the court's memorandum opinion and order of July 19, 2016. I. Reconsideration Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) On July 19, 2016, the court entered a memorandum opinion and order dismissing Hinkle's claims under the debt collection provisions of

IVERS, Judge: The appellant, Patsy C. Russo, appeals a May 6, 1993, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) denying service connection for residuals of frozen feet. Patsy C. Russo, BVA 93-08404 (May 6, 1993). The Court has jurisdiction over the ease pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will vacate the Board’s decision denying service connection and remand the ma

506 F.3d 1211 (2007) Jesse CUMMINGS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marty SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. No. 06-7091. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. October 30, 2007. *1212 *1213 *1214

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 14, 2016 Decided July 19, 2016 Reissued December 20, 2016 No. 15-5051 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Filed 7/15/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 187 EOG Resources, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Soo Line Ra

906 So.2d 57 (2004) Jane DOE, By and Through her Natural Mother and Next Friend, B.J. DOE, Appellant, v. NORTH PANOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT; Bonnie Smith, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Superintendent of North Panola School District; Jesse Orange, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Principal of Como Middle School; and Finis Sanders, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Teacher. No. 2003-CA-01040-COA

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 208-10-09 Vtec } In re: Lamoille Valley Rail Trail } Act 250 Jurisdictional Opinion (Reconsidered) } (Appeal of VTrans & VAST) } } Decision and Order on Cross-Motions for Partial

216 October 15, 2025 No. 899 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Jesse FREEBY, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOODOO SKI BOWL DEVELOPERS, INC., an Oregon corporation, dba Hoodoo Ski Area, Defendant-Respondent. Linn County Circuit Court 21CV34513; A180522 Thomas McHill, Judge

216 October 15, 2025 No. 899 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Jesse FREEBY, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOODOO SKI BOWL DEVELOPERS, INC., an Oregon corporation, dba Hoodoo Ski Area, Defendant-Respondent. Linn County Circuit Court 21CV34513; A180522 Thomas McHill, Judge

Justice MULLARKEY concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur with the majority that the applicants are precluded from using urban runoff as part of their augmentation plans to compensate for post-pumping depletions of not nontributary ground water from the Denver aquifer. I agree that section 37-92-103(9), 15 C.R.S. (1990), prohibits a plan for augmentation from inclu

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 26-1348 ____________ CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. SECRETARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR; DIRECTOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, Appellants ____________ On App

Filed 7/15/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 187 EOG Resources, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Soo Line Ra