Cases

Pursuant to § 185 of the Practice Book, the plaintiff noticed the taking of the deposition in Manchester of three named persons, presumably witnesses in this matter. Section 185 is entitled "Deposition of Parties." The defendant has objected to the deposition as noticed and pursuant to the provisions of § 186 of the Practice Book asks for an order of protection of this court. In argument it was contended that those whose deposition was sought were not parties within the provisions o

872 A.2d 234 (2005) Robert KIGHTLINGER, Appellant v. BRADFORD TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD and David Moonan and Terry Reiley. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs February 3, 2005. Decided April 4, 2005. *235 Richard W. Mutzabaugh, Bradford, for appellant. Daniel J. Hartle, Bradford, for appellee, Bradf

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ANTHONY HILL, Appellant, v. JEFFREY REILLY, SHAIN LOTT, CLYDE HARGROVE, TINA VITOLO, MAJOR HARRIS, JASON WILLIAMS, AND E.C. WILLIAMS,

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ANTHONY HILL, No. 08-09-00208-CV § Appellant, Appeal f

Knowlton, J. If the defendant Bevington, while in possession of the plaintiff’s real estate under the lease and the agreement, having income from the property with which to pay the interest on the mortgage to the Andover Savings Bank, had neglected to pay the interest, and permitted the property to be sold under the mortgage and had bought it, it is very clear that a court of equity, on the application of the plaintiff, would have

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA90 Court of Appeals No. 16CA0448 Arapahoe County District Court No. 13CV30674 Honorable Kurt A. Horton, Judge Shawn Sovde, a minor, by and through his mother and next friend, Katrina Kinney, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kevin Scott, D.O.; and Andrew Sarka, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED Division II Opinion by JUDGE BERNAR

JUDGE COFER delivered the opinion of.the court. The appellee, a judgment creditor of John Murphy, brought this suit against Murphy and his wife, attacking a conveyance made by a third person to Mrs. Murphy as fraudulent. Mrs. Khral held a mortgage on the land, executed by Murphy and wife, to secure a debt due from them to the mortgagee, and being made a party, filed an answer, which she made a cross-petition

100 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 110 (1986) 514 A.2d 273 Bobbie Sue Burkey, a minor, by her Parents and Natural Guardians Katherine Burkey and Raymond Burkey, and Katherine Burkey and Raymond Burkey, in their own right, Appellants v. Borough of Auburn, Appellee. No. 1802 C.D. 1985. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 13, 1986. August

ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. Five pre-trial motions are pending and are addressed in this order. FACTS Rio Luciano and Debby Sala are the parents of a 14-year old child, “J.S.,” who has been diagnosed with severe disabilities including communication disabilities, mobility impairment, developmental delays, epilepsy and other developmental, physical a

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #007 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of January, 2017, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2016-B -1441 IN RE: FRANCIS C. BROUSSARD Judge James T. Genovese, assigned as Justice ad hoc, sitting for Knoll, J. for oral argument. He now sits as an elected Justice

207 Cal.App.3d 1168 (1989) 255 Cal. Rptr. 329 CECILIA BUENAVISTA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket Nos. A039468, A039770. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. February 9, 1989. *1170 COUNSEL Cal

191 Wis.2d 680 (1995) 530 N.W.2d 34 IN the INTEREST OF CHRISTOPHER D., a child under the age of 18: RHONDA R.D., Petitioner-Respondent, v. FRANKLIN R.D., Respondent-Appellant.[†] No. 94-3029. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs February 8, 1995. Decided February 20, 1995.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District SUZANNE STEINBACH, ) ) WD85697 Appellant, ) v. ) OPINION FILED: ) MAXION WHEELS, SEDALIA, ) April 18, 2023 LLC, HAYES LEMMERZ ) INTERNATIONAL, ) )

731 N.E.2d 410 (2000) 314 Ill. App.3d 527 246 Ill.Dec. 882 HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, guardian of the estate of John Peter Sartori, a minor, and Nancy and Mark Sartori, individually and as parents of John Peter Sartori, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Marilyn ABRAHAM-ZWIRN, D.O., and Kimberly Carmignani, R.N., individually and as agents, servants and employees of Loyola University of Chicago, an Ill

Thomas L. Perkins, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on cross motions for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by the Plaintiff, First Midwest Bank, and the Defendant, Jeana K. Reinbold, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the estate of I80 Equipment, LLC. The cross motions are addressed to both Count I of the complaint seeking declaratory relief and to the related amended counterclaim asserted by the Trustee.

77 Wn.2d 888 (1970) 468 P.2d 440 RITA SCOTT, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES et al., Appellants.[*] No. 40859. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. April 23, 1970. *889 The Attorney General, Michael E. Donohue and Thomas R. Chapman, Assistants, Reiley & A

THIRD DIVISION June 7, 2000 No. 1-99-1176 HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, guardian ) Appeal from the of the estate of JOHN PETER SARTORI, ) Circuit Court of a minor, and NANCY and MARK SARTORI, ) Cook County. individually and as parents of

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 21-3023 & 22-1012 _____________ CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; PENNSYLVAN

366 S.W.3d 456 (2012) GAINES GENTRY THOROUGHBREDS/FAYETTE FARMS, Appellant, v. Adan MANDUJANO; Honorable Edward Hays, Administrative Law Judge; and Workers' Compensation Board, Appellees. No. 2011-SC-000298-WC. Supreme Court of Kentucky. May 24, 2012. *458 James Gordon Fogle, Ferreri & Fogle, PLLC, Louisville, KY, Counsel for

MEMORANDUM DECISION POWELL, Chief Judge. The parties have stipulated that this cause be submitted to the court without argument on cross motions for summary judgment. The facts are set forth in the pleadings and are not disputed. The facts are as follows: The United States of America let a contract for the construction of certain facilities of the Reclamation Bureau. The contract was t