Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Timothy J. Bolden”
In Re Boldenpublic domain
327 B.R. 657 (2005) In re Dwight M. BOLDEN, Debtor. No. LA 04-29732 TD. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. June 21, 2005. *658 Timothy J. Silverman, Esq., Solomon, Grindle, Silverman & Spinella, San Diego, CA, for State Street Bank, etc. Timothy J. Yoo, Los Angeles, CA, Chapter 7 Trustee.
Bolden v. Statepublic domain
OPINION DARDEN, Judge STATEMENT OF THE CASE Doyle Bolden appeals the trial court’s reinstatement of his conviction by jury of operating a vehicle with at least .10% of alcohol by weight in grams in 210 liters of his breath, a violation of Ind.Code § 9-30-5 — 1(a)(2). We reverse. ISSUE Whether the t
Bolden v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error in the trial court’s denial of Tony Bolden’s claims *515that his trial counsel was ineffective. However, as the State points out, Bolden was improperly sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment for attempted
Bolden v. Langpublic domain
In March 1995 Timothy Bolden filed a multi-count complaint against Father Cordell Lang, McGill Toolen Catholic High School (McGill Toolen), St. Mary's Catholic Church (St.Mary's), Archdiocese of Mobile, National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB), and United States Catholic Conference (USCC). The complaint alleged that Bolden attended school at McGill Toolen from 1988 through 1991 and that during that time, Lang served in the dual role of associate priest at St. Mary's and g
Bolden v. Statepublic domain
Hunstein, Justice. Appellant, Willie Frank Bolden, was found guilty of the felony murder of Eddie Dobson and of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime.1 Bolden appeals, contending that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of an independent offense he had purportedly committed. We disagree and affirm. 1. Evidence adduced at trial showed that appellant a
State v. Boldenpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Bolden, 2016-Ohio-4727.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2014-L-121 - vs - : ERRICK THERMAINE BOLDEN,
State v. Boldenpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Bolden, 2016-Ohio-8488.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104227 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
People v. Boldenpublic domain
59 Ill. App.3d 441 (1978) 375 N.E.2d 898 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLIFFORD BOLDEN et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 62727, 62755, 63075, 63077, 63208, 76-767 cons. Illinois Appellate Court First District (5th Division). Opinion filed April 14, 1978. Modified on denial of rehearing May 12, 1978.
GAMBALE, JOSEPH J., PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 541 KA 14-00722 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH J. GAMBALE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHE
Kevin Hackie v. Colonel William J. Bryant, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Arkansas State Policepublic domain
Cite as 2022 Ark. 212 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-21-533 Opinion Delivered: December 1, 2022 KEVIN HACKIE APPELLANT V. APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT COLONEL WILLIAM J. BRYANT, IN HIS [NO. 60CV-17-7559] OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR
State of Missouri v. Brad J. Juliuspublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED100555 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Franklin ) County Circuit Court vs. )
State of Missouri v. Brad J. Juliuspublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED100555 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Franklin ) County Circuit Court vs. )
State of Missouri v. Brad J. Juliuspublic domain
Philip M. Hess, Judge Introduction Brad Julius (Defendant) appeals from his judgment of conviction of sexual assault. On appeal, Defendant raises seven points, alleging that the trial court unduly restricted pre-trial discovery, committed four separate instructional errors, and erroneously declined to admonish the jury and grant a mistrial after the prosecu
State v. Vincent Boldenpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 2000 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. VINCENT BOLDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henry County No. 12735 Julian P. Guinn, Judge No. W1999-01481-CCA-R3-CD - August 4, 2000 This appeal arises out of the defendant’s conviction for selling a controlled substanc
People v. Boldenpublic domain
569 N.E.2d 597 (1991) 210 Ill. App.3d 940 155 Ill.Dec. 416 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel N. BOLDEN III, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-89-0190. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. March 21, 1991. *599 G. Joseph Weller, Deputy Defender, Barb
Behrens v. Kerrypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NINA K. BEHRENS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1590 (TJK) MICHAEL R. POMPEO, Secretary, United States Department of State, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this Title VII suit for retaliation (Count One) and retaliatory hostile work env
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA END CITIZENS UNITED PAC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1665 (TJK) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM End Citizens United, a political action committee, filed a complaint with the Federal Elec- tion Commission against former Presid
Bolden v. Blumpublic domain
Meyer, J. (dissenting). The judgment of Special Term should be reinstated. There is no question that the Boldens qualify as a "needy” family under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. The sole issue on this appeal is whether they are "categorically related” to that program. The facts are undisputed. Petitioner Annie Bolden and her husband reside with their seven children in Mon
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Few, The Proud, The Forgotten, Vietnam Veterans of America, and the Connecticut State Council of Vietnam Veterans of America (together, “Plaintiffs”), brought this action against the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“Defendant”), raising two claims under the Freedom of Information Act
Porter v. Kennedy, Jr.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM PORTER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-2464 (TJK) ROBERT F. KENNEDY, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION William Porter, a law school graduate proceeding pro se, is a former Department of Health and