Cases

Case: 24-40472 Document: 95-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-40472 FILED

WALLACE, Judge. In Case No. 2D10-2977, Jana Thorpe, a professional guardian, appeals the circuit court’s order denying her any compensation for her services as the emergency temporary guardian of Mary K. Zwayer (the Ward). In Case No. 2D10-3402, Michael Love-Zwayer and Joan Duffee, who successfully petitioned for the creation of a guardianship for the Ward, appeal the circuit court’s order denying their attorneys any fees or

LAVELLE, P.J., Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1035. Plaintiffs are part-time police officers employed by defendant, the Borough of Jim Thorpe (Borough). Pursuant to a mandatory police training provision in the Act of June 18, 1974, P.L. 359, sec. 1 et seq., 53 P.S. §740 et seq.1, plaintiffs attended and successfully completed a program

111 Cal.Rptr.2d 2 (2001) 26 Cal.4th 876 29 P.3d 103 26 Cal.4th 876 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ward Francis WEAVER, Jr., Defendant and Appellant. No. S004665. Supreme Court of California. August 20, 2001. *13 Marvin Rous, San Francisco, and Mark

OPINION After a jury convicted Vernon Ellis Weaver of aggravated assault, the trial court assessed punishment at three years' confinement and a $1,000 fine. In a single point of error, Weaver contests the constitutionality of the statutory exemption from jury service for persons over sixty-five years of age. We overrule the point of error and, accordingly, affirm the trial court's judgment. WEAVER'S CLAIMS Weaver contends that the trial court

152 Ariz. 341 (1986) 732 P.2d 571 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Winifred L. THORPE, Deceased. Lucretia THORPE, Personal Representative of the Estate of Winifred L. Thorpe, Proponent-Appellant, v. Wilbur THORPE, Contestant-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CIV 8569. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. August 14, 1986. Reconsidera

OPINION JEFFREY S. BIVINS, J„ delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SHARON G. LEE, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, and HOLLY KIRBY, JJ., joined. We granted the application for permission to appeal of Jeremy Wendell Thorpe (“the Defendant”) in this case to determine whether the trial

ERWIN, Judge. Plaintiff presents four arguments on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to submit the issue of defendant’s willful and wanton negligence to the jury; (2) that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that plaintiff had no duty to anticipate the negligence of defendant since the jurors could not understand the issue of contributory negligence unless they understood that

MORRIS, J. Plaintiff’s only assignment of error is bottomed on whether the granting of defendant’s motion for nonsuit and the subsequent dismissal of plaintiff’s suit was error. In Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 168 S.E. 2d 47 (1969), the Court presents five rules to be followed when a motion for nonsuit is being considered. They are: “1. All the evidence which tends to support plaintiff’

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MILLENNIUM BODY ARMOR, INC., § AND MILLENNIUM ARMOUR No. 08-08-00132-CV CORPORATION, § Appeal from the Appellants, §

219 B.R. 890 (1998) In re Christopher Rdell WEAVER, a.k.a. CR Weaver, a.k.a. Art Weaver, Debtor. In re MWM, INC., a Montana Corporation, Debtor. Christopher Rdell WEAVER, Plaintiff. v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 96-52462-11, 96-52463-11, Adversary No. 97/00104. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana. March 30, 1998.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MILLENNIUM BODY ARMOR, INC., AND MILLENNIUM ARMOUR CORPORATION, Appellants, v. MCCOY WEAVER WIGGINS CLEVELAND ROSE RAY, PLLC AND THORP, CLARKE & NEVILLE, P.A.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Emily Fitzmorris, et al. v. Case No. 21-cv-25-PB Opinion No. 2024 DNH 003 New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Commissioner Lori Weaver, et al. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On November 27, 2023, I certified a class of certain participants in New Hampshire’s Choices for

Mr. Justice Windes delivered the opinion of the Court. December 20, 1882, the Aetna Life"Insurance Co. issued to Edward L. Weaver its policy of insurance for $2,000.00 on his life, and payable to his estate. October 8, 1892, Weaver went with his brother-in-law, Edgar M. Snow, to the office of the agent of the company in Chicago, for

Buchanan, Y. C. The bill is filed for the partition of three parcels of land, designated in the bill as tracts A, B and C. No facts are in dispute, although, there being an infant defendant, proofs were taken in open court. The devolution of title to tracts B and C comes through the will of the former owner (Mary Winter), whereby an equitable life estate was given to Susan B. Patterson, with an equitable

By JUDGE SAFFOLD. This contest resolves itself entirely into the question, whether the covenants' of the parties respectively were dependent, or mutual and independent. For the plaintiff in error, it is argued that Chil-dress, the plaintiff below, was not entitled to recover, without proving that he was ready and able to convey a good title, as averred in his declaration, on the day appointed by the covenant, which facts were d

*72 MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. Four national environmental groups brought this suit against several federal agencies to challenge the approval of two oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. The agencies have moved to transfer the case to the Souther

791 F.Supp.2d 1158 (2011) DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, et al., Defendants, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., et al., Intervenor-Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0254-WS-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 23, 2011. *1160 Catherine M. W

JUSTICE FERNANDEZ-VINA delivered the opinion of the Court. **118In this case the Court is tasked with determining whether an electrical inspector is entitled to qualified immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, or absolute immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:3-5 or -7, pursuant to the Tort Claims Act (TCA). The case stems from a tragic fire in the City of Pat

Re Document No.: 60, 63, 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION GraNting Federal-Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting In-tervenor-Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION