Cases

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 215 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION I integrity of this document No. CR-20-570 2023.06.27 11:41:31 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered: May 5, 2021 TIFFANY HARRIS

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TIFFANY HARRIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 154 CAF 12-01539 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF DELMAR GRICE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TIFFANY HARRIS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. JON STERN, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITION

Opinion issued January 14, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00736-CV ——————————— TIFFANY JOHNSON, Appellant V. HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

USCA11 Case: 24-10933 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 12/01/2025 Page: 1 of 15 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10933 ____________________ TIFFANY WINGO, as

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joan S. Kohout, J.), entered August 6, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted sole custody of the parties’ child to petitioner. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, awarded sole custody of the sub

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joan S. Kohout, J.), entered August 6, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted sole custody of the parties’ child to petitioner. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, awarded sole custody of the sub

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-206-CV HARRIS METHODIST SOUTHWEST HOSPITAL APPELLANT V. TIFFANY KN

JEFFREY W. BATES, J. Tiffany Harris (Harris) was charged by indictment with violating § 570.030 by stealing a laptop worth at least $500.1 On May 19, 2016, she pled guilty to that offense. That same day, she received a five-year sentence. On August 23, 2016, our Supreme Court decided State v. Bazell ,

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-206-CV HARRIS METHODIST SOUTHWEST HOSPITAL APPELLANT V. TIFFANY KNIGHT APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

</

PER CURIAM. The outcome of this case is controlled by our contemporaneously issued opinion in Alexander v. Walker, 435 S.W.3d 789, 2014 WL 2535949 (Tex.2014) (per curiam). Though the court of appeals correctly held that the respondent was entitled to dismissal of the tort claims asserted against him, the court’s reasoning is incongruous with Alexand

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER OF ABATEMENT Appellate case name: Harris County Municipal Utility District 368, Roy Lackey, Tiffany Bishop, Sharon Cook, Allison Dunn and Eric Daniel v. Klein Independent School District Appellate case number: 01-21-00507-CV Trial court case number: 2021-08284 T

Opinion issued July 12, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00507-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 368, ROY LACKEY, TIFFANY BISHOP, SHARON COOK, ALLISON DUNN, AND ERIC DANIEL, Appellant

Memorandum Opinion and Order LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Tiffany and Company (“Tiffany and Co.”) and Tiffany (NJ), LLC (collectively, “Tiffany”) sue Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”), asserting claims under both federal and New York state law for trademark infringement, dilution, counterfeiting, unfair com

DUNCAN, P. J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for attempted misdemeanor fourth-degree assault, which was based on an incident involving his girlfriend’s 16-year-old daughter, E. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by admitting a recording of E’s 9-1-1 call after she failed to appear as a witness on the morning scheduled for trial. According to defendant, the admission of E’s out-of-court statement

OPINION OF THE COURT Gerald Harris, J. The defendant is charged with aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1]) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [3]). He moves to dismiss both counts as facially insufficient ánd on the further ground that the aggravated harassment statute is constitutionally overbroad. Defendant further moves to compel a bill of particulars

ALETA A. TRAUGER, United States District Judge Pending before the court is a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 195), filed by defendant Regions Financial Corporation and Regions Bank, as successor by merger to AmSouth Bank, N.A. (collectively "Regions"). The plaintiffs, Michael and Beverly Harris, have filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 199), to which Regions has filed a Reply (Docket No. 200). For the reasons