Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 25, 2012 THOMAS EDWARD KOTEWA v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Anderson County Nos. B0C01004 Donald R. Elledge, Judge No. E2011-02527-CCA-R3-PC - Filed October 26, 2012 Petitioner, Thomas Edward Kotewa, appeals the post-conviction court’s denial of his petition

*435Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court. South Carolina’s Family Court enforces its child support orders by threatening with incarceration for civil contempt those who are (1) subject to a child support order, (2) able to comply with that order, but (3) fail to do so. We must decide whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause requ

596 F.3d 260 (2010) Keith Mark DILLON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brad ROGERS; T.W. Thompson; Sergeant Edwards; Sergeant Walker; Deputy Hartzglou; Lieutenant Hollifield; Thomas Pietsch, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-30419. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 4, 2010. *264 Soren E. Gisleson, Herman, Herman, Katz &a;

THOMAS, Judge. Keith Rogers was employed as a registered representative of G.L.S. & Associates, Inc., and G.L. Smith & Associates, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “GLSA”), until he resigned from his employment in January 2013. Rogers solicited and effected the sale of securities for GLSA; thus, Rogers is a securities broker.1 His employment agreement required that he be a re

*293OPINION OF THE COURT The Court of Appeals affirmed a decision in which the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) vacated the average weekly wage calculation because the record contained insufficient evidence to apply KRS 342.140(l)(e) properly. The Board then remanded the claim for further proceedings to include the taking of additional proof. Appealing, the Uninsured Employers

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of minor political parties and minor party nominees for statewide office, 1 challenged the constitutionality of Section 2911 of the Pennsylvania election code, 25 Pa. Stat. § 2911(b), as applied to minor political parties and their ca

NEALON, J., The estate of a shooting victim has filed this tort action against the shooter, his father and a Susquehanna County business that sells firearms. The adult shooter’s father has demurred to this action on the ground that he owed no duty of care to the decedent under the circumstances alleged. The shooter, his father and the gun sales business have also filed preliminaiy objections to the estate’s claim for p

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of minor political parties and minor party nominees for statewide office, 1 challenged the constitutionality of Section 2911 of the Pennsylvania election code, 25 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2911(b), as applied to minor political parties and their candidate

468 F.3d 188 Marakay J. ROGERS, Esquire, Candidate for Governor of Pennsylvania; the Green Party of Pennsylvania, c/o Paul Teese, Chair; the Constitution Party of Pennsylvania; Ken V. Krawchuk; Hagan Smith, Appellants.v.Thomas W. CORBETT, Jr., Attorney General of Pennsylvania; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, c/o Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania; Governor Edward G. Rendell; Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of Commonwealth of Pennsylvan

06/25/2024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 1, 2023 Session THOMAS EDWARD CLARDY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2006-B-1065 Jennifer Smith, Judge

MEMORANDUM * Defendants, former and current police officers of the City of Kennewick, Washington, appeal from the district court’s orders denying summary judgment on the defense of qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction to review orders under the collateral order doctrine, Watkins v. City of Oakland, 145 F.3d 1087, 1091 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factu

460 F.3d 455 Marakay J. ROGERS, Esquire, Candidate for Governor of Pennsylvania; the Green Party of Pennsylvania, c/o Paul Teese, Chair; the Constitution Party of Pennsylvania; Ken V. Krawchuk; Hagan Smith, Appellants.v.Thomas W. CORBETT, Jr., Attorney General of Pennsylvania; COmmonwealth of Pennsylvania, c/o Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania; Governor Edward G. Rendell; Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of Commonwealth of Pennsylvan

ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant Thomas County School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 69) and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 57) filed by Defendants Charles Evans, Nancy Hiers, Scott Morgan, Mark NeSmith, and Kay Streets (collectively “Defendant Board Members”).1 For the- reasons stated below, the motions are granted.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: The appellant, Thomas B. Mudd, * whose great-grandfather, Dr. Samuel Mudd, was convicted by a military tribunal for his alleged role in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, seeks judicial r

OPINION PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs Wendy Thomas and her labor union appeal the grant of summary judgment on their First Amendment retaliation claims, and defendants cross-appeal a later order denying them attorneys’ fees. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Crane v. Conoco, Inc., 41 F.3d 547, 549 (9th Cir.1994), and the de

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. Appellant Thomas L. West was convicted by a jury of possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base in violation of § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(iii) of the Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act (the “Controlled Substances Act” or the “Act”). 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) & (b)(l)(A)(iii) (West 1999

HUG, Chief Judge: Appellant Thomas Lowe pled guilty and was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. He appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for modification of his 87-month sentence, which motion he made after the Sentencing Commission amended the Sentencing Guideline under which he was sentenc

PER CURIAM: Thomas Scott Henry appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Henry argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by (1) refusing to give pr

MEMORANDUM** Edward Goldman appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss Rogers’ civil rights claims. We have interlocutory appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to consider the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. Jensen v. City of Oxnard, 145 F.3d 1078, 1082 (9th Cir.1998). Although the district court treated the motion as a reiteration of the earlier moti

PER CURIAM. Michael Edward Thomas was convicted of certain felonies in Bay County case numbers 99-2679-B and 98-1358-B and placed on probation. He was later found to have violated probation and was sentenced to terms of imprisonment in both cases. Trial counsel filed a notice of appeal which identified only case number 98-1358-B as being appealed and that has been assigned this court’s case number 1D00-3739. Thomas seeks a b