Cases

Filed 6/27/22 (see concurring opinion) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GARRETT THEROLF, F083561 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. MJP018758) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MADERA

Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. *1001 With the help of court-appointed counsel, a criminal defendant facing misdemeanor charges filed a successful motion *60 to suppress the prosecution'

Filed 9/3/19 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, F078697 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 512128) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS

Filed 8/5/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, F078697 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 512128) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS OPINION COUNTY,

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J. *133Labor Code section 226.2,1 which became effective January 1, 2016, addresses the manner in which piece-rate employees are to be compensated for rest and recovery periods and other *134nonproductive t

Filed 11/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- JOHN TOS et al., C089466 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2016-

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES MILLS, No. 17-56343 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cv-07127- DOC-RAO CITY OF COVINA, a California municipal corporation; KIM RANEY, in his official capacity as the Chief OPINION of the City of Covina Police Depar

101 Cal.Rptr.2d 718 (2000) 24 Cal.4th 627 12 P.3d 1125 Alan O. AAS et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County, Respondent; William Lyon Company et al., Real Parties in Interest. Provencal Community Association, Petitioner, v. The Superior Court of San Diego County, Respondent; William Lyon Company et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. S07

J-A28024-23 2024 PA Super 216 KAREN M. CONSTANTINE, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF : PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS A. CONSTANTINE, : DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY AS : WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT : : Appellant : : : N

Filed 5/3/16 (unmodified opinion attached) (review denied 8/22/16; reposted to include Supreme Court statements upon denial of review) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO BEATRIZ VERGARA, a Minor, etc., B258589 et al.,

Opinion BOREN, P. J. — In this lawsuit, nine students who were attending California public schools sued the State of California and several state officials, seeking a court order declaring various provisions of the Education Code unconstitutional. According to plaintiffs, these provisions, which govern how kindergarten through grade 12 public school teachers o

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUSTIN HEATH THOMAS, Defendant and Appellant. S161781 Riverside County Superior Court RIF086792 January 26, 2023 Justice Cantil-Sakauye* authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Gu

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 382–418 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 15, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 834 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 835 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

Cuéllar, J. The Legislature directed the Insurance Commissioner to "promulgate reasonable rules and regulations ... as are necessary to administer" the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. (Ins. Code, § 790.10.) The question before us is whether that statutory authority supports the Insurance Commissioner's 2011 regulation covering replacement cost estimates for homeowners insurance (Cal.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1153 IN RE: BRIAN W. COUGHLIN, Debtor. BRIAN W. COUGHLIN, Appellant, v. LAC DU FLAMBEAU BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS; L.D.F. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORP.; L.D.F. HOLDINGS, LLC; NIIWIN, LLC, d/b/a Lendgreen,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Third party plaintiff Bobby Mills has sued the District of Columbia Government (“the District”), seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for the alleged taking of certain real property in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Mills seek

59 Cal.App.4th 1183 (1997) LAWRENCE A. TRUITT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. B113848. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. December 8, 1997. *1185 COUNSEL Fogel, Feldman, Ost

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20–1814 JOHN K. MACIVER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY, INC., et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TONY EVERS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, Defendant-Appellee.