Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MIRAMAR POLICE OFFICERS’ RETIREMENT ) PLAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9860-CB ) K. RUPERT MURDOCH, PETER L. BARNES, ) JOSÉ MARÍA AZNAR

IH THE COURT OF APPEALS FORTH? FIRST Jjl Itf//T) Q^M-fiP. c^t No. m$qv\ mww MMSJ W 05 2015 \%U£3 chhistopHbr Xn rey Overt Ik Anton Thompson, Relator, V, Susan &roWh ± Respondent, ES0085-01-07 IVENJ3TY'OF ftfcTXES

0%9/S 090-/S po-oo^-i5 ORIGINAL ;r courtofcriwalappSls MAR 20 2015 KdQJAj/J^/ uoajelI InA/m&SesU Abel Acosta, Clerk v/. .., FILED IN Abel Acosta, Clerk £ausc MurYibe*- F-'WWISH-L **J F~i/k/7&3-L naotlhnh rgJ-U'i

IH THE COURT OF APPEALS FORTH? FIRST Jjl Itf//T) Q^M-fiP. c^t No. m$qv\ mww MMSJ W 05 2015 \%U£3 chhistopHbr Xn rey Overt Ik Anton Thompson, Relator, V, Susan &roWh ± Respondent, ES0085-01-07 IVENJ3TY'OF ftfcTXES

655 F.Supp.2d 607 (2009) Elze T. MEIJER and Marcel Windt, solely in their capacity as Trustees in Bankruptcy for KPNQwest, N.V., a Dutch corporation, and Global TeleSystems Europe Holdings, B.V., a Dutch corporation, Plaintiffs, v. H. Brian THOMPSON, Defendant. No. 1:08cv673 (LMB/TRJ). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. September 4, 2009.

ACCEPTED 01-15-00010-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 5:17:36 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 25-31 (BAH) ADRIAN THOMPSON, Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Adrian Thompson faces a jury trial

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS] 12th Court of Appeals District Appellate Docket Number: Appellate Case Style: Vs. K^^> TH^PSO^f TYLERTEXAS- Companion Case No.:

644 F.Supp. 393 (1985) POLICE OFFICERS FOR EQUAL RIGHTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., Defendants. No. C-2-78-394. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. January 8, 1985. *394 *395 *396 Alexander M. Spater, Columbus, Ohio, for plai

Appellate rJocket Number: IgSf^^'glS^^E HFCEIVifD IN Appellate Case Style: Vs. ;ac. i m i tfcj] W kW I V Dt.bra Au-lrev, CisrK

VOGEL, Justice (dissenting). The Ward County Canvassing Board, in the performance of its duties, certified Norma Kuhn as one of the two persons receiving the highest number of votes for the two legislative positions in Legislative District No. 41. Janet Wentz, who received the third highest number of votes, demanded a recount. When the State Board of Canvassers met, the recount had not been c

457 S.W.2d 398 (1970) Andrew Z. THOMPSON et al., Appellants and Appellees, v. The CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS et al., Appellants and Appellees, No. 11765. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin. July 22, 1970. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1970. *399 Turman & Mitchell, Graves, Dougherty, Gee, Hearon, Moody & G

123 Utah 81 (1953) 254 P.2d 1047 COX v. THOMPSON. No. 7796. Supreme Court of Utah. Decided March 23, 1953. *82 Brant H. Wall and Jay Elmer Banks, Salt Lake City, for appellant. Stewart, Cannon & Hanson and Edward M. Garnett, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

On the sixth day of October, 1914, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement by the terms of which they agreed to settle a controversy existing between them "with respect to their rights in the growing and down timber" standing and lying upon certain designated land. The terms of the agreement were in substance these: Within thirty days after the report of "arbitrators" who were to be chosen by the parties according to the method provided by the contract, the plaintiff p

Beck, J. I. The note declared upon is in the following language: “$150.00. “Twenty months after date, we, or either of us, promise to pay John Morgan or order, the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars, for value received. Given under our hand and seal, this 29th day of January, 1863. his Alexander X Mason, [seal.

BROWN, District Judge. The bill charges infringement of letters patent No. 674,009, May 14, 1901, to C. W. Lewis, for a knockdown paper box. The claims are as follows: *912“1. A knockdown box made from stiff, cellular paper fabric, in three separable or distinct parts folded and telescoped together, each of the six sides of sai'd box consisting

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Nereida Rivera-Colón ("Rivera") filed suit against her former employer, AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc. ("AT&T"), 1 alleging age discrimination and wrongful termination. After AT&T pulled out its arbitration agreement with Rivera, the district court sent the parties packing to arbitrate. Ri

120 F.3d 1045 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6113, 97 Cal. DailyOp. Serv. 6333,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6442,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6548,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6627,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,204,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,529,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,802,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,973Thomas Martin THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.Arthur CALDERON, Warden of the California State Prison atSan

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FUSTE, District Judge. This case is before the court on defendants Compagnie Generale Maritime and Interline Connection, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment, alleging that there is no genuine controversy of facts impeding the application of a six-month statute of limitations barring plaintiffs action. The court finds that the action is time-barred and orders the dismissal

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. This is an insurance case grounded on diversity. The parties agree that the policy in question provides coverage for a particular loss of perishable foodstuffs. So that’s the easy part. What the parties need us to decide is exactly how much coverage there is — $500,000 or $25,000? For the reasons below, we agree with the district court’s answer: $25,000.