Cases

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

671 F.Supp.2d 1230 (2009) Barbara Lohman JOHNSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Verne Lohman, Deceased; Kristin E. Lohman, Brett E. Lohman, Bryan R. Lohman, Natural Children and Heirs of Richard Verne Lohman, Deceased; *1231 Jerry D. Biggs, Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael A. Baker; Nicole Baker and Warren Baker, Natural Children and Heirs of Michael A. Baker, Deceased; Jeffrey Rudis

Justice Lehrmann, delivered the opinion of the Court. This case concerns whether the statute of limitations bars a claim for breach of a recorded right of first refusal to purchase a mineral interest. The grantors of the right conveyed the mineral interest to a third party without notifying the holders. More than four years later, the rightholders learned of the conveyance and sued the

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE This is a products liability case where Barbara Kaiser claimed to have been substantially and permanently injured by a mesh product that was implanted in her vagina to treat her pelvic organ prolapse. The mesh product was designed and manufactured by defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. After a two week trial, the jury agreed with Mrs. Kaiser and found in her favor on her failure to warn and desi

333 S.C. 96 (1998) 508 S.E.2d 575 Joan Caldwell JOHNSON, Brice Anderson, Lorraine Witherspoon Baker, Faye Blaylock, Sara Edell Boan, Mike Brewer, Mike Brown, Ronald Callahan, Sandra Coulter, Lisa Crum, Andreas Drutis, Crystal Gayle Edwards, Darryl Bernard Epps, Buster Elfin Floyd, Deanna Kay Franz, William Joseph Harnett, Jr., George Henley, Loretta Jones, Margaret Locklear, Tammy Locklear, Linda McCleod, William McCormick, Hugh M

Opinion issued July 24, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00404-CV ——————————— BONNIE JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JALEN JOHNSON, AND ANTHONY JOHNSON, Appellants

718 F.Supp.2d 988 (2010) Regina Ann JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. BE & K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC and Archer Daniels Midland Company, Defendants. No. 3:08-cv-00150. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Davenport Division. June 22, 2010. *990 John F. Doak, Katz Huntoon & Fieweger, Moline, IL, Jennifer J. Pomaranski, Timothy

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2015-Ohio-4492.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 102369 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

MOYLAN, J. By virtue of an at least partially successful suit on the merits, the appellant is in position to recover $200,000 in damages. The appellant’s aspiration, however, is to recover three and a half million dollars in damages. What stands between the already captured bird in the hand and the still elusive second bird in the b

MARTIN, Justice. This appeal presents the question of how North Carolina law allocates the risk of loss between a buyer and a seller when the closing attorney in a residential real estate transaction embezzles the sales proceeds. We conclude that in most residential closings buyers possess practical advantages over sellers in terms of protecting themselves from attorney misconduct. Therefore, under principles of equity recog

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and (2) DENYING MOTION TO EXCLUDE David Alan Ezra, Senior United States District Judge The matters before the Court are (1) Defendant United Healthcare of Texas, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “United Health”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 15); and (2) Plaintiffs Stephen A. Johnson and Mai Johnson’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2015-Ohio-96.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99377 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 520–592 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

Beier, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority’s resolution of the nonconstitutional issues in this case. I also agree with the majority’s determination that the statutoiy cap on noneconomic damages does not violate the doctrine of separation of powers. I would, however, reverse and remand to the district court because K.S.A. 60-19a02, as applied to plaintiff Amy

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT..............................................■......282 A. Alamance County...................................................282 1. Population and Demographics of Alamance County ................282 2. Law Enforcem

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION FLORENCE-MARIE COOPER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (docket no. 98), filed on July 17, 2008. The Court has considered the moving, opposition and reply documents submitted in connection with this Motion. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Se

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge. This lawsuit results from Allstate Insurance Company’s failing to settle a demand for insurance policy limits of $50,000 made against its insured, Wayne Davis, Jr. Edward and Virginia Johnson made the demand after the pickup that Davis was driving crossed the center line of a Camden County highway on March 24, 2000, and crashed head on into the Johnsons’ car. The Johnsons suffered life-threa

*1146 After Remand from Alabama Supreme Court MAIN, Judge. Shonda Nicole Johnson was convicted of capital murder, in violation of § 13A-5-40(14), Ala.Code 1975, for intentionally murdering Randy McCullar, who had testified or was to testify in a criminal proceeding, specifically a bigamy case, against Johnson, where the murder stemmed f

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT FEDERAL CAPITAL CONVICTIONS AND DEATH SENTENCES MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................682 A. Factual Background ............................