Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TIMOTHY J. HARRIS, on behalf of ) himself and derivatively on behalf of ) Harris FRC Corporation and The Mary ) Ellen Harris 2011 Grantor Retained ) Annuity Trust, ) ) Petitioner/Plaintiff, ) ) and )

596 F.3d 183 (2010) RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas W. BISHOP; Steven H. Hamant; Timothy E. Scanlon, Defendants-Appellants. No. 09-1038. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: October 27, 2009. Decided: February 22, 2010. *184 ARGUED: Jay J. Levit, La

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION On March 29, 2013, we issued a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’1 complaints, which alleged that they suffered injury based on the defendants’ manipulation of the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In re LIBOR-Base

2025 IL App (1st) 240220 Nos. 1-24-0220, 1-24-0322, 1-24-0945, 1-24-0951 (Cons.) Opinion filed March 31, 2025 FIRST DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE

Slip Op. 25-66 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC.; PLASTIC SERVICES AND PRODUCTS, LLC d/b/a GENOVA PIPE; MICROKITS, LLC; FISHUSA INC.; and TERRY PRECISION CYCLING LLC; Plaintiffs, v. Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Timothy M. Reif, Judge UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND

Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. AP Atl., Inc., 2019 NCBC 46. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 15 CVS 14745 (Master File) CRESCENT UNIVERSITY CITY VENTURE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AP ATLANTIC, INC. d/b/a ADOLFSON & PETERSON CONSTRUCTION, Defendant, v. MADISON CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.; TRUSSWAY MANUFACTURIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta

MEMORANDUM THOMAS A. WISEMAN, JR., Senior District Judge. Plaintiff Jones Express seeks damages for breach of contract. Based on all the proof before the Court, the Court finds that Jones Express, though entitled to a judgment of liability in its favor, is not entitled to recover the full amount of the damages it seeks. For the reasons set forth herein, judgment will enter in favor of Jones Exp

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this 'suit, Plaintiff Mark B. Price (“Price” or “Plaintiff’) seeks relief from alleged employment ' discrimination and breach of contract by Defendants Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. (“C & W”) and Joanne Podell (“Podell”). Plaintiff worked as a real es

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge Plaintiffs, Lubavitch-Chabad of Illinois, Inc. (“Lubavitch”); Lubavitch-Chabad of Evanston, Inc. d/b/a The Tannenbaum Chabad House (“the Tannenbaum House”); and Rabbi Dov Hillel Klein (“Rabbi Klein”) filed suit on September 21, 2012, alleging Defendants Northwestern University (“Northwestern”), Reverend Timothy Stevens,

756 F.Supp.2d 445 (2010) Carl BLESSING et al., Plaintiffs, v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC., Defendant. No. 09 CV 10035(HB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 17, 2010. *448 James Joseph Sabella, Jay W. Eisenhofer, Shelly L. Friedland, Mary Sikra Thomas, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Peter George Safirstein, Anne Kristi

MEMORANDUM DECISION TIMOTHY A. BARNES, Judge. The matter before the court arises out of the Third Amended Complaint [Adv. Dkt. No. 53] (the “Complaint”), filed by Attorneys’ Guaranty Title Fund, Inc. {“ATG ”) in the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the “Adversary ”), seeking a determination of dischargeability of debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and § 523(a)(6) against the d

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

271 F.Supp.2d 435 (2003) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, v. ACUSPORT, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. 99 CV 3999(JBW), 99 CV 7037(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 21, 2003. *436 *437 *438

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

291 B.R. 229 (2003) In re FIRST NEW ENGLAND DENTAL CENTERS, INC., Debtor. DentalNet, inc. F/K/A Boston Dental Group, Inc. and Dr. Charles C. Hur, Appellants, v. John J. Aquino, Creditors Trustee, Appellee. No. CIV.A. 02-12195-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 31, 2003. *230

20 F.Supp.2d 727 (1998) LAIDLAW, INC. and Laidlaw Transit, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. STUDENT TRANSPORTATION OF AMERICA, INC., Denis Gallagher, Robert H. Byrne, John Reddan, John Emberson, John Carey, Peter Pearson, and Thomas Gallagher, Defendants. No. CIV. 98-2241(WGB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 14, 1998. *728</

Government’s Financial Rescue and Takeover of American International Group (AIG); Fifth Amendment Taking and Illegal Exaction Claims; Shareholder Class Action; Demand for Corporate Equity and Voting Control as Consideration for Loan; Section 13(3), Federal Reserve Act; Effect of AIG Board’s Approval of Terms; Damages; Economic Loss Analysis. OPINION AND ORDER

2007 OK 12 OKLAHOMA ONCOLOGY & HEMATOLOGY P.C., an OKLAHOMA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, d/b/a CANCER CARE ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. US ONCOLOGY, INC., a DELAWARE CORPORATION, and AOR MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, INC., a DELAWARE CORPORATION, Appellees. No. 102673, Consol. w/102612 Supreme Court of Oklahoma March 15, 2007 Lana Jeanne Tyree, Cartwright & Tyre