Cases

TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge: Timothy Richardson filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), seeking to reopen the district court's final judgment dismissing his Eighth Amendment, intellectual disability claim on the merits under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

WIENER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellee, Thomas R. Edwards, sued Defendant-Appellant, Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), seeking a declaratory judgment that Continental was required to defend him, pursuant to a professional liability insurance policy, in an action brought against Edwards by Cal Dive International, Incorporated (“Cal Dive”). Edwards filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking a declaratio

27 F.3d 556 Cropper (Stanley)v.Frame (Thomas G.), McFadden (Edward), Hurbert (Mary Ellen),Butler (Doctor) NO. 93-1437 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. May 13, 1994 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. 2<

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge. In 2009, plaintiff Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (“Realtime”) sued a number of companies involved in some aspect of the financial services industry (including banks, exchanges, and information services) for infringing three of its patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,417,568 (the “'568 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,714,747 (the “'747 Patent”), and U.S.

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Robert Lowinger appeals from Judge Sweet’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The complaint asserted claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), against, inter alia, appellees Goldman Sachs & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (collectively “Lead Underwriters”). It sought to hold them liable under Section 16(b)

728 F.Supp.2d 274 (2010) Joel ROSS, Eric Levine, and Jerde Development Company, Plaintiffs, v. Stanley E. THOMAS and S. Thomas Enterprises of Sacramento, LLC, Defendants. No. 09 Civ 5631(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 15, 2010. *276 Gerald Padian, Esq., Bradley M. Rank, Esq., Howard M. Raber, Esq., Tashji

PER CURIAM: Darnell Stanley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stanley v. United States, No. 1:06-cv00216-JCC (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge. Plaintiff Realtime Data, LLC (“Real-time”) brought nine lawsuits asserting patent infringement against approximately 18 separate defendants. The defendants break down into three general groups: (i) major financial institutions including Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Corporation, Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, H

PER CURIAM: Darnell Stanley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stanley v. United States, Nos. 1:06-cv-00216-JCC; 1:06-CV-00038-UNA (filed Aug. 23, 2006 & entered Aug. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN LINEHAN and THOMAS ) MILLS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0851-BWD ) STANLEY A. MILLS, JR., PATRICK ) GOSSETT, EDWARD CHRZANOWSKI, ) FRANCIS MARKERT, TIM BENNETT, ) TONI SHARP, DONALD PRESTON, ) THE CITY OF REHOBOTH BEACH ) BOARD OF

794 F.Supp.2d 265 (2011) CAMBRIDGE PLACE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-11376-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 2, 2011. *266 T. Christopher Donnelly, Michael S. D'Orsi, Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, LLP, Boston, MA, David

580 N.W.2d 742 (1998) David M. STANLEY, Hilarius L. Heying, Cloyd Robinson, Jane A. Miller, Don Carver, Herbert A. Wilson, Edward D. Failor, Sr., Margaret Beals, Joann Fretner, John G. Giblin, Riley Gillette, Hugh S. Greig, Edwin A. Hicklin, Herbert H. Kersten, Marjorie E. Kreager, Donald P. Racheter, Donald H. Shaw, Jean Leu Stanley, Tom Vance, Keith L. Vetter, and C.H. Woodward, Appellants, v. Michael L. FITZGERALD, Treasurer of the State of Io

631 P.2d 826 (1981) 53 Or.App. 254 CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent, v. Thomas Edward STANLEY, Appellant. No. M2795; CA A20057. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 24, 1981. Decided July 27, 1981. Phillip M. Margolin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. Thomas H. Denney, Asst. At

This is an arbitration case. Edward D. Jones Co., LP, and its agent, Robert Decker, appeal from the denial of their motion to compel Tranquilino Ryan Ventura to arbitrate his claims against them. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Co. and its agent, Hunter S. Bowen, appeal separately from the same order, in which the trial court denied their motion to compel Ventura to arbitrate his claims against them. We reverse. Facts When Ventura was 14 years old, he rece

OPINION ROBB, Judge. Case Summary and Issue Randal Young, who is currently incarcerated in the Indiana Department of Correction (“DOC”), brought this suit challenging the constitutionality of the DOC’s policy concerning the restoration of credit time for inmates. The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings in f

Judgment rendered March 3, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,773-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ANDREW F. PAYNE

OPINION OF THE COURT (February 2, 2017) CABRET, Associate Justice. Eric A. Browne1 appeals the Superior Court’s May 4, 2015 judgment order directing him to remove the portion *330of his fence encroaching upon Quinton Stanley’s property. Because the Superior Court did not err in denying Browne re

Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Kerrie Milligan-Grimstad alleges that her former employer Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (“MSSB”) fired her on account of her gender and subjected her to unlawful harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiff has also sued MSSB’s parent company Morgan Stanley. Defendants have moved for

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD ANDERSON; COLEEN No. 19-17520 WORTHINGTON; JANET GORAL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00714- v. JAM-AC EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.; THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, OPINION LLLP; EDJ HOLDI

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Harold R. Stanley was convicted of evasion of payment of taxes and corruptly endeavoring to impede enforcement of Internal Revenue laws, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 7201 , 7212(a). He appeals, arguing that the district court <