Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Thomas v. Wichita, Kansas, City of”
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Harold Peterson brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1982) (Title VII), alleging that the City of Wichita, Kansas, had illegally discharged him on the basis of race. The district court dismissed the suit, concluding that Peterson had failed to file a timely charge with the EEOC as required by section 2000e-5 because t
729 F.Supp. 1282 (1990) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF KANSAS, INC., and Sharilyn Young, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WICHITA; Bob Knight, Greg Ferris, Frank Ojile, Estella Martinez, Willis Wall, U.L. "Rip" Gooch, Sheldon Kamen, in Their Capacity as Mayor and Members of the Wichita City Council, Governing Body of the City of Wichita, a City of the First Class; the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Sedgwick; Bernard A. Hentzen, Mark Schroeder, Dave
Jack v. City of Wichitapublic domain
23 Kan. App.2d 606 (1997) 933 P.2d 787 KENNETH JACK and ALLISON JACK, Appellants, v. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS; and PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, P.A.; Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and ARMSTRONG LAND SURVEY, P.A.; DONALD ARMSTRONG; FIRSTIER MORTGAGE COMPANY; and PAULA M. WHILLOCK, Appellees. No. 74,256. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed Marc
Unruh v. City of Wichitapublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,254 JASON UNRUH, Appellant, v. CITY OF WICHITA, ET AL., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Civil battery and negligence are discrete con
City of Wichita v. Trotterpublic domain
No. 122,007 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CITY OF WICHITA, Appellant, v. ARLANDO TROTTER, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Whether jurisdiction exists is a question of law over
City of Wichita v. Trotterpublic domain
No. 121,125 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CITY OF WICHITA, Appellee, v. ARLANDO TROTTER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A challenged regulatory framework comes before the court cloaked in
City of Wichita v. Ricepublic domain
20 Kan. App. 2d 370 (1995) CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Appellee, v. MICHAEL D. RICE, Appellant. No. 71,245 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed January 13, 1995. Thomas W. Young and Stephen M. Kerwick, of Foulston & Siefkin, of Wichita, for appellant. *371 Sharon L. Dickgrafe, assistant city atto
Wahl v. City of Wichita, Kan.public domain
701 F.Supp. 1530 (1988) Charles G. WAHL, Dale E. Coffman, Richard A. Alvarez, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Defendant. No. 88-1424-K. United States District Court, D. Kansas, December 21, 1988. Ray E. Simmons, Ken M. Peterson, Robert W. Coykendall, Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, Wic
Wahl v. City of Wichita, Kan.public domain
725 F.Supp. 1133 (1989) Charles G. WAHL, Dale E. Coffman, Richard A. Alvarez, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Defendant. No. 88-1424-K. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 13, 1989. *1134 *1135 Ray E. Simmons,
Smart v. City of Wichitapublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 26, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of
Nelson v. City of Wichita, Kansaspublic domain
217 F.Supp.2d 1179 (2002) Gay Lynne NELSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION No. 01-2121-CM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 22, 2002. *1180 Carl A. Gallagher, Patrice M. Brown, McAnany, Van Cleave & Phillips, P.A., Kansas City, KS, for plaintiff. Edward L. Keeley,
Estate of Randolph v. City of Wichitapublic domain
No. 118,842 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Estate of ICARUS RANDOLPH, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, et al., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Standards for granting summary judgm
Steele v. City of Wichitapublic domain
250 Kan. 524 (1992) 826 P.2d 1380 ROBERT STEELE, SHELDON WULF, RONALD WAITS, GARY DAVIS, GARETH SMITH, BILL WARFIELD, JAMES WALTERS, and EMERY L. GOAD, Appellants, v. CITY OF WICHITA, Appellee. No. 67,057 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed February 28, 1992. Joseph H. Cassell, of Cassell and Lower, of Wichita, argued the cause, and
City of Wichita v. Wallacepublic domain
246 Kan. 253 (1990) 788 P.2d 270 THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Appellant, v. BOBBIE L. WALLACE, Appellee. No. 63,105 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed March 2, 1990. Ed L. Randels, assistant city attorney, argued the cause, and Thomas R. Powell, city attorney, was with him on the brief for appellant. There was no appe
City of Wichita v. Kansas Corporation Commissionpublic domain
225 Kan. 524 (1979) 592 P.2d 880 THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, A Municipal Corporation, Appellee, v. THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS; G.T. VAN BEBBER, Chairman; WILLIAM G. GRAY and R.C. LOUX, Commissioners, and their Respective Successors in Office, as Members of the State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas, Appellant. No. 49,878 Supreme Court o
McDonald v. City of Wichitapublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge Mary McDonald brings employment claims against the City of Wichita, Kansas and Gary Rebenstorf. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that Rebenstorf deprived her of First Amendment right to free speech and free association and denied her equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment in violation of 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. Plaintiff claims that t
Thomas v. CITY OF BAXTER SPRINGS, KAN.public domain
369 F.Supp.2d 1291 (2005) Ronald O. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAXTER SPRINGS, KANSAS, Donna Wixon and Robert Myers, Defendants. No. 04-2257-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 10, 2005. *1292 *1293 Brennan P. Fagan, William J. Skepnek, Skepnek Law Firm, PA, Lawrence, KS, Sam
City of Wichita v. Molitorpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Johnson, J.: A law enforcement officer participating in a saturation patrol near a Wichita bar stopped a vehicle driven by William J. Molitor and subsequently conducted a driving under the influence (DUI) investigation. After Molitor failed the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test but passed the walk-and-tum and one-leg-stand tests, the officer requested a preliminary b
Armco Steel v. City of Kansas Citypublic domain
883 S.W.2d 3 (1994) ARMCO STEEL, et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, Missouri, et al., Appellants. No. 76094. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. August 15, 1994. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing September 20, 1994. *4 Kathleen A. Hauser, Acting City Atty., Patricia R. Jensen, Asst. City Atty., Kansas
City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.public domain
828 F.Supp. 851 (1993) CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, A Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-1331-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 14, 1993. *852 Charles P. Efflandt, Robert L. Howard, Foulston & Siefkin, Thomas R. Powell, Hinkle, Eberhart & Elko