Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Thomas F. McKenna”
Thomas Lovelace v. Todd McKennapublic domain
Kanne, Circuit Judge. Thomas Lovelace alleges that correctional officers at Dixon Correctional Center severely beat him while he was transferred between housing units. Lovelace sued the officers in federal court, claiming they used excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and bringing additional state-law claims. After a four-day trial in January 2017, a jury returned a verd
Marks v. McKennapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner-Appellant Thomas Marks appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. As the facts and procedural history are familiar to the parties, we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our disposition. Petitions for habeas corpus relief such as this one are governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C.
Marks v. McKennapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner-Appellant Thomas Marks appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. As the facts and procedural history are familiar to the parties, we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our disposition. Petitions for habeas corpus relief such as this one are governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C.
Coville v. McKennapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Tony Leon Coville appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his Washington state guilty-plea conviction and sentence for first-degree rape with a deadly weapon and first-degree burglary with a deadly weapon. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. Coville challenges the district court’s determin
Zaitzeff v. McKennapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** David Zaitzeff appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his action challenging the constitutionality of a Washington state criminal statute prohibiting the sexual exploitation of minors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, see Roulette v. City of Seattle, 97 F.3d 300, 302 (9th Cir.1996), we affirm.
McKenna v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
636 F.Supp.2d 446 (2009) Michael McKENNA, William McKenna, and Raymond Carnation v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. Civil Action Nos. 98-5835, 99-1163. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 7, 2009. *450 Barbara A. Thomas, Robert M. Hammond Associates, Doylestown, PA, Brian M. Puricelli, Newtown, PA, for Michael McKenna, Wi
McKenna v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
511 F.Supp.2d 518 (2007) Michael McKENNA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al. Myrna Moore, et al. v. City of Philadelphia, et al. Civil Action Nos. 98-5835, 99-1163. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 15, 2007. *519 *520 Michael McKenna, Philadelphia, PA, Pro se. <
McKenna v. Sossopublic domain
745 A.2d 1 (1999) Kathy McKENNA, Appellee, v. Helen V. SOSSO, Ronald F. Croushore, Howard Engelberg, Herman Engelberg, PPR Realty, Inc., Real Estate Educators, Inc., Pennsylvania Preferred Mortgage Company, Inc., Preferred Settlement Services, Inc., Preferred Insurance Agency, Inc., Murray 22 Associates, Inc., and Pennsylvania Preferred Title Insurance Company. Appeal of Helen V. Sosso and Ronald F. Croushore, Appellants.
Thomas Lovelace v. Todd McKennapublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-1393 THOMAS WAYNE LOVELACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TODD MCKENNA, LES YEPSEN, and DARRIN SMITH, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo
Thomas McKenna v. David Singerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS McKENNA and ) GARRETT McKENNA, both ) individually and derivatively on behalf ) of ROBISON ENERGY FUND ) MANAGEMENT, LLC and GREEN ) ENERGY COMPANIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, ) ) v. )
McKenna v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.public domain
*420 SELYA, Circuit Judge. This interlocutory appeal requires us to explore, for the first time, the crossroads at which class-action rules intersect with the rescission provisions of the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667, and its Massachusetts counterpart, the Massachusetts Cons
Cabalce v. Thomas E. Blanchard & Associates, Inc.public domain
OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to a contract with the United States Department of the Treasury, Appellant VSE Corporation (VSE) agreed to store and destroy fireworks that had been seized by the federal government. VSE challenges the district court’s order remanding to state court several actions that sought to impose liability on VSE for a de
McKenna v. Pacific Rail Servicepublic domain
817 F.Supp. 498 (1993) Peter McKENNA, et al. v. PACIFIC RAIL SERVICE. Civ. A. No. 91-693. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 29, 1993. *499 *500 *501 *502 *503 Louie N
State v. McKennapublic domain
512 A.2d 113 (1986) STATE v. Frederick J. McKENNA. No. 85-302-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 30, 1986. Arlene Violet, Atty. Gen., Thomas Dickinson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff. William F. Reilly, Public Defender, Paula Rosin, Barbara Hurst, Asst. Public Defenders, for defendant. OPINION BEVILACQUA, Chief Justice.
Center for Food Safety v. Thomas Vilsackpublic domain
OPINION SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW This appeal represents another chapter in the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) regulation of Roundup Ready Alfalfa (“RRA”). RRA is a plant genetically “engineered” or “modified” by the Monsanto Company and Forage Genetics International to be resistant to the herbicide g
Patrick McKenna v. Javier Sotopublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN DIVISION PATRICK MCKENNA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. JAVIER SOTO, A DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY CANDIDATE FOR ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 3, ET AL., Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-20-0123-AP/EL
483 F.Supp.2d 119 (2007) GENLYTE THOMAS GROUP LLC, Plaintiff, v. ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SYSTEMS, a division of ARCH LIGHTING GROUP, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-10945-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 11, 2007. *120 John L. Capone, Thomas C. O'Konski, Kevin Gannon, Cesari and McKenna, LLP, Boston, MA, J
State v. McKennapublic domain
188 Conn. 671 (1982) STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN MCKENNA STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JACK DIMARTINO (10556) Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued October 13, 1982. Decision released December 14, 1982. SPEZIALE, C. J., HEALEY, PARSKEY, SHEA and GRILLO, Js. Thomas D. Clifford, with whom were Hubert J. Santos and, on the br
King v. McKennapublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D. d/b/a : KINGCAST/MORTGAGE MOVIES, : C.A. No: K15C-03-028 RBY : Plaintiff, : : v. : : BETTY LOU McKENNA, HOLLY : MALONE and JOHN W. PARAD
Laurel Gardens, LLC v. Timothy McKennapublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 18-3758 ______________ LAUREL GARDENS, LLC; AMERICAN WINTER SERVICES, LLC; LAUREL GARDENS HOLDINGS, LLC; LGSM, GP; CHARLES P. GAUDIOSO, Appellants v. TIMOTHY MCKENNA; MICHAEL MCKENNA; MAT SITE MANAGEMENT, LLC; BOBBY AEREN