⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Thomas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company”

Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018-04-17 · Published · cited 15× · 911 N.W.2d 1; 380 Wis. 2d 727; 2018 WI 35
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. *730¶ 1 This is a review of an unpublished court of appeals summary disposition reversing the La Crosse County Circuit Court's1 foreclosure judgment against Thomas P. Wuensch in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Deutsche Bank).2 The circuit court a
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 932 F. Supp. 2d 95; 2013 WL 1191034; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41193
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Joel Robinson has filed this complaint challenging the foreclosure sale of his home. He sued defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”); Chase Bank; Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. (“Saxon”); the trustees designated in the deed of trust to his property; and Co
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-02-11 · Published · cited 1× · 57 So. 3d 1185; 2010 La.App. 1 Cir. 1453; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 179; 2011 WL 839719
McClendon, j. |2The defendant appeals a trial court judgment that granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied her exception of prematurity, denied her motion for summary judgment, and dismissed her reconventional demand. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This matter began as an exec
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-09-18 · Published · cited 82× · 871 F.3d 380; 2017 WL 4103749; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18083
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: The Burciagas defaulted on their home equity loan in 2011. In 2013, Deutsche Bank filed a foreclosure suit in Texas state court. Without holding a hearing—as required, by Texas law—the state court entered a foreclosure order. Although Texas law expressly required that any challenge to the foreclosure order be made in a separate, original proc
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 204 So. 3d 153; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17368
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Appellee’s Confession of Error, the circuit court’s Final Judgment Adopting Order Granting Motion for Directed Verdict, rendered August 10, 2015, is reversed and this cause is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED. LAWSON, C.J., PALMER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 627 F. App'x 282
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. brought suit in Virginia state court seeking rescission of a foreclosure sale that took place approximately four years earlier. The United States removed the action to district court and moved to dismiss pursuant to Fed,R.Civ.P. 12(b)(
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 201 So. 3d 128; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14469
PER CURIAM. Appellants seek review of the trial court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment, and the final judgment of foreclosure subsequently rendered below. We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure entered in this cause, and in doing so, determine that the trial court’s denial of Appellants’ motion for.summary judgment was right but for the wrong reason.
California Court of Appeal · 2015-04-29 · Published · cited 86× · 236 Cal. App. 4th 394; 15 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4221; 186 Cal. Rptr. 3d 625; 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 363
Opinion IKOLA, J. This case involves allegations of a wrongful foreclosure and related causes of action. Plaintiff John Miles appeals from a judgment dismissing his breach of contract, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation causes of action pursuant to a sustained demurrer, and a summary judgment in favor of defendants on the wrongful foreclosure cause of acti
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-02-10 · Published · cited 11× · 234 F. Supp. 3d 462; 2017 WL 564089; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19191
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff, Commerzbank AG (“Com-merzbank”), allegedly made 74 investments in 50 residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts (the “Trusts”) for which the defendant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), served as trustee. Commerzbank seeks to hold the defendant liable for the poor performance of Commerzbank’s inve
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-12-29 · Published · cited 54× · 775 F.3d 298; 2014 WL 7398656; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24527
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: John and Ivy Thompson appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Bank National Trust Company. The Thompsons brought this action in Texas state court under Section 50 of Article XVI of the Texas Constitution (“Section 50”), challenging the adequacy of a loan that they obtained in 2006. Although Deutsche was never properly served, the state cou
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-04-23 · Published · cited 16× · 137 So. 3d 562; 2014 WL 1612460; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5858
FORST, J. In this foreclosure action, Appellant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company appeals the trial court’s final judgment granting Appellees Robin and Thomas Huber’s motion for involuntary dismissal. Appellant argues that the trial court reversibly erred in two respects: (1) dismissing the action where Appellant presented the original promissory note at trial but moved a copy of the note into evidence;
California Court of Appeal · 2014-01-23 · Published · cited 57× · 223 Cal. App. 4th 261; 167 Cal. Rptr. 3d 173; 2014 WL 255587; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 57
Opinion ELIA, J. In May 2009, the United States Congress enacted the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 (PTFA or Act) (Pub.L. No. 111-22, div. A, tit. VH, §§ 702-704 (May 20, 2009) 123 Stat. 1660) and, in 2010, the Congress amended it (Pub.L. No. 111-203, tit. XIV, § 1484 (July 21, 2010)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 107 A.D.3d 931; 969 N.Y.S.2d 82
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Thomas J. Whalen appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated April 16, 2012, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs cross motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against him and dismissing his affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Ordered that the order is affirmed insof
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 112 So. 3d 668; 2013 WL 1810583; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6930
STONE, BARRY J., Senior Judge. Defendants (McColmans) appeal a summary final judgment and an order denying rehearing in a mortgage foreclosure. We affirm. The action was filed in mid-2009. The McColmans filed a motion to dismiss which was denied on May 9, 2011, the court giving the McColmans twenty days to answer. No answer or other paper was served or filed by the McColmans after the May 9 order. In July of
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 107 A.D.3d 931; 969 N.Y.S.2d 82
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Thomas J. Whalen appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated April 16, 2012, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs cross motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against him and dismissing his affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Ordered that the order is affirmed insof
Nevada Supreme Court · 2013-05-30 · Published · cited 112× · 129 Nev. 314; 302 P.3d 1103; 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 34; 2013 WL 2364178; 2013 Nev. LEXIS 45
OPINION By the Court, Pickering, C.J.: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has certified the following questions to this court: 1. Is a quiet title action under Nevada Revised Statutes § 40.010, which is premised on an allegedly invalid trustee’s sale under Nevada Revised Sta
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012-06-19 · Published · cited 11× · 44 A.3d 879; 136 Conn. App. 291; 2012 WL 2094379; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 286
44 A.3d 879 (2012) 136 Conn.App. 291 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Trustee, v. Thomas J. SHIVERS, Jr., et al. No. 32331. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued April 12, 2012. Decided June 19, 2012. J. Hanson Guest, for the appellant (named defendant). Jeffrey M. Knickerbocker, for the appellee (plaintiff).
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 89 So. 3d 996; 2012 WL 1698149; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7842
PER CURIAM. We reverse the summary final judgment granted below, which was based on the failure of one of the defendants to sign the applicable mortgage. The bank’s filing of the proper mortgage corrected the clerical error of the attachment of the wrong mortgage to an amended complaint. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company brought a mortgage foreclosure action against Damasino and Rosalinda Taperi. To
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2012-04-10 · Published · cited 16× · 81 Mass. App. Ct. 564; 965 N.E.2d 875
Wolohojian, J. The defendants (members of a single family) *565have occupied3 a dwelling at 195-197 Callender Street in the Dorchester section of Boston for over twenty-eight years. In 2006, defendant Quinton Gabriel was the property's owner,4 and he granted a mortgage to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), which
California Court of Appeal · 2012-03-16 · Published · cited 137× · 204 Cal. App. 4th 433; 138 Cal. Rptr. 3d 830; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 318
Opinion ELIA, vJ. —Plaintiff Stephen George Debrunner sought a declaratory judgment and quiet title to property on which nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings had been initiated by respondents Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Deutsche Bank), its loan servicer, and its foreclosure trustee. The superior court sustained respondents’ demurrer to the first amended complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiff appea