Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Thomas Richard Mullaney”
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Mullaneypublic domain
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We must determine in this case the appropriate sanction for each of three lawyers who, in accepting customers of Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C., as clients, committed professional misconduct, including aiding the unauthorized practice of law, improperly sharing legal fees with nonlawyers, and failing to seek lawful objectives of clients by failing to assess their individual needs. Finding that these acts and
Mullaney v. City of Worcesterpublic domain
Roach, Christine M., J. This was a First Amendment case against the City of Worcester brought by a former management level municipal employee. Plaintiff Elizabeth Mullaney claimed her supervisor, former City Manager and individual Defendant Thomas R. Hoover, wrongly retaliated against her for three identified expressions of her free speech rights by instituting progressive discipline against her. Following her “reassignment of po
Richard Graham v. Thomas G. Borgenpublic domain
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Richard Graham contends that a Wisconsin Court violated the Double Jopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment by imposing consecutive sentences for felony murder and the lesser included felony of armed robbery, a question to which we cannot turn, as Graham failed to file his petition for a writ of habeas corpus within the applicable limitations pe
Graham, Richard v. Borgen, Thomas G.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-4103 RICHARD GRAHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THOMAS G. BORGEN, Respondent-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
84 So.3d 336 (2011) UNIFIRST CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, TAX COLLECTOR'S OFFICE, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellee. No. 1D09-0820. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 30, 2011. Rehearing Denied March 25, 2012. Kevin S. Sanders, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Richard A. Mullaney, General Cou
Unifirst Corp. v. City of Jacksonvillepublic domain
ON MOTION FOR REVIEW OF AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS BENTON, C.J. Appellant’s motion for review of award of attorney’s fees and costs is granted in part. The circuit court shall reduce the award against Kevin S. Sanders by any amount attributable to any litigation other than the proceedings in this court that eventuated in the denial of the motion for rehearing (filed on December 15, 2009) by order
UNIFIRST CORP. v. City of Jacksonvillepublic domain
42 So.3d 247 (2009) UNIFIRST CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Tax Collector's Office, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellee. No. 1D09-0820. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 1, 2009. Opinion Denying Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc or Clarification March 25, 2010. Kevin S. Sanders, Jacksonville, for Appell
United States v. Thomas Colemanpublic domain
RILEY, Chief Judge, BEAM and BYE, Circuit Judges. RILEY, Chief Judge. Thomas Coleman conditionally pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Coleman reserved the right to appeal the district court’s 1 denial of his motions to suppress evidenc
Bernheimer v. City of Jacksonvillepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Pollock v. Fla. Dep’t of Highway Patrol, 882 So.2d 928 (Fla.2004). VAN NORTWICK, HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.
State of Iowa v. Isaiah Richard Sweetpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–0455 Filed May 27, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. ISAIAH RICHARD SWEET, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Delaware County, Michael J. Shubatt, Judge. A juvenile offender convicted of first-degree murder appeals from the district court’s order sentencing him to life in prison without the possibility of parole. DISTRICT COURT SE
Marolda v. Symantec Corp.public domain
672 F.Supp.2d 992 (2009) Diane MAROLDA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SYMANTEC CORP., Defendant. No. C 08-05701 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 28, 2009. *994 Evan Jason Smith, Brodsky & Smith LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, Larry Daniel Drury, Larry D. Drury, Ltd., Chi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–0455 Filed May 27, 2016 Amended August 5, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. ISAIAH RICHARD SWEET, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Delaware County, Michael J. Shubatt, Judge. A juvenile offender convicted of first-degree murder appeals from the district court’s order sentencing him to life in prison wit
Hunte v. Blumenthalpublic domain
PETERS, C. J. The sole issue in this appeal is whether, pursuantto General Statutes §§ 4-165 and 5-141d,1 foster *148parents qualify as “employees” of the state and are, therefore, eligible for defense and indemnification in a wrongful death action brought by the estate of a foster child. The plaintiffs, Alan and Dawne Hunte, brought an action a
William H. Nolan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Richard B. Meyerpublic domain
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Nolan appeals from an order which granted a Rule 12(b)(1) motion, Fed.R.Civ.P., dismissing his class action complaint against the defendants as administrators and trustees of the Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Profit Sharing Plan for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. Nolan, a fo
Mullaney v. Statepublic domain
5 Md. App. 248 (1968) 246 A.2d 291 THEODORE SHERMAN MULLANEY, JR., v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 379, September Term, 1967. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided October 9, 1968. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ANDERSON, MORTON, ORTH, and THOMPSON, JJ. Robert Eugene Smith for appellant. Fred Oken, Ass
Nessia v. Nessiapublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Wilmer J. Patlow, J. In each of the three above-captioned matters the court has been presented with a request for an order ratifying and confirming a change in custody arranged and consented to by both parties. In Nessia v Nessia the plaintiff father applied to this court at an Ex Parte Term for modification of the custody provisions embodied in the parties’ divorc
Adler v. Duval County School Boardpublic domain
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: On March 15, 2000, this Court ruled that Duval County’s facially-neutral policy permitting high school seniors to vote upon the delivery by a student of a message entirely of that student’s choosing as part of graduation ceremonies did not violate the Establishment Clause. Adler v. Duval County Sch. Bd., 206 F.3d 1070 (11th Cir.) (en banc), pet. for cert. granted and judgment vacated, </
In re Lehman Bros.public domain
POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART TRUSTEE’S AMENDED OBJECTION TO THE GENERAL CREDITOR PROOFS OF CLAIM FILED BY CERTAIN FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. Shelley C. Chapman, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS PROCEDURAL HISTORY.. .51 LEGAL STANDARD... 53 FINDINGS OF FACT.. .53
Dwyer v. McTyguepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Loren N. Brown, J. The complaint in this action seeks a declaratory judgment setting forth the requirements upon which the City of Sara-toga Springs must accept for dedication a roadway known as Pinehurst Drive in the City of Saratoga Springs. By notice of motion, dated June 19, 1987, and supporting papers, the plaintiff moves for an order striking the defendants’ answ
Adler v. Duval County School Boardpublic domain
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: At issue today is whether the Duval County, Florida school system’s policy of permitting graduating students to vote on whether to select a student to deliver a message wholly of her own choosing at the beginning or closing of a high school graduation ceremony violates the Establishment Clause. Because the Duval County policy unambiguously recognizes the “crucial difference between government