Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Thomas Hanney”
Hanney v. Statepublic domain
OPINION This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery by assault where the punishment was assessed by the court at 15 years following a verdict of guilty. The appellant was tried jointly with one Frank Edward Timmons. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Suffice it to say the record reflects that Winnie Risner, night clerk of the Valhalla Motel in the city of Dallas, was robbed by three men near midnight on April 20, 1969, of approximatel
775 F.2d 24 54 USLW 2232, 6 Employee Benefits Ca 2307 LONG ISLAND OIL PRODUCTS CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.LOCAL 553 PENSION FUND and Bernard Pellegrino, Joseph Rudin,William Kenny, Robert Greenes and Thomas Hanney,as Trustees of the Local 553 PensionFund, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1226, Docket 85-7008. United States Court of Appeals,Second
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: The question on this appeal is whether Congress violates due process when it first enacts a law having retroactive application and then — after having second-thoughts— rescinds it. This case, one of the many disputes engendered by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (MPPAA or Act), pits a multiemployer pension benefit fund against an employer that has withdrawn from the fund. When
Hanney v. Maxwellpublic domain
Howe, J. The plaintiff alleged that she was separate in property from her husband by judgment of a competent court, and entitled to the possession of certain paraphernal property, and especially of certain furniture, which had been decreed by the judgment to belong to *50her separate estate. This judgment was rendered December 29, I860; and duly published, and decreed the h
Hill v. William A. Hanney & Co.public domain
Land, J. The purpose of this suit is to determine the adverse claims of the plaintiff and the defendants, W. A. Hanney & Co., to the proceeds of a draft in the hands of W. L. Allen & Co. The facts of the case are these : H. H. Beck a resident of the State of Texas, and a member of the firm of J. Cherry & Co. domiciled out of this State, placed
Richards v. Board of Electionspublic domain
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Donovan J. Richards, Jr., as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 2008, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the *431public office of Member of the Assembly, 31st Assembly District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens Co
State v. Gorepublic domain
Opinion LAVINE, J. The defendant, Curtis Gore, was charged with assault of an employee of the department of correction in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167c (a) (1). *760The defendant pleaded not guilty and elected to be tried by the court. Following a trial, the court found him guilty of assault of an employee of the department of cor
State v. Gorepublic domain
955 A.2d 1 (2008) 288 Conn. 770 STATE of Connecticut v. Curtis GORE. No. 17769. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued April 24, 2008. Decided September 23, 2008. *3 Melissa L. Streeto, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Michael L. Regan, state's attorney, Thomas Griff
State v. Schaefferpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Schaeffer, 2015-Ohio-3531.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 13-14-34 v. CHARLES V. SCHAEFFER, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Seneca County Common Pleas Court Trial
In Re Sanderspublic domain
28 B.R. 917 (1983) In re Thomas Graham SANDERS, II, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 81-10342. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. April 8, 1983. *918 David C. Adams, and Martin E. Updegraff, Wichita, Kan., for United American Bank and John Greenstreet, respectively. Donald B. Clark, Wichita, Kan., for debtor. MEMORAN
Commonwealth v. Fultonpublic domain
830 A.2d 567 (2003) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Curtis FULTON, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted August 31, 2001. Decided August 19, 2003. *568 Ronald Greenblatt, for Curtis Fulton, Appellant. Hugh J. Burns, Philadelphia, for the Com. of Pa, Appellee. Before: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE
Seasons Realty Corp. v. City of Yonkerspublic domain
George Beisheim, Jr., J. The plaintiff landlords have instituted this action against .the City of Yonkers for a declaratory judgment that the Declaration of Housing Emergency passed by the City Council of the City of Yonkers on June 28, 1974, is invalid, illegal and unconstitutional. The city takes the position that its resolution of June 28, 1974, was a valid exercise of the power delegated to it under the Emergency Tenant Prote
In Re Faber's, Inc.public domain
360 F.Supp. 946 (1973) In the Matter of FABER'S, INC. No. H-10857. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 16, 1973. *947 Eugene Berman, Springfield, Mass., for petitioner. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PETITION FOR REVIEW BLUMENFELD, District Judge. Faber's, Inc., is a bankrupt retail carpet dealer w
Burleson v. Rawlinspublic domain
This is an original application by Mrs. Wallace Anthony Burleson, joined pro forma by her husband M. M. Burleson, against Honorable John A. Rawlins, Judge of the 116th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, seeking permission, without payment of cost or giving security therefor, to prosecute a cause of action for damages in a suit originally filed in the 101st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, by Wallace Anthony, a feme sole (since married to M. M. Burleson), against B. P. Blasinga
Worobey v. Sibiethpublic domain
In this action the plaintiff sought to secure a reconveyance of property which she had conveyed to the defendants, claiming that they had agreed with her that they were to pay certain overdue taxes and that when the plaintiff was able to reimburse them for the money so spent and for any sums they might pay upon a mortgage upon the premises they would convey the property back to her. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed. The determinative i
Mullen v. E. D. Green Realty Co.public domain
E.D. Green Realty Company, Inc., was the owner of four mortgage notes, signed and executed by Mary Waterman Evans, three of which were in the sum of $300 each, and one note for $475. On the 5th day of August, 1929, it pledged the above notes to the Texas Lumber Company, Inc., as security for its note in the sum of $772.71 held by said Texas Lumber Company, Inc. On September 19, 1931, by notarial act, E.D. Green Realty Company, Inc., transferred, set over, and assigned unto K.S. Biggers
People v. Alloccapublic domain
Jenks, P. J.: The proof justified a finding that on the evening of Sunday, September 8, 1907, Joseri was killed by a pistol shot as he was leaving the .house kept by the woman Marietta, and that he had been last with a number of persons in the dram shop in that house. But the proof did not justify any finding that defendant fired the shot or was privy to the killing. The defendant, a young man about 20 years
Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Mundaypublic domain
Mr. Justice Stone delivered the opinion of the court: On September 21, 1916, William C. Niblack, as receiver of the LaSalle Street Trust and Savings Bank, filed a bill against appellees, as directors of said bank, seeking to recover moneys lost by the bank through their alleged negligent acts as such directors. An amended bill was filed April 12, 1918. Demurrers were filed b
Niblack v. Mundaypublic domain
Mr. Justice O’Connor delivered the opinion of the court. By this appeal complainant seeks to reverse a decree of the superior court of Cook county sustaining demurrers to and dismissing for want of equity his amended bill of complaint. Complainant, as receiver of the La Salle Street Trust and Savings Bank, sought to recover moneys lost by the bank through the alleged neglige
Ober, Nanson & Co. v. Matthewspublic domain
Ludeling, C. J. The plaintiffs brought suit by attachment against William Matthews, on the thirteenth of February, 1867, to recover a balance of $50,000, due on account, and on the same day Garrard & Craig were cited to answer interrogatories as garnishees. On the twenty-third day of February a supplemental petition was filed, and the Southern Bank was garnisheed. On the second of March, 1867, tlie Southe