Cases

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Kathy Heisler filed an employment discrimination case under the Americans With Disabilities Act, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, see Minn.Stat. Ann. §§ 363.01-363.20 (West 1991 & Supp.2002), alleging that her employer, the Metropolitan Council failed to accommodate her dis

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA58 Court of Appeals No. 16CA0104 Douglas County District Court No. 14CR754 Honorable Paul A. King, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Thomas Heisler, Defendant-Appellant. JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED Division V Opinion by CHIEF JUDGE LOEB Rothenberg* and Casebolt*, JJ.,

116 Wis.2d 657 (1983) STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bernard A. HEISLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 83-570-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs August 15, 1983. Decided November 8, 1983. *658 For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Glenn L. Cushing, assistan

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Harrison, acting in its capacity as the Board of Police Commissioners for the Town of Harrison, dated January 22, 2009, which, after a hearing, terminated the petitioner’s employment. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The opinion of the court was delivered by OSTRER, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned). The principal issue in this appeal from a conviction after a trial de novo in the Law Division requires us to construe two provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-19, the notice and demand statute in the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-1 to N.J.S.A. 2C:36A-1.1 First, the

Matter of DiFlorio v Heisler 2026 NY Slip Op 02566 April 24, 2026 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. IN THE MATTER OF DANA DIFLORIO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v JOHN HEISLER, III, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. </

CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Shirley Heisler appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Jeep Corporation — UAW Retirement Income Plan (Retirement Plan). Heisler argues that the Retirement Plan, inasmuch as it denied her application for survivor benefits, violates § 205(a) of

Cardona, P. J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered July 17, 1996 in Albany County, which partially granted petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 619, to direct a new special meeting of shareholders of Roemer and Featherstonhaugh, P. C. and to allow petitioners to exercise their voting rights. On March 6, 1996, a special meeting of the sharehol

RICHARDSON, P. J. Contemnor, who is the keeper of the records of the Portland Police Bureau’s Internal Investigation Division (IID), was held in contempt for refusing to turn over certain IID records to Carter, the defendant in a pending criminal case. We affirm. Carter was arrested by Portland Police Officer Berry on June 11,1988, for riot and disorderly conduct. On August 2, 1988, while a television broadcast

101 Cal.App.3d 434 (1980) 161 Cal. Rptr. 651 Estate of CHARLOTTE B. CAHOON, Deceased. EDSON G. THOMAS, as Executor, etc., et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. HOWARD L. VAN DYCK, Objector and Appellant. Conservatorship of the Estate of ADDA B. BLOMQUIST. WELLS FARGO BANK, as Conservator, etc., et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. HOWARD L. VAN DYCK, Objector and Appellant. Estate of ANDREW B.

*302 Opinion GRUENDEL, J. The plaintiffs, Luis Carrillo and Sandra Carrillo, appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding them damages and interest for the failure of the defendants, Keith Goldberg and Leigh Ann Goldberg, to return their security deposit upon the termination of their lease in violation of General Statutes § 47 a-21 (d

380 N.W.2d 329 (1986) George W. JURGENS and Margaret M. Jurgens, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Ronald HEISLER and Elaine Heisler, Defendants and Appellants. Civ. No. 10988. Supreme Court of North Dakota. January 7, 1986. Traynor, Rutten & Traynor, Devils Lake, for plaintiffs and appellees; argued by Thomas E. Rutten. Foughty, Christianson & White Eagle

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. MILLETT, Circuit Judge: Invoking the protections of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., Linda Solomon sought substantial flexibility in her working hours — what is known as a “maxiflex” schedule — as an accommodation for her disability. She alleges that she infor

439 So.2d 4 (1983) Carol S. HINES, et al. v. Charles C. HEISLER, et al. 81-867. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 15, 1983. Rehearing Denied September 30, 1983. *5 John Earle Chason of Chason & Chason, Bay Minette, for appellants. J. Don Foster and Thack H. Dyson of Foster, Brackin & Bolton, Foley, Ch

113 Mich. App. 630 (1982) 318 N.W.2d 503 HEISLER v. ROGERS Docket No. 54480. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided January 26, 1982. Bishop & Shelton, P.C. (by Thomas H. Blaske), for plaintiffs. Kitch, Suhrheinrich, Smith, Saurbier & Drutchas, P.C., for defendant. Before: D.C. RILEY, P.J., and R.M. MAHE

926 A.2d 728 (2007) 2007 ME 81 NORTH SEBAGO SHORES, LLC et al. v. Barry T. MAZZAGLIA, Trustee of the Mazzaglia Family Trust. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: April 11, 2007. Decided: July 5, 2007. *729 Chris Neagle (orally), Thomas E. Getchell, Troubh Heisler, Portland, for plaintiffs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. St. Helena Hospital (“St. Helena”) appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) in In re St. Helena Hosp., Serial No. 85/416,343, 2013 WL 5407267 (T.T.A.B., June 25, 2013). The Board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of St. Helena’s application to register “TAKETEN,” under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d) (2012), as

260 U.S. 245 (1922) HEISLER v. THOMAS COLLIERY COMPANY ET AL. No. 541. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 14, 15, 1922. Decided November 27, 1922. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. *246 Mr. Louis Marshall for plaintiff in error. Mr. George E. Alter, Attorne

990 A.2d 1028 (2010) 2010 ME 24 Edward DAMON v. S.D. WARREN CO. et al. Docket: WCB-09-17 and WCB-09-157. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: November 9, 2009. Decided: March 23, 2010. *1029 Thomas E. Getchell, Esq. (orally), Troubh Heisler, Portland, ME, for S.D. Warren Company and CC

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL TO DEFENDANTS (Document No. 97) NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Presently before the court is Defendants’ counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw. Defendants are Cornelius Phillips, III, and his professional law corporation Dunn & Phillips