Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

514 F.Supp.2d 139 (2007) GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. ARCHITECTURAL ENVIRONMENTS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-12356-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 14, 2007. *140 Kevin J. Hughes, Martin P. Duffey, Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, Patrick J. Loftus, III, Law Offices

Justice KAVANAUGH, concurring. When an inmate raises an as-applied constitutional challenge to a particular method of execution-that is, a challenge to a method of execution that is constitutional in general but that the inmate says is very likely to cause him severe pain-one question is whether the inmate must identify an available alternative method of execution that would significantly reduce the risk of severe pain

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA PARENTS FOR THE No. 19-15607 EQUALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS; ARVIND RAGHAVAN, D.C. No. individually and as parent and next 3:17-cv-00635- friend of M.R. and N.R.; CRB VISHNUKUMAR THUMATI, individually and as parent and next friend of P.T. and N.T.; SHAILESH OPINION SHILWANT, individually and as parent and next f

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. Opinion concurring in part in Part I filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. PER CURIAM: Table of Contents I. Batson..................................................................40 A. Batson Framework...................................................40 B. Strike-by-Strike Analysis............

Filed 2/18/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE HILJA KEADING et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, A151468, A153075 v. KENTON KEADING, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. MSP1600402)

Filed 2/25/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Siskiyou) ---- SISKIYOU HOSPITAL, INC., C097671, C098311 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. SCCV-CVPT-

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTEN BIEL, No. 17-55180 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-04248- TJH-AS ST. JAMES SCHOOL, A CORP., a California non-profit corporation; DOES, 2–50, inclusive; ST. JAM

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTEN BIEL, No. 17-55180 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-04248- TJH-AS ST. JAMES SCHOOL, A CORP., a California non-profit corporation; DOES, 2–50, inclusive; ST. JAM

WALTZER, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE This matter arises from a trial in process of plaintiffs’-relators’ petition alleging that Kenneth Dixon, a hemophiliac, became infected with HIV, the virus that causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) by having used factor concentrate, a blood derivative sold by defendants-respondents. On 20 November 1997, the trial court signed a Pre-Tr

677 N.W.2d 319 (2004) 469 Mich. 553 James LITTLE, Cheryl Little, Steven Ramsby, Mary Kavanaugh, Stanley W. Thomas, Nancy G. Thomas, Michael McCluskey, Gladys McCluskey, and Ann Skoglund, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellants, v. Betty H. HIRSCHMAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellee, and Gerald W. Carrier, Sally Ann Carrier, John P. Viau, and Genevieve Guenter Viau, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, and Frances J

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT Opinion filed by Burton, Chief Judge. This interlocutory appeal arises from the Military Commission Judge’s decision to “terminate! ] proceedings of the military commission with respect to a charge or specification”- , under 10 U.S.C. § 950d(a)(1), See Manual' for Military Commissions (2012) (M.M.C), Rule for'Military Commissions (R.M.C-) 908(a)(

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 4, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker F

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50107 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:10-cr-01805-JAH-1 DANIEL EDWARD CHOVAN, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge,

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan 48909 Chief Justice Justices Opinion Maura D. Corrigan Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 204–278 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 12-484C (Filed: June 27, 2019) ********************************** ) Patent case; motion for award of attorneys’ FASTSHIP, LLC, ) fees and expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § ) 1498(a); prevailing plaintiffs; jurisdict

Before WYNN, Circuit Judge, and OSTEEN, District Judge, and BRITT, Senior District Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION WYNN, Circuit Judge, wrote the opinion, in which BRITT, Senior District Judge, concurred. *799TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...801 A. T

417 B.R. 332 (2009) In re FINAL ANALYSIS, INC., Debtor. No. 01-21039-TJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Greenbelt. September 24, 2009. *334 Ann E. Schmitt, Washington, DC, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION THOMAS J. CATLIOTA, Bankruptcy Judge. In this Chapter 7 case of Debtor Final Analys