Cases

222 P.3d 370 (2009) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Maurice McNEELY, III, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06CA2519. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VII. May 28, 2009. *372 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Christopher Y. Bosch, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

[Cite as State v. Russell, 2025-Ohio-5306.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-23-1301 Appellant Trial Court No. CR0202301688 v. Anthony M. Russell DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellee

M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge. | TAppeIlant, Rhonda Russell, acting individually and as the representative of the estate of Larry Wayne Russell Sr., appeals from the order of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of appel-lees, Northeast Texas Land and Timber (NTLT) and Perry Steitler. We affirm the order of the circuit court. Larry Wayne Russell Sr. was killed

138 Ga. App. 310 (1976) 226 S.E.2d 112 McNEELY v. HARRISON et al. 51729. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued January 13, 1976. Decided March 19, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 2, 1976. Kemp & Ratcliffe, Thomas J. Ratcliffe, for appellant. Smith, Shepherd & Gary, Loren Gary, II, William

349 N.E.2d 204 (1976) Robert D. McNeely, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 1-276A14. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. June 22, 1976. Anthony Champa, Shelbyville, for defendant-appellant. Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Charles M. Russell, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for plaintiff-appellee. LOWDERMILK, Ju

OPALA, Justice. ¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether there was error in entering summary judgment for the county. We answer in the affirmative. I THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION ¶ 2 Ten deputy sheriffs of Carter County [deputies, deputy sheriffs or plaintiffs] commenced a breach-of-employment-contract action against the Board of County Commissioners [Board, cou

108 Ariz. 453 (1972) 501 P.2d 555 Opal McNEELY, In re Billy W. McNeely, Deceased, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Reynolds Metals Company, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier. No. 10934-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc. October 6, 1972. Rehearing Denied October 31, 1972.<

601 N.W.2d 426 (1999) 236 Mich. App. 696 Shirley A. GROW, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. W.A. THOMAS COMPANY and Dennis Arquette, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 209865. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted July 1, 1999, at Lansing. Decided August 6, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication October 22, 1999.

228 P.3d 216 The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas W. McBRIDE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06CA2524. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VII. October 1, 2009. 228 P.3d 217 COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED 228 P.3d 218 COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

228 P.3d 216 The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas W. McBRIDE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06CA2524. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VII. October 1, 2009.228 P.3d 217 COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED<

937 F.2d 1201 7 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 500, 19 Media L. Rep. 1500 Thomas J. TACKET, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.DELCO REMY DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-3496. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Nov. 1, 1990.Decided July 22, 1991.Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1991.

318 S.E.2d 382 (1984) John DOE v. Charles Randolph THOMAS. Record No. 811910. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 15, 1984. *383 William F. Stone, Jr., Martinsville (Stone & Worthy, Martinsville, on briefs), for appellant. John D. Epperly, Martinsville (Broaddus, Epperly, Broaddus & Hankins, Martinsville, on brief), fo

HAYNSWORTH, Senior Circuit Judge: Invoking the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, the members of the Shiloh True Light Church of Christ, a separatist religious sect, and associated employers of their children claimed an exemption from the child labor laws in connection with the employment of children as young as nine and ten years old in a church devised apprentice training program. The question arose in a proceedi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 43277 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Boise, January 2016 Term Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) 2016 Opinion No. 40 v.

Judge LANSING, Specially Concurring. I join in all parts of the foregoing opinion, but as to Section 11(B)(1) I write separately to address the viability of statutory implied consent to satisfy constitutional protections against warrantless searches. I join in Section 11(b)(1) because it adheres to precedents of the Idaho Supreme Court, including State v. Wulff, 157 Idaho 416, 337 P.3d 575 (2014). In

COMBS, J., with whom KAUGER, J., joins, concurring in result. {1 I concur in the majority opinion that the plaintiff in this case has standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Oklahoma Voter ID Act. I further concur in the majority opinion in that the Oklahoma Constitution does not require the Legislature to present a referendum, like SB 692, to the Governor for veto consideration prior to submitti

228 P.3d 216 (2009) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas W. McBRIDE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06CA2524. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VII. October 1, 2009. *220 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Christopher Y. Bosch, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Doug

Malone, C.J.: Following an injury accident in September 2012, Michael Schmidt was arrested on suspicion of driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI). In accordance with the Kansas Implied Consent Law, K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 8-1001, the arresting officer requested that Schmidt submit to a blood test and informed him, as required by the implied consent advisories, that failure to

Justice THOMAS, concurring. I join the opinion of the Court, which faithfully applies Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515,

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge This long-running dispute between Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Paleteria La *27 Michoacana, Inc, and Paleteria La Michoa-cana (Sub), Inc. (collectively;, and together with their predecessors