Cases

51 F.3d 285 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Tho

13 F.3d 404 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Tho

OPINION Terry Jennings, Justice Appellants, Terry Neff and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund, derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant, Weather-ford International, Ltd., a Swiss Corporation (‘Weatherford”), challenge the trial court’s orders dismissing them claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, and corporate waste against appellees, Nicholas F. Brady, David J. Butters, William E. Mac

Peters, J.P. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits. Petitioner, a firefighter, applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits, alleging that he was permanently disabled due to t

O’Donnell, J. I. Introduction {¶ 1} The state appeals from a decision of the Ashtabula County Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the state’s case against Daniel Brady, which consisted of 50 counts of pandering obscenity and sexually oriented material involving a minor. {¶2} Two issues are presented on this appeal: whether a trial court may consider evidence beyond

729 N.W.2d 792 (2007) 2007 WI App 33 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Thomas William BRADY, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 2006AP1339-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on Briefs December 18, 2006. Opinion Filed January 17, 2007. *793 On behalf of the defendan

(2008) Sandra BRADY, Plaintiff, v. Deborah DAMMER, Deborah Dominski, Matthew Guinane, Ann Fiorello, William Myers, Marilyn Kaltenborn, Michael Parada, Carla Adsit-Vassari, Robin Gray, Thomas Heinz, and Andrew Eristoff, Defendants. No. 04-CV-1126 (LEK/DRH). United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 13, 2008. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

White, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Warren County (Austin, J.), entered February 17, 1994, which, inter alia, granted respondent’s cross application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for custody of Jesse Brady. The principal issue on this appeal is whether Family Court’s award of custody of the parties’ daughter, born in 1987, to respondent should be sustained. In

525 F.Supp.2d 1034 (2007) Sandra Lee BRADY, Plaintiff, v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. No. 05 C 5934. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 25, 2007. *1035 John Thomas Moran, The Moran Law Group, Gabriel Benjamin Galloway, John T. Moran & Associates, Thomas Howard Geo

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Howe, J. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Cohen, J. The city council of Gloucester (council), acting as a special permit granting authority under G. L. c. 40A, § 17, denied the plaintiffs a special permit for the construction of a stone patio on property owned by the plaintiffs as tenants in common with more than twenty other individuals. A judge of *692the Superior Court upheld the council’s decision, ruling that i

724 N.E.2d 949 (1999) 311 Ill. App.3d 542 244 Ill.Dec. 61 Veronica BRADY, as Adm'r of the Estate of Paul B. Brady, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas McNAMARA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-98-0801. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. December 22, 1999. Rehearing Denied March 6, 2000.

2015 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP500 COMPLETE TITLE: Melissa Anderson and Kenneth Anderson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas Aul, Defendant-Respondent, Aul Real Estate Investment Company, LLC, Cornerstone

838 F.Supp. 820 (1993) William GRUBY, George Hoffar, Andrew Alagna, Anthony Tafarella, Michael Salinari, Richard Gurleski, James Quinn and Joseph Calderone, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. James BRADY, Joseph Cincotta, John Conlon, Mark Compton, William Conlon, John Fitzgerald, Anthony Paretti, Anthony Rotoli, Richard D'Amico, Edward Hansen, Eugene Burke, Anthony Cognata, William Pike and John Does Nos.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. The parties in this case own interfering patents that teach a slotted header that prevents dry wall from cracking during earthquakes by permitting the wallboard to move up and down. Plaintiff-Appellant Slip Track Systems, Inc. (“Slip Track”) owns U.S. Patent No. 5,127,760 (“the '760 patent”) and Defendant-Cross-Appellant Metal-Lite Inc. (“Metal-Lite”) own

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. Appellants Slip Track Systems, Inc., and Todd A. Brady (collectively “Slip Track”) brought an action against appellees Metal Lite, Inc., Thomas R. Herren, and Gene N. Carpenter (collectively “Metal Lite”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The district court entered an order staying the action pending the outcome

—Spain, J. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Relihan, Jr., J.), entered April 8, 1999 in Tioga County, which, inter alia, granted motions by defendants Dunlop Tire Corporation and Bridgestone/Firestone for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them and partially granted a motion by defendant Armstrong Rim and Wheel Manufacturing Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.</

5 N.Y.3d 877 (2005) In the Matter of KEVIN PATRICK BRADY, Appellant, v. THOMAS M. VAN STRYDONCK, as Administrative Judge of the Seventh District, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of KEVIN PATRICK BRADY, Appellant, v. STEPHEN R. SIRKIN, as Acting Supreme Court Justice, et al., Respondents. IN THE MATTER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ELIOT SPITZER, Respondent, v. KEVIN PATRICK BRADY, Appellant. <

THAYER, J. The plaintiff, Thomas Brady, as trustee of D.T.B., 172 Glenwood Avenue, Manchester, N.H. Real Estate Trust, appeals the Superior Court’s (Sullivan, J.) order denying his petition in equity for declaratory relief, a petition upon which the Superior Court (Groff, J.) had previously issued a decree pro confesso. We affirm. *69

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm.