Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Thurman v. Terrell”
Lashawn Terrell Thurman v. State of Iowapublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1846 Filed October 7, 2020 LASHAWN TERRELL THURMAN, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mary E. Howes, Judge. The applicant appeals the district court decision denying his application for postconvi
Christopher Terrell Shipp v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
07/11/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 12, 2025 CHRISTOPHER TERRELL SHIPP v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2013-C-2700 Jennifer Smith, Judge ___________________________________
United States v. Thurmanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, District Judge. The Government has made pretrial motions for the admissibility of certain recorded jailhouse telephone conversations and for the testimony of a confidential source. All of which is to be used against Defendants in this case. The Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge who has produced a comprehensive seventy-four (74) page report and
State of Iowa v. Lashawn Thurmanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1672 Filed January 28, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. LASHAWN THURMAN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Nancy S. Tabor, Judge. Lashawn Terrell Thurman appeals his conviction for possession with intent to deliver. AFFIRMED.
Jacksonville Paper Company v. Thurmanpublic domain
Appellant appeals from a $12,500.00 judgment by appellee for the loss of the thumb and three fingers on his right hand while employed by appellant to operate a paper cutting machine. The gist of negligence charged was failure to maintain *Page 907 the machine in a reasonably safe condition. Pleas of not guilty and contributory negligence were interposed. The latter went out on demurrer and the case was tried in keeping with such ruling. It is claim
Thurman v. Statepublic domain
Plaintiff in error, who was defendant in the court below, was indicted by a grand jury in Clay County for the violation of Section 7657, Comp. Gen. Laws; was found guilty, and a judgment of conviction and sentence to the penitentiary imposed. The indictment charged that the defendant, in a place known as the Silver Wing Club, *Page 427 a certain building in the town of Orange Park, in said county, had unlawfully kept and maintained in his possession a gam
State v. Terrellpublic domain
CORFMAN, C. J. The defendant was charged by the information in two counts: (1) Assault with intent to commit murder; and (2) assault with a deadly weapon with intent to do bodily harm. A plea of not guilty was entered to each count of the information, and upon the- trial the defendant was convicted of an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to do bodily harm, and was sentenced by the court to an indeterminate term of imp
Terrell v. State Ex Rel. Johnsonpublic domain
This is an action to recover the sum of $25,000 on the supersedeas bond of Ray Terrell given to obtain his release from the penitentiary pending an appeal from a judgment and sentence against him in the district court of Pawnee county, Okla., wherein he was convicted of the crime of burglary with explosives, and sentenced to serve a term of 20 years in the penitentiary. The supersedeas bond was fixed in the trial court at $50,000, and after the petition in error and case-made were filed in th
Terrell Wells Health Resort, Inc. v. Severeidpublic domain
This suit was instituted by H. L. Severeid as next friend for his minor daughter, Jane Marie Severeid, against the Terrell Wells *Page 528 Health Resort, Inc., appellant herein. The nature of the cause of action alleged is, in substance, that on July 5, 1933, said Jane Marie Severeid in company with two of her neighbor friends, both minors, and the father of one of them, went to the resort of the appellant for the purpose of swimming; that the appellant o
Thurman v. Western Union Telg. Co.public domain
Opinion of the Court ,by Judge Settle Reversing. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson circuit court, common pleas branch, second division, sustaining a demurrer to and dismissing appellant’s petition. The object of the action was to recover of appellee damages alleged to have, been sustained by appellant on account of its failure to deliver within a reasonable time the follow
Gordon v. Cummingspublic domain
561 S.W.2d 285 (1978) Terrel GORDON, Appellant, v. Gordon L. CUMMINGS et al., Appellees. No. 77-169. Supreme Court of Arkansas, Division 1. February 6, 1978. Rehearing Denied March 13, 1978. *286 Thurman & Everett by John C. Everett, Prairie Grove, for appellant. Murphy & Carlisle by Marshal N. Car
Branson v. Newburgh Police Departmentpublic domain
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS NEW-BURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT’S AND TOWN OF NEW-BURGH’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge. Defendants, Newburgh Police Department (“NPD”) and the Town of Newburgh (the “Town”) (collectively, “Defendants”), move for partial summary judgment as to all claims except Plaintiff Kara Branson’s (“Branson”) state law tort claim for assault. Specifically, Defendant
United States v. 19673 Los Alimos Streetpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Solomon and Lily Tekle appeal pro se the district court’s summary judgment for the United States in a civil forfeiture action against $98,656.60 in U.S. currency, representing the proceeds of the sale of defendant real property located at 19673 Los Alimos Street, Chatsworth, California. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s denial of a motion t
Dales v. bridgestone/firestonepublic domain
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission, upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms with modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following Opinion and Award. ***********
Christmas v. Statepublic domain
10 So.3d 413 (2009) Chancellor CHRISTMAS v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2007-KA-01450-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 2, 2009. Rehearing Denied June 18, 2009. *415 Donald W. Boykin, Jackson, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by La Donna C. Holland, attorney for appellee.
State of Tennessee v. Caleb Josiah Cannonpublic domain
08/16/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CALEB JOSIAH CANNON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2015-D-2410 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge No. M2019-01629-
Boaz v. Federal Express Corp.public domain
742 F.Supp.2d 925 (2010) Margaret BOAZ, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION d/b/a Fedex Express and Fedex Customer Information Services, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:09-cv-02232-dkv. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. September 24, 2010. *927 Stephen H. Biller, The Biller Law Firm, Memphis, TN, for P
Aymond v. Dupreepublic domain
928 So.2d 721 (2006) Gregory R. AYMOND v. Rich DUPREE. No. 05-1248. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 12, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 7, 2006. *723 Ronald J. Fiorenza, Provosty, Sadler, deLaunay, Fiorenza & Sobel, Alexandria, LA, Henry Howard Lemoine, Jr., Lemoine & Wampler, Pineville, LA
Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t
Chancellor Christmas v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-KA-01450-SCT CHANCELLOR CHRISTMAS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/11/2007 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BOBBY BURT DELAUGHTER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DONALD W. BOYKIN ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL