Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ April 06, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A22A0605. WOODARD v. HARRISON et al. Timothy Woodard has filed an original mandamus action in this Court. Although the procedural posture of Woodard’s case is not entirely clear from the mandamus petition, it appears that Woodard is currently serving a sentenc

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SGT. Robert Timothy Ankrom, FILED Petitioner February 7, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0357 (Harrison County 16-P-9-1) SUPREME COURT OF APPEA

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this appeal be dismissed and the case remanded to the district court. Plaintiff-appellee Andre Watts brought suit against defendant-appellant Officer Timothy Harris

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 07-1-00942-6, Roger A. Bennett, J., entered April 24, 2008. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Van Deren, C.J., and QuinnBrintnall, J.

165 P.3d 859 (2007) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Timothy HARRISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04CA2678. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VI. February 8, 2007. Certiorari Denied August 27, 2007. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Paul Koehler, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee. <

FILED Apr 26, 2021 12:53 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION

10/25/2016 DA 15-0707 Case Number: DA 15-0707 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 271 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAMES JOHN HARRISON,

03/14/2017 DA 14-0799 Case Number: DA 14-0799 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2017 MT 60 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTINA LOUISE HARRISON,

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). PADOVANO, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellant Kevin Harrison appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable Philip Heag-ney presiding. A jury convicted Harrison of first degree murder and armed criminal action. The trial court sentenced him to terms in the department of corrections of life in prison without parole and twenty-five years, respectively. On appe

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). PADOVANO, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 14:45:05 2013.11.07 Certiorari Granted, October 18, 2013, No. 34,349 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). PADOVANO, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: *1111 The Fourth Amendment requires that a person who has been arrested and detained without a warrant must "promptly be brought before a neutral magistrate for a judicial determination of probable cause," generally within forty-eight hours. Cty. of River

387 B.R. 759 (2008) In the Matter of Timothy William HARRISON. No. 06-10119. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. April 7, 2008. Roy Kiplinger, Beers Mailers Backs & Salin, LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, for Allen County Treasurer. Mark A. Warsco, Rothberg Logan & Warsco L.L.P., Fort Wayne, IN, for trustee. DECISION ON T

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to, once again, interpret and apply Maine’s Whistleblower Protection Act, Me.Rev.Stat. tit. 26, § 833. Appellant Torrey Harrison (“Harrison”), a social worker, wants to be able to tell a jury that appellee Granite Bay Care, Inc. (“Granite Bay”) illegally fired her in violation of that statute. Her theory is Granite' Bay was getting bac

Justice Armstead: In this appeal from the West Virginia Public Service Commission ("the PSC"), we are asked to examine the PSC's statutory jurisdiction over ratemaking by a public service district, jurisdiction that hinges on the number of "customers" served by the district. The PSC has jurisdiction to review rates for water and sewer service charged by small public service districts

870 A.2d 326 (2005) Patricia HARRISON, Appellee, v. Timothy J. HAYES, M.D., Margaret E. Marcinik, D.O., Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital and Mercy Health System. Appeal of: Margaret E. Marcinik, D.O., Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital and Mercy Health System. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 26, 2004. Filed February 3, 2005. Reargument Denied April 13, 2005.

304 F.Supp.2d 710 (2004) Timothy C. HARRISON v. Martin L. GRASS, et al. No. CIV. CCB-03-0912. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 10, 2004. William J. Murphy, John J. Connolly, Murphy and Shaffer, Thomas M. Wood, IV, Neuberger Quinn Gielen Rubin and Gibber PA, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. *711 Rebecca H. E