Cases

Morris, J.- Appeal from a decree of foreclosure of mortgage, upon a defense of usury. There is no statement of facts in this case, and the question submitted must be determined upon our holding as to the decree being justified by the findings of fact, from which it appears, that on February 17, 1906, appellants Koch, being indebted to Daniel Schulz in the sum of $8,400, executed and delivered to Schulz the following instrument:<

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries and damages to his automobile, resulting from a collision with the automobile of the defendants, who, by cross-complaint, prayed recovery for personal injuries and damages to their automobile. The cause was tried to the court, which found that the defendants' negligence was the proximate cause of the *Page 178 accident. From judgment for five hundred dollars in favor of the plaintiff, the defe

This is an action begun by the plaintiff to recover for injuries to himself and to his automobile occasioned by the collision with the automobile of the respondent, who, in turn, has counterclaimed for damages done to his car. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in the dismissal of both the complaint and the cross-complaint, from which judgment the plaintiff appeals. The statement of facts forces us to the conclusion that the preponderance of the evidence is ag

The plaintiff, Thomson, seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries claimed as the result of being struck by one of the city's street cars while it was being negligently operated by one of the city's employees. The case proceeded to trial in the superior court for King county, sitting with a jury. By appropriate motions made at the close of the plaintiff's evidence and at the close of all of the evidence, counsel for the city challenged the sufficiency of the evidence

This is an appeal by a number of the legatees named as such in the will of John Thomson, deceased, from a decree of distribution rendered in the administration of his estate by the superior court for Whitman county. The controlling facts are not in dispute. On February 10, 1920, John Thomson, a bachelor seventy years old, and a resident of Whitman county, duly executed his last will and testament. Aside from giving directions for his burial, payment of his debts and expenses of adminis

EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Canyon County from a ruling that an insured was not entitled to an award of prejudgment interest on a sum owing for a fire loss because under the terms of the insurance policy payment was not due until the amount of the loss was ascertained by arbitration. We affirm the judgment of the district court. I. <

252 P.3d 98 (2011) FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Respondent, v. John SCHROCK, Stacy Schrock, and Christina Monroe, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants, and Lisa Schrock, Christa Springer, April Seitzinger, and Michele Runyan, Defendants-Appellants. No. 37172. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2010 Term. March 22, 2011.

256 P.3d 755 (2011) Janet Bell NIGHTENGALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kevin Matthew TIMMEL, M.D., Defendant-Respondent. No. 37226. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, June 2011 Term. July 11, 2011. *757 Dinius & Associates, PLLC, Nampa, for appellant. Michael J. Hanby argued. Powers Tolman, PLLC, Twin Falls, for respondent. J

W. JONES, Justice. I. Nature of the Case Lucia Navo, Serena Navo, and Nicole Navo (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the dismissal on summary judgment of a ease arising out of the death of Ellery Navo (“Navo”) during a surgery at Bingham Memorial Hospital (“Respondent” or “BMH”). Appellants argued that BMH was liable both for its own negligence and

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: This case arises out of the 2012 merger of two health care providers in Nampa, Idaho. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the State of Idaho sued, alleging that the merger violated § 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and state law; two local hospitals filed a similar complaint. Although the district court believed th

152 P.3d 558 (2007) Mary MORELAND, Casey Moreland, Amy Boyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Royce ADAMS, Randy Adams, Defendants-Respondents, and John Does and Jane Does 1 through X, individuals; and Corporations A through Z; and General Corporations AA through DD, and their heirs, successors and assigns, Defendants. No. 32284. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, November 2006 Term.

514 F.3d 1106 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alden Harmen CHEE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-4057. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 29, 2008. *1107 *1108 *1109 Karin Fojtik, Assistant United States Attorney (Bre

BEVAN, Justice. A jury found David Leon Johnson ("Johnson") guilty of two counts of lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen. Johnson appeals, arguing that the district court erred in multiple ways and that his convictions should be vacated. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August, 24, 2005, Johnson was indicted on three counts of lewd conduct with a minor child

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 42540 LUCIA NAVO, an individual, SERENA ) NAVO and NICHOLE NAVO, individuals ) by and through Val Navo as guardian, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants- ) Boise, January 2016 Term Cross Respondents, ) ) 2016 Opinion No. 47 v.

995 P.2d 816 (2000) 134 Idaho 46 Pauline Collins PERRY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a political subdivision of Twin Falls County, Defendant-Appellant. No. 24709. Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, November 1999 Term. February 28, 2000. *818 Tolman Law Office, Twin Falls,

75 P.3d 1202 (2003) 139 Idaho 192 William LEVINGER, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, NAMPA, Defendant-Respondent, and Coastal Emergency Medical Group, Inc., dba Coastal Physician, Services of the West, Inc., dba Anesthesia Partners, Inc.; Robert Fale and John Does I—X, whose true Identities are presently unknown, Defendants. No. 27591. Supreme Court of Ida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 42611 CHARLES BALLARD, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) Boise, June 2016 Term BRIAN CALDER KERR, M.D., SILK ) TOUCH LASER, LLP, an Idaho limited )

888 P.2d 680 (1994) Kirk W. DALL, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE of Utah, The Utah State Board of Pardons, and The Utah State Psychiatric Security Review Board, Respondents and Appellees. No. 930722-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. December 27, 1994. *681 Mark R. Moffat and Robert K. Heineman, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

948 S.W.2d 941 (1997) The HARRISON COUNTY FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK, LLP, Appellee. No. 06-97-00006-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Argued June 24, 1997. Decided July 9, 1997. Rehearing Overruled August 5, 1997. *943 James W. Hill, Longview, for Appellant.

Mr. Justice Thomson delivered the opinion of the court. This was an action wherein the appellee, Edward A. Nixon, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, sought to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the construction of a branch tunnel in the alley immediately south of the Unity Building in the City of Chicago, under a permit issued by the appellant, the said Ci