⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Timothy James Ross”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013-04-05 · Published · cited 350× · 712 F.3d 784; 2013 WL 1363525; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6896
OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Attorney General of Pennsylvania (the “Commonwealth”) appeals from an order of the District Court dated December 29, 2011, denying the Commonwealth’s mo *788 tion to dismiss the habea
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2009-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions on En Banc Review filed August 25, 2009 Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions on En Banc Review filed August 25, 2009.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2009-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions on En Banc Review filed August 25, 2009 Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions on En Banc Review filed August 25, 2009. In The
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2018-04-27 · Published · cited 23× · 419 P.3d 608; 55 Kan. App. 2d 524
Bruns, J.: *527 *615 This is a derivative action filed in Johnson County District Court by Monica Ross-Williams on behalf of the Sprint Nextel Corporation. The action arises out of the 2005 mer
Ross v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992-09-09 · Published · cited 0× · 604 So. 2d 40; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9448; 1992 WL 216571
PER CURIAM. We withdraw our opinion in Ross v. State, No. 90-1531 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 4, 1991), and pursuant to the mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in State v. Ross, 596 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1992), we reissue this opinion, affirming the trial court order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009-02-03 · Published · cited 21× · 557 F.3d 237; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2633; 2009 WL 242376
557 F.3d 237 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Patrick ROSS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-41098. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 3, 2009. James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for U.S. Joseph R. Barroso, Corpus Christi, TX, for Ross. Before JONES, Chief Judge, and OWEN and SOUTHWICK, Circu
State v. Rosspublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 1992-04-23 · Published · cited 0× · 596 So. 2d 1058; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 255; 1992 Fla. LEXIS 815; 1992 WL 80085
OVERTON, Justice. We quash the decision of the district court in Ross v. State, No. 90-1531, 1991 WL 253834 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 4, 1991), on the authority of State v. Barnes, 595 So.2d 22 (Fla.1992), and remand for further proceedings consistent with our decision in Barnes. It is so ordered. SHAW, C.J., and McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2009-08-25 · Published · cited 37× · 296 S.W.3d 206; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6660; 2009 WL 2589394
296 S.W.3d 206 (2009) Marjorie ROSS, Joan Seelback, Timothy R. Ross, James R. Ross, Billy R. Ross, and Robert R. Ross, Appellants v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 14-07-00860-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 25, 2009. *208 Marcus D. Pinney, Houston, TX, for appellants. Stephen G. Tipps
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 874 N.W.2d 806; 2016 Minn. App. LEXIS 7
OPINION SMITH, Judge. We reverse the district court’s judgment granting preaward interest under Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(b) (2014), ■ because the statute does not apply to appraisal awards pursuant to an insurance- policy in the absence of an underlying breach of contract or actionable wrongdoing. FACTS
Ross v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003-12-31 · Published · cited 0× · 862 So. 2d 920; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19777; 2003 WL 23094710
WHATLEY, Judge. We affirm Julius Ross’s convictions and sentences, but we remand for correction of the judgment to reflect that under count III, Ross was convicted of violating section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1999), and it is a third-degree felony. Affirmed and remanded with directions. SALCINES and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2017-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-16-00072-CR TIMOTHY JAMES MAYS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. CR1500926 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017-06-30 · Published · cited 9× · 240 So. 3d 550
PER CURIAM. *554In case no. 1130590, Kathryn L. Honea appeals from the denial of her motion to vacate an arbitration award entered in favor of Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. ("Raymond James"), and Bernard Michaud, an employee of Raymond James (hereinafter referred to collectively as "RJFS"). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and reman
Ross v. Rosspublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994-05-02 · Published · cited 27× · 640 N.E.2d 265; 94 Ohio App. 3d 123; 1994 Ohio App. LEXIS 1664; 1994 WL 502478
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 125 Appellants, Ann Dorothy Ross, Lloyd Ross, Sr., Lloyd Ross, Jr., and Rita Ann Ross Knapik, appeal from the disqualification of their counsel by the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas in their malpractice action against appellees, Joseph Gibson, Marc Ziccarelli, and Robert Boyd, and their breach of fiduciary duty
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-09-08 · Published · cited 2× · 671 F.3d 391; 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1951; 108 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6177; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18618; 2011 WL 3962915
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2347 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INCORPORATED, a Virginia Nonprofit Corporation; MICHELE G. WADDELL; JOANNE V. MERRILL, Plaintiffs − Appellants, and MARTHA A. NEAL; DAVID STEIN, M.D.; PAUSANIAS ALEXANDER; MARY T. BENDORF; DELEGATE KATHY BYRON; JEFF HELGESON, Plaintiffs,
Ross v. Negron-Rosspublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 0×
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: ___________ 3 Filing Date: April 25, 2017 4 NO. 33,418 5 GARY M. ROSS, 6 Petitioner-Appellee, 7 v. 8 STEPHANIE NEGRON-ROSS, 9 Respondent-Appellant. 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 11 Alisa A. Hadfield, District Judge 12 L. Helen Bennett, P.C. 13 L. Helen Bennett 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Appellee 16 Stephanie Negron 17 Ocean Park, PR 18 Pro Se Appellant 1
Ross v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993-01-20 · Published · cited 51× · 861 S.W.2d 870; 1992 WL 360549
861 S.W.2d 870 (1992) James Clarence ROSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 69206. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. December 9, 1992. Rehearing Granted January 20, 1993. Opinion Reconsidering Decision in Part on Rehearing January 20, 1993. *871 Douglas M. O'Brien (court
Ross v. Negron-Rosspublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 6× · 2017 NMCA 61
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 13:32:37 2017.08.22 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STAT
People v. Rosspublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-04-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 2965
People v Ross (2018 NY Slip Op 02965) People v Ross 2018 NY Slip Op 02965 Decided on April 27, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009-11-13 · Published · cited 13× · 588 F.3d 831; 2009 WL 3791623
DENNIS, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the denial in part of a preliminary injunction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). The underlying case is ancillary to a securities fraud action by the SEC against a bank and related companies. SEC v. Stanford Int’l Bank, Ltd., No. 3-09-0298-N (N.D.Tex.). This case arises out of an alleged mu
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
03/11/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 11, 2018 TIMOTHY CARTER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2012-B-1221 Cheryl Blackburn, Judge No. M2018-00061-CCA-R3-PC The