Cases

765 F.Supp.2d 158 (2011) Thomas HOY and Elke Hoy, Plaintiffs, v. The INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF BAYVILLE, et al., Defendants. No. 10-CV-0094 (JFB)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 25, 2011. *160 Andrew J. Campanelli, Campanelli & Associates, P.C., Garden City, NY, for Plaintiffs. Michael L. Cirr

113 F.Supp.2d 405 (2000) Michael QUARTARARO, Plaintiff, v. Patrick HOY, Area Supervisor; Philip Deluca, and John Callender, Senior Parole Officers; Thomas A. Coughlin, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services; James F. Recore, Director of Temporary Release Programs; Brian Fischer, Superintendent of Queensboro Correctional Facility; William Lester, Senior Counselor and Temporary Release Chairman; Rudolph F. Jeffries,

633 S.E.2d 831 (2006) HICKORY ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER, P.A., Orthopaedic Center Associates, P.E. Brown, H. Grey Winfield, III, William M. Pekman, Mark R. McGinnis, Peter T, Hurley, and Jeffrey A. Knapp, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. C. Michael NICKS, Defendant-Appellee. No. COA05-386. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 5, 2006. Patrick, Harper & Dixon LLP, by

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Brian Hoyland awoke one evening to the sights and sounds of police officers standing with guns drawn in front of his home. He saw his wife, a handicapped woman, standing in the driveway with her arms raised in the air. He then heard someone yell “shoot” or “shooting.” Hoyland quickly turned on the porch light, opened the front door, stood in his doorway, and screamed at the officers, who stood 30-40

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge. Named Plaintiffs, Hoi Ming Michael Ho and Joseph Sciarro (“Lead Plaintiffs”), Initial plaintiff Mingli Li, and Plaintiff Huaying Jin, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, commenced this class action for violations of Sections 11 & 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 10(b) & 20(a) of the Secur

-. JOANNA STATON District Clerk BELL COUNTY, TEXAS BELL COUNTY JUSTICE COMPLEX 1201 Huey Road • P. 0. Box 909 • Belton, Texas 76513 (254) 933-5197 • Fax (254) 933-5199 Joanna

ACCEPTED 14-15-00024-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/6/2015 5:12:55 PM

519 F.Supp.2d 844 (2007) Cindy LANDEEN, Petitioner/Counterclaim Defendant, v. PHONEBILLIT, INC. and Mirror Media Company, Respondents/Counterclaim Defendants. Steven V. Sann, Respondent/Intervenor/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Neil Lucas, Respondent/Intervenor/Counterclaim Defendant. No. 1:04-cv-1815-LJM-WTL. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. <

SAUNDERS, Juáge. |! This litigation arises from a property owner petitioning the court for a right of passage to its eneloseá estate. Motions for summary juágments were granteá removing several áefenáant lanáowners from the suit baseá on a fináing that their laná woulá not be subject to the eventual choice of route the court woulá make. After a two áay trial aná post trial mem-oranáa were fileá on the iss

256 F.3d 895 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,v.MICHAEL JOHNSON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. No. 99-30012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted December 18, 2000Filed July 20, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Michael Filipovic, Assistant F

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiffs U.S. Futures Exchange, LLC ("USFE") and U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc. ("UEH") bring this antitrust case against defendants Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. ("CBOT") and Chicago *1237Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("CME").1 Plaintiffs allege

ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. ¶ 1. Steven Thomas, by his guardian ad litem, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision1 that declined to extend the risk-contribution theory announced in Collins v. Eli Lilly Co., 116 Wis. 2d 166, 342 N.W.2d 37 (1984), to the defendant-respondent lead pigment manufacturers, American Cyanamid Co., Atlantic Richfield Co., ConA-gra Grocery Products Co., E.I.

MEMORANDUM ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS* MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge Plaintiffs move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 67(b) for this court to distribute $1,000,000 deposited in the court’s registry in satisfaction of the undisputed portion of the Judgment by Interye-nor Interlocal Risk Financing Fund of North Carolina (“iRFFNC”), the municipal ri

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether the term •‘prior sentence,” United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual'§ 4Al.l(a) (Nov. 2015), *1357 includes a state sentence imposed after a defendant’s initial federal sentence but before the district court vacated that sentence and resenten

Jensen, Justice. [¶1] The North Dakota State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors ("Board") appeals from district court judgments affirming in part, reversing in part, and remanding to the Board its disciplinary decisions against Michael Berg, Apex Engineering Group, Inc., Scott Olson, Dain Miller, Thomas Welle, and Timothy Paustian. We conclude a prepon

581 S.E.2d 415 (2003) 357 N.C. 170 Mary WILLIAMS, Plaintiff v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant v. Orange County, Orange County Board of Commissioners, and Orange County Human Relations Commission, Counterclaim Defendants. No. 277PA01. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 13, 2003. *41

9 A.3d 1134 (2010) David H. CAIARELLI, James Abruzzese, Henry Astemborski, Joseph Bozynski, Michael Ciorra, Kenneth W. Collier, Joseph DeCaria, Henry T. Grubbs, Joseph R. Jackson, Robert Lang, John M. Lerch, Marvin Littlejohn, Michael Marletti, James J. Nese, John Obranovich, Donald Petrus, Daniel J. Taylor, Jack Tinelli, Mark Tomes, Robert Woodside, Fred Young, Petitioners v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Alan J. Lacy and Lyle G. Heidemann, Responde

Opinion by JUDGE TAUBMAN T1 This appeal is one of several brought by Charles B. Bruce, Jr. (husband) arising out of the dissolution of his marriage to Regina T. Drexler (wife) The present dispute raises the issue whether an obligor spouse's retirement funds in a plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (2010), are exempt from assignment under a qualified domestic relations o

CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The seven named Petitioners bring this Habeas Corpus Petition and Class Action Complaint on behalf of themselves and a putative class of Vietnamese citizens who immigrated to the United States before *9871995. (Dkt. 27 [First Amended Habeas Corpus P