Cases

232 S.W.3d 316 (2007) Stacy THOMPSON and Sean Denzil Thompson, Appellants, v. James J. WOODRUFF, Duane L. Larson, and Scott Kacy, Appellees. No. 09-05-511 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted on May 3, 2007. Decided August 2, 2007. *317 Denise W. Novotny, Novotny Legal Group, Houston, for appellants

This appeal arises from postdivorce proceedings in the Jefferson Circuit Court. Chivers Richard Woodruff, Jr. ("the husband"), appeals from the order of the trial court as to the parties' respective petitions for a rule nisi; Julia Mariani Woodruff ("the wife") cross-appeals. On January 14, 2008, the trial court held an ore tenus hearing on the parties' respective petitions and amended petitions. After the hearing, the court entered an order requiring the husband to pay the wife $27,5

PITTMAN, Judge. This appeal, transferred to this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala.Code 1975, arises from proceedings removed from the Cleburne Probate Court to the Cleburne Circuit Court involving the estate of Beatrice Calhelhas (“the decedent”), who died testate on July 29, 2010. The decedent’s will named as executrix one of her five daughters, Beatrice Woodraff (“the executrix”), and the executrix petitioned the probate c

THOMAS, Judge, On July 7, 2014, Gazebo East Apartments (“the landlord”) served on Edward Woodruff (“the tenant”) two documents: a 30-day notice of nonrenewal of the parties’ current lease and a 14-day . notice of lease termination for cause. The lease between the landlord and the tenant indicated that the lease term began,on August 21, 2013, and ended on July 31, 2014, The lease also provided that “[t]his. lease contract w

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-05-511 CV

632 S.E.2d 662 (2006) 280 Ga. 757 WOODRUFF et al. v. GOULD et al. No. S06A1061. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 13, 2006. W. Carl Reynolds, Katherine Lee McArthur, Bradley J. Survant, Reynolds, McArthur & Horne, Macon, for appellants. Jack G. Slover, Jr., Shaun M. Daugherty, Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, P.C., William P. Keenan,

[Cite as State v. Woodruff, 2024-Ohio-4926.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2024-CA-11 : v.

76 Wn. App. 207 (1994) 883 P.2d 936 RICHARD C. WOODRUFF, Respondent, v. RICHARD SPENCE, ET AL, Appellants. No. 13278-1-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. November 17, 1994. As amended by order January 30, 1995. Nicholas L. Clapham, for appellants. Richard L. Jones and Miller &

573 P.2d 206 (1978) Charlotte M. WOODRUFF, Appellant, v. William E. WOODRUFF, Respondent. No. 8930. Supreme Court of Nevada. January 9, 1978. Robert A. Grayson, Carson City, for appellant. Manoukian, Scarpello & Alling, Ltd., and Milton Manoukian, Carson City, for respondent. *207 OPINION GUNDE

McFADDEN, Judge. A jury convicted Donald Lee Woodruff of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession of morphine, and possession of oxycodone. On appeal, Woodruff argues that the trial court erred by failing to require the state to disclose the identity of a confidential informant, but the confidential informant was a mere tipster, so the trial court did not er

[Cite as State v. Woodruff, 2013-Ohio-4251.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 25610 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 12-CR-2951 v.

Dillard, Judge. In this interlocutory appeal, J anice D. Rogers challenges the trial court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment on Cory Wood-ruff’s personal-injury claims related to an incident that occurred at Rogers’s home when a deck railing gave way and Woodruff fell to the concrete below, resulting in serious injuries. On appeal, Rogers argues that the trial court er

06/07/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 4, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JONATHAN E. WOODRUFF Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 20-640 Joseph T. Howell, Judge ___________________________________

ACCEPTED 07-14-00339-CR SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 7/14/2015 5:19:51 PM

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Karen Marlene Thompson and Annette Shack seek to appeal from the order of the district court denying their objections to the settlement of a class action lawsuit. *336In case number 03-2392, we dismiss Shack’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction because her notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are acc

MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER JOHN J. THARP, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff Barbara Woodruff sued Huma-na Pharmacy, Inc., in the Circuit' Court of *590Cook County, alleging that negligence in the untimely filling and shipping of her mail-order prescription drugs caused her to have a stroke. Humana removed the ease to this Court,

Andrew McClain, J., delivered the opinion of the court. In this cause there was a demurrer to the hill which was overruled, and the defendants have appealed from that decree to this Court. In the bill it is- charged that complainant, in 1864, through his agents in Memphis, Tennessee, shipped to defendants, at New York, 164 bales of cotton to be sold, and the proceeds held subject to complain

02/09/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 5, 2021 Session ROBERT MARTIN THOMPSON v. CHRISTIE LEE THOMPSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County No. 2015-CV-229 Amy V. Hollars, Judge ___________________________________

OPINION CANTRELL, Judge. The plaintiff, a candidate for the United States Senate, filed two actions in the Chancery Court of Davidson County alleging that giving or receiving campaign contributions violates state law. The court dismissed both actions. We agree that the lower courts properly dismissed plaintiffs claims, because the regulation

Andrew McClain, J., delivered the opinion of the court. In this cause there was a demurrer to the hill which was overruled, and the defendants have appealed from that decree to this Court. In the bill it is- charged that complainant, in 1864, through his agents in Memphis, Tennessee, shipped to defendants, at New York, 164 bales of cotton to be sold, and the proceeds held subject to complain