⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Thurman v. Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC”

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2025-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
BAP Appeal No. 25-9 Docket No. 48 Filed: 09/29/2025 Page: 1 of 27 NOT FOR PUBLICATION1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ IN RE FRONTLINE MEDICAL BAP No. CO-25-009 SERVICES LLC, Debtor. __________________________________
Utah Supreme Court · 2016-05-16 · Published · cited 87× · 2016 UT 20; 372 P.3d 629; 2016 WL 2866139
Chief Justice DURRANT, opinion of the Court: Introduction T1 This case concerns a dispute about proprietary plans to develop a power plant. USA Power, LLC engaged in extensive work to research and develop a power plant project in Mona, Utah-its Spring Canyon "vision." It claims that this vision is a trade secret, that PacifiCorp misapp
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-06-06 · Published · cited 1× · 511 B.R. 729; 2014 WL 2535543; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 2484; 59 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 165
*732OPINION1 ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is Craig Lehmann’s (“Debtor” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Adversary Proceeding (“Motion to Dismiss”). It prays for the dismissal of the Complaint Objecting to Discharge under Section 727(a)(2)2 of the Bankruptcy Code and O
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2016-08-22 · Published · cited 12× · 556 B.R. 266
MEMORANDUM OPINION Edward Ellington, Judge THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Adv. Dkt. #18) filed by Patrick C. Malouf and Porter & Malouf, P.A. and the Response in Opposi*270tion to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Adv. Dkt. #22) filed by James L. Henley, Jr., Chapter 13 Trustee. Havi
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2009-08-19 · Published · cited 6× · 413 B.R. 882
413 B.R. 882 (2009) In re: Steve Zimmer PAIGE, Debtor. Gary E. Jubber, Liquidating Trustee, and Consumerinfo.com, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Search Market Direct, Inc.; Stephen S. May; Chad Sayers; PSNet Communications; Randy Conklin; Mark Timothy; Promarketing Network, Inc.; and Does I Through X, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-34474. Adversary No. 06-02299. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah, Centra
District Court, N.D. New York · 2012-06-28 · Published · cited 27× · 877 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2012 WL 2522648
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Necdet Aktas and Lisa Filomia-Aktas commenced the within action against defendants alleging various claims arising out of work performed at their home on 223 Mill Creek Road in Adirondack, New York. Presently before the Court are the following motions: (1) defendant JMC Development Co., Inc. and Joseph M.
District Court, D. Oregon · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 3× · 129 F. Supp. 3d 1012; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118188; 2015 WL 5178073
OPINION &.ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Vesta Corporation brings this action against Defendants Amdocs Management Limited and Amdocs, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). . This Court previously granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s fraud claim and denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims of breach of contract and theft of trade secrets. Plaintiff amended
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012-08-17 · Published · cited 22× · 479 B.R. 746; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 3805
MEMORANDUM MARCIA PHILLIPS PARSONS, Chief Judge. Hulsing Hotels Tennessee, Inc. (“Huls-ing”) holds a state court judgment against Sleep Quest Diagnostics, LLC (“Sleep Quest”). In this adversary proceeding, Hulsing seeks to hold the debtors Edward Benjamin Steffner, Jr. and Pamela Denise Steffner liable for Sleep Quest’s judgment by piercing its corporate veil. Hulsing also seeks a denial of the Debtors’ di
Utah Supreme Court · 2016-05-16 · Published · cited 39× · 2016 UT 20
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2016 UT 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH USA POWER, LLC, USA POWER PARTNERS, LLC, and SPRING CANYON ENERGY, LLC, Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. PACIFICORP, App
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2014-09-22 · Published · cited 2× · 521 B.R. 576
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VACATING THE BANKRUPTCY COURT’S ORDER GRANTING SPECIAL PACA TRUST COUNSEL’S THIRD INTERIM APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is an appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting Special PACA Counsel Craig A. Stokes (“Special Counsel”) his Third and Final Fee Application brought by Appellants Kingdom Fresh Produce
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012-02-06 · Published · cited 13× · 850 F. Supp. 2d 1120; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13945; 2012 WL 397437
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BANK OF NEW YORK’S, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S, AND BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP’S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED ON OCTOBER 12, 2011 J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On May 25, 2010, Plaintiff Perle Menashe (“Plaintiff’) filed this action alleging various claims against Defenda
District Court, C.D. California · 2011-08-11 · Published · cited 42× · 865 F. Supp. 2d 1002; 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1371; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89512; 2011 WL 3555610
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants WellPoint, Inc., United HealthGroup, Inc., and Inge-nix, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendants WellPoint, Inc., United HealthGroup, Inc., and Ingenix, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended MultiDistrict Litigation Complaint. The Court heard argument on
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 447 B.R. 475
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 2× · 447 B.R. 475; 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1312; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 672; 51 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 73
447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter