Cases

271 S.W.3d 450 (2008) Christine L. COTE, Trustee of the Cote Family Trust, The Cote Family Trust, and Christine L. Cote, Individually and as the Beneficiary of the Cote Family Trust, Appellants v. TEXCAN VENTURES II and Nunzio DeSantis, Appellees. No. 05-07-01447-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. November 26, 2008. *451 Timo

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant James A. Lasky appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated October 8,1998, which denied his motion to transfer the venue of this action to Schoharie County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs. We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant has failed to meet his burd

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2023-0053, Maria Melekos v. Wanda Cote, the court on October 16, 2023, issued the following order: The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The defendant, Wanda Cote, appeals a small claim judgment in the amount of $6,000 plus interest and costs issued by th

945 A.2d 412 (2008) 286 Conn. 603 STATE of Connecticut v. Brian COTE. No. 18014. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued January 3, 2008. Decided April 22, 2008. *414 James A. Wade, with whom were Brett J. Boskiewicz, Richard M. Fil and, on the brief, Jeffrey J. White and Ndidi N. Moses, Hart

*348 OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: In these three coordinated actions, neurosurgeons associated with the plaintiff Neuroaxis Neurosurgical Associates, PC (“Neuroaxis”) seek payment from welfare benefit plans for close to 200 surgical procedures performed on plan members. Neuroaxis has sued Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐1249 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. TIMOTHY HILLIARD, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐1249 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. TIMOTHY HILLIARD, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. This insurance coverage dispute arises out of a breach of contract and negligence lawsuit pending in the New York Supreme Court. The plaintiff Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company (“Atlantic Casualty”) seeks a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend Value Waterproofing, Inc. (“Value”) or to indemnify Value in the underlying action. Valu

734 F.Supp.2d 368 (2010) TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY as Administrator for Reliance Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY-STATE OF NEW YORK, TDX Construction Corp., and Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates, P.C., Defendants. Dormitory Authority of the State of New York and TDX Construction Corp., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Trataros Construction, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Trataros Construction, Inc. and Travelers

390 F.Supp.2d 395 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Alex RUDAJ, et al., Defendants. No. 04 CR.1110 DLC. United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 3, 2005. *396 *397 Timothy Treanor, Jennifer G. Rodgers, Benjamin Gruenstein, Assistant United States Attorneys, United States Attorney'

713 F.Supp.2d 249 (2010) Laura SEIDL, individually, derivatively and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES, INC., American Century Investment Management, Inc., James E. Stowers, Jr., James E. Stowers, III, Jonathan S. Thomas, Thomas A. Brown, Andrea C. Hall, Donald H. Pratt, Gale E. Sayers, M. Jeannine Strandjord, Timothy S. Webster, William M. Lyons, Mark Mallon, Wade Slome, Bruce Wimberly, and Jerr

735 F.Supp.2d 42 (2010) TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY as Administrator for Reliance Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY-STATE OF NEW YORK, TDX Construction Corp., and Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates, P.C., Defendants. Dormitory Authority of the State of New York and TDX Construction Corp., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Trataros Construction, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Trataros Construction, Inc. and Travelers

385 F.Supp.2d 403 (2005) In re WIRELESS TELEPHONE SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS No. 02 Civ. 2637(DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 2, 2005. *404 Scott A. Bursor, Law Offices of Scott A. Bursor, New York, New York, Nadeem Faruqi, Lubna Faruqi, Adam R. Gonnelli, Faruqi &a;

137 F.Supp.2d 452 (2001) CROMER FINANCE LTD. and Prival N.V., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael BERGER, Fund Administration Services (Bermuda) Ltd., Ernst & Young International, Ernst & Young Bermuda, Kempe & Whittle Associates Limited, Deloitte & Touche (Bermuda), Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Deloitte & Touche L.L.P., Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Bear Stearns Securities Corp., Financial Asset Management, Inc., and John Does 1-100,

158 F.Supp.2d 347 (2001) CROMER FINANCE LTD. and Prival N.V., et al., Plaintiff, v. Michael BERGER, Fund Administration Services (Bermuda) Ltd., Ernst & Young International, Ernst & Young Bermuda, Kempe & Whittle Associates Limited, Deloitte & Touche (Bermuda), Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Deloitte & Touche L.L.P., Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Bear Stearns Securities Corp., Financial Asset Management, Inc., and John Does 1-100,

*462 MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Mr. Chehade Dib Lichaa Al Khouri, a Lebanese citizen, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision, affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Natio

MORTON, Circuit Judge. This is an action on a war risk insurance policy. The District Judge submitted the case to a jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiff, with a special finding that the plaintiff became permanently and totally disabled on October 11, 1918. The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the defendant was entitled to a directed verdict. The plaintiff enlisted in the Na

MEMORANDUM TAURO, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs bring this consolidated putative class action against Boston Scientific and alleged fiduciaries of Boston Scientific’s 401(H) Retirement Savings Plan. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the Plan and to participants of the Plan, in violation of ERISA, by imprudently selecting com

516 F.3d 1312 (2008) Dory ZATUCHNI, Executrix of the Estate of E. Barbara Snyder, deceased, Petitioner-Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellant. No. 2007-5034. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. February 12, 2008. *1313 Kevin P. Conway, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., of Bosto

506 F.Supp.2d 73 (2007) In re BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ERISA LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 06-10105-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 27, 2007. *74 Pavel Bespalko, Law Office of Joel, Eigerman, Laurence B. Cote', Joel Z. Eigerman, Attorney-at-Law, David Pastor, Gilman and Pastor, LLP, Thomas A. Reed, Holtz &