Cases

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 26, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00725-CR <

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00461-CV Erica BARRERA, Individually and as Next Friend of D.R., Minor; Michael Brown, Individually and as Next Friend of V.B., Minor; Jennifer Davis, Individually and as Next Friend of Z.D., Minor; Angeli Rose Gomez, Individually and as Next Friend of G.B. & A.G., Minors; Luz Hernandez,

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUGUST CABRERA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-3835 (JDB) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MARK ZAMBON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Civil Action No. 18-2065 (JDB)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Jesse Blount III, an African-American man, brings this employment discrimination suit against his employer, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (“MSSB”) and his supervisor at MSSB Jim Nielsen (“Nielsen”), alleging race discrimination and retaliation for prior claims against MSSB and Nielsen. Plaint

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Missouri and Illinois State Law Claims as a Class Action (ECF No. 138), Defendants’ Motion to Decertify Collective Class (ECF No. 145), Defendant Daniel Volmert’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 147), Defendant Julie Volmert’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No.

275 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2002) ELEANOR MCNAMARA-BLAD; KRISTEN ADAMS; MECHA ALLEN; AMANDA ALLGAIER; SHERRI AMES; AMBER ANDERSON; YVETTE ANKNER; RUTH ANOBA; RAMONA ARELLANO; SHAWN BAGNESHI; ELIZABETH BAILEY; CHANDRA BAKER; KIMBERLY BAKER; JEANNE BARRETT; CHRISTINA BAUER; KATIE BECKER; MISCHELLE BECKER; ANNETTE BENNETT; HELEN BENOIT; JANECE BERG; JEAN BIHLMEIER; CINDIE BLAKE; KYONG BLANCHETTE; LORI BUA; DIABOICE; KIM BOLDI; ERICA BOLLINGMO; TINA BONHOL

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-181 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE. [February 16, 2017] PER CURIAM. We have for consideration the regular-cycle report1 of The Florida Bar’s Code and Rules of Evidence Committee (Committee), concerning legislative changes to the Florida Evidence Code and to

NUMBER 13-07-00541-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Clerk’s No. 262); and (2)Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and Class Representative Service Awards (Clerk’s No. 263). A fairness hearing was held on January 21, 2016. Clerk’

NUMBER 13-07-00541-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE INTEREST OF C.C., D.W., JR., AND A.W., CHILDREN On appeal from the 267th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Mem

Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER BROOK FISHBECK, et al., ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et ai., Plaintiffs, Case No. 18-cv-2248 (CRC) V. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Public Version of ECF 387) I. BACKGROUND ......cccsc0 _ vee 3 II. LEGAL STANDARDS . 7 A. JURISDICTION AND LIABILITY ....sssccssssscsseeeecenees 7 B. DAMAGES 8 Ill. ANALYSIS 9 A. JURISDICTION AND LIABILITY 9 1. ATTACKS 1, 3-9, 11-19, 21-28, 30-39, 41-52, 5465... .ccccccseccseeneeees

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge. This putative class and collective action is before the Court on several related motions. Defendant Charter Communications, LLC (“Charter”) moves (Doc. No. 183) for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiffs’ request for class relief in their claim for unpaid overtime wages under the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act (“Kentucky Act”), Ky.Re

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MICHAEL H. DOLINGER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Ezequiel Gonzalez commenced this lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), alleging, inter alia, underpayment of wages and illegal tip retention. By letter dated November 24, 2014, the parties informed the District Court th

[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc