Cases

683 F.Supp.2d 886 (2010) Olga WILSON, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1:08-cv-0523-TAB-RLY. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. January 29, 2010. Theresa L. Dapper, Glaser & Ebbs, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

635 F.Supp.2d 514 (2009) Kevin Lane BAKER, Plaintiff, v. Tim WILKINSON, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. CV05-1914-A. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. July 2, 2009. *515 Kevin Lane Baker, Winnfield, LA, pro se. Ronald E. Corkern, Jr., John Chris Guillet, Corkern & Crews, Natchitoch

BAKER, Judge. [1] Brian Young, Dave Wells, Steve Richmond, and Tim Corbett (collectively, the Officers) appeal the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint against Henry Davis. The Officers filed a lawsuit against Davis, a government employee, and two governmental agencies for actions he took while a government employee. After the Officers voluntarily dismissed the governm

SULLIVAN, Judge. hOn July 22, 2002, Dr. Tim Young Baker bought a home in Lafayette, Louisiana, from Francis Delhomme. After moving into the home, Dr. Baker filed a Petition in Redhibition, for Breach of Agency, and for Damages. He included his real estate agent, Dennis Brooks, and the real estate agency which employs Mr. Brooks, Stirling Properties, Inc., as defendants. These defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, w

In a consolidated action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the defendant Tim Baker, individually and doing business as Baker and Associates, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J.), dated April 5, 2004, which granted that branch of the motion of the plaintiff James Young which was to quash a subpoena duces tecum dated February 12, 2004, directing the Family Court of Orange County to produce all documents relat

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: After owners of a closely held corporation sold the company to its Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"), a participant in the ESOP brought this action. The participant contended that the trustee chosen for the ESOP by the corporation breached its fiduciary duties to the ESOP and overpaid for the stock - improperly enriching the corporation's owners

FILED September 19, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

446 F.Supp.2d 88 (2006) CONSTRUCTIVE HANDS, INC. f/k/a David Sior d/b/a Constructive Hands, Plaintiff, v. Tim B. BAKER and Unnamed 40' Ketch, her sails, engine, appurtenances, etc., in rem, Defendants. No. 1:04-CV-0939 (LEK/RFT). United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 8, 2006. *89 Kevin J. Keelan, Office of Kevin J.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1873 TIM P. BRUNDLE, on behalf of the Constellis Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Plaintiff - Appellee, and ANDREW HALLDORSON, on behalf of the Constellis Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and on behalf of a class of all other persons s

PER CURIAM. Pursuant to our prior decision in Sotolongo v. State, 530 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), in which we reversed the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence filed by appellant’s codefendant, and because the facts in both cases are indistinguishable, the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is reversed. We reject the state’s argument that the “good faith” exception to the warrant re

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1922 ___________________________ Stacey Eugene Johnson Plaintiff - Appellee v. Tim Griffin,1 Attorney General, in his official capacity; Erin Hunter, Sevier County Prosec

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS E. CREECH, No. 10-99015 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:99-cv-00224-BLW TIM RICHARDSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge,

*267 CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. In November 1992 a grand jury sitting in the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, returned a three-count indictment against defendants Tyrone Johnson, Thomas Johnson, and Richard Dover. Count 1 charged the defendants with conspiracy to possess with intent to dis

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-04-067 CV ____________________ ALLE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS E. CREECH, No. 10-99015 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:99- cv-00224-BLW v. ORDER AND AMENDED TIM RICHARDSON, Warden, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Ester V. Pafford, formerly a Wage and Hour Compliance Specialist (“Wage-Hour Investigator”) in the Wage and Hour Division of the Indianapolis District Office of the United States Department of Labor, filed suit against the Department of Labor under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., claiming denial of tr

JUSTICE SANDEFUR delivered the Opinion of the Court. *479 ¶1 The City of Deer Lodge, its mayor, one of its City Council members, and a private citizen (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the Third Judicial District Court’s j

992 S.W.2d 797 (1999) 338 Ark. 242 Jeanne BAKER, Maria Valencia, Tina Thomas, and Mirtha Breslin, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Arkansas Residents Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES DIVISION, a Division of American Home Products Corporation; Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Appellees. No. 98-1479. Supr

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00008-CV Jon C. Baker, Appellant v. Amanda D. Baker, Appellee FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-13-001369, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Jo

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 391 CA 16-01605 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. TIMOTHY KOPASZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CITY OF BUFFALO, LPCIMINELLI, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND LPCIMINELLI CONSTRUCTION CORP., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (PATRICK J. HINES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPEL