Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,__________________ December 04, 2012 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A12A1910. WILLIAM LARRY WEAVER v. TIMOTHY J. MORGAN. William Larry Weaver contends that he was extradited from Georgia in 1997 to stand trial for murder in Montana, where he is presently incarcerated. In 2012, he filed a motion in Gwinnett County Superior Court

CCA 38825. On further consideration of the granted issue, 75 M.J. 469 (C.A.A.F. 2016), and in light of United States v. McClour, 76 M.J. 23 (C.A.A.F. 2017), it is ordered that the judgment of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is hereby affirmed.

COHEN, J. Justin Timothy Morgan appeals from his conviction of attempted lewd or lascivious exhibition following a jury trial. This case arose from a Craigslist advertisement posted by a detective with the Citrus County Sheriffs Office. The advertisement, placed in the “casual encounters” section of the website, was entitled “Opened Minded Mom looking to share intimate fun — w4m—38,” signifying a thirty-eight-year-old woman

¶[1 — Naveen and Anuradha Jain were found by a federal district court to have violated section 16(b) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1 The case was settled pending appeal. The Jains then brought state tort claims against a brokerage and two law firms involved in the securities case. The superior court dismissed those claims, finding that they constituted de facto indemnity claims barred under federal securities law. We

SELYA, Circuit Judge. *662 This case involves a constitutional challenge to the Massachusetts firearms licensing statute, as implemented in the communities of Boston and Brookline. All of the individual plaintiffs sought and received licenses from one of those two communities to carry fire

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT In re: BRYAN MATTHEW DAVIS;  CARLA DENISE BRACEY-DAVIS; MARQUITA E. MOORE, Debtors. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and  No. 12-1184 TD BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. BRYAN MATTHEW DAVIS; CARLA DENISE BRACEY-DAVIS; MARQUITA E. MOORE, Defendants-App

ABRAMSON, Justice, Concurring in part and Dissenting in part. While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that Moore Pontiac had no liability as a matter of law, I disagree with the concept that Morgan should now owe 100% of the damage verdict. In this case the jury was instructed in assessing fault to “consider both the nature of the conduct of

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. The district court granted a motion to dismiss brought by the Town of Lexington, Massachusetts (“Lexington”), Lexington Public Schools (“LPS”), its superintendent, and a principal (collectively “the defendants”), ending a civil rights suit filed by a mother, Christine Morgan, who complained that the defendants inadequately responded to the bullying of her s

*271 Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded in part by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge GREGORY concurred. OPINION WYNN, Circuit Judge: In Schlesinger v. Councilman, 420 U.S. 738, 95 S.Ct. 130

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Christine Morgan (“Morgan”), next friend and mother of the minor R.M., has filed this lawsuit against defendants Town of Lexington (“Lexington”), Lexington Public Schools (“LPS”), Super-intendant Paul Ash (“Ash”) and Principal Steven Flynn (“Flynn”) (collectively, the “Defendants”), alleging a violation of R.M.’s substan

MARKMAN ORDER1 TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge. This case pertains to a patented process for “enhancing the color of and stabilizing wet process phosphoric acid” for use in liquid fertilizer. United States Patent No. 4,808,391. (“'391 Patent”). The purpose of the patented process, which involves chemical oxidation and reduction steps, is to “produce a marketabl

OPINION OF THE COURT Graffeo, J. At issue on this appeal is whether the Martin Act (General Business Law art 23-A) preempts plaintiffs common-law causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and gross negligence. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that plaintiffs common-law claims are not preempted. Plaintiff Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. commenced this action against defendant J.P Mor

ORDER PER CURIAM KJ. appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ronald K. Replogle, Timothy Lohmar, and the St. Charles Sheriffs Department a/k/a the St. Charles Police Department on KJ.’s Petition for Declaratory Judgment. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be

922 A.2d 395 (2007) Charles MORGAN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 172, 2006. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: January 10, 2007. Decided: March 29, 2007. Nicole M. Walker, Esquire, Office of the Public Defender, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellant. Timothy J. Donovan, Jr., Esquire, Depart

ASHLEE S. MORGAN * NO. 2022-CA-0472 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ROBERT J. MORGAN, JR. * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM 25TH JDC, PARISH OF PLAQUEMINES NO. 66-959, DIVISION “B” Honorable Michael D. Cleme

FILED Aug 07 2024, 9:28 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendant Flowserve Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 272). The Motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition.1 I. Relevant Background. This is an asbestos action pending against 11 defendants,2 alleging various st

ORDER NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge. Pending befoi’e the Coux’t is the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Doe. 218]. The motion is granted in part and denied in part. *549I. Background On July 15, 2010, the City of Moberly, Missouri approved the issuance of $89 million in municipal bonds by the I

ORDER NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge. The Court previously granted partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant *936Armstrong Teasdale, LLP on Plaintiff John Cromeans’ claims for legal malpractice and negligent misrepresentation. See [Docs. 93 and 170]. Cromeans filed a motion to vacate the order [Docs. 455 and 545] which the Court

ORDER NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge. Third-Party Defendants the City of Moberly, Missouri and the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Moberly move to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint of Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc. for failure to state a claim. [Doc. # 197], For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. I. Background On Jul