Cases

CALABRIA, Judge. *191 Lillian Cain ("respondent") appeals from an order authorizing the Substitute Trustee, *838 Goddard & Peterson, PLLC ("G & P"), to proceed with the foreclosure of

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01645-SCT TUNICA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS v. HWCC-TUNICA, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/13/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES E. WEBSTER TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ALFRED THOMAS TUCKER, III W. ELLIS PITTMAN MELVIN DAVID MILLER, II COURT FROM WHICH A

ACCEPTED 01-15-00260 FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/17/2015 8:29:47 PM

MEMORANDUM OPINION BENJAMIN COHEN, Bankruptcy Judge. The matters before the Court are: 1. The plaintiffs Complaint for non-dischargeability filed in this Court on January 7, 2006, A.P. Docket No. 1, incorporating the state court Complaint the plaintiff filed in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, Bessemer Division on December 22, 2005; and

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: In November 2014, this Court approved a settlement resolving two lawsuits in which Tronox, Incorporated and affiliated entities (collectively, “Tronox”) — all of which had filed chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) — and the United States governmen

MEMORANDUM Bartle, District Judge. Plaintiff are Frank Noonan (“Noonan”), Rahdy Feathers (“Feathers”), Richard A. Sheetz, Jr. (“Sheetz”), E. Marc Costanzo (“Costanzo”), and Frank Fina (“Fina”), four of whom are former high level employees of the Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania (“OAC”) and one of whom is a retired Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police. They have filed this action against

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-181 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE. [February 16, 2017] PER CURIAM. We have for consideration the regular-cycle report1 of The Florida Bar’s Code and Rules of Evidence Committee (Committee), concerning legislative changes to the Florida Evidence Code and to

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge, with whom McKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges, join. The plaintiffs in these cases are foreign agricultural workers who labored on banana plantations in Central and South America from the 1960

OPINION OF THE COURT ROTH, Circuit Judge: Michael K Leggett appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. He was convicted of assaulting a prison official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. Leggett makes three claims on appeal: (1) the district court erred in not ordering sua sponte a competency hearing before

■ FUENTES, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges Sloviter, Alito and Smith join, dissenting. In this case, the majority interprets the phrase “the trustee may,” in § 544(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, to mean that the trustee and a creditors’ committee may seek recovery under the statute. Although the majority does not conclude that the phrase is ambiguous or that its meaning is in any way obscure,

OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge. James Dennis has spent almost twenty-four years unsuccessfully challenging his conviction for the murder of Chedell Williams. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court repeatedly affirmed Dennis’s first-degree murder conviction and sentence and denied his applications for post-conviction relief. Thereafter, Dennis filed an application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the United States Distric

MEMORANDUM OPINION Per Curiam In this appeal, Carl Simon (“Simon”) challenges on numerous grounds the July 18, 2002 Order of the-Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dismissing his February *5352000 amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 5 V.I.C. § 1314. Joint Appendix (“JA”) 4. For the reasons that follow, Simon’s appeal wi

ORDER David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court This matter is. before the court upon the objection by plaintiff Angela Kristie Hey to the July 29, 2015, report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel (R & R). In the R. & R, the magistrate judge recommends that the court deny the motion for summary judgment by Hey and grant the motion for summary judgment by d

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgments, joined by FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. The Second Amendment secures an individual “right of the people” to keep and bear arms unconnected to service in the militia. District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 595, 128 S.Ct. 2788, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). This “pre-existi

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MONA GUNN, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 21-1187 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 22, 23, 31 : I

100 F.3d 1061 BARBARA R. SHERIDAN, Appellantv.E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, JACQUES AMBLARD No. 94-7509 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit Argued May 4, 1995Reargued en banc May 14, 1996Decided November 14, 1996 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delawar

QALLISTER, Justice: Plaintiff initiated this action to recover for the injuries she sustained while attending a high school football game.. She alleged that she fell from a bleacher, which was negligently maintained by defendant in a dangerous, unsafe, and neglected condition. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff’s claim was barred by the one-year limitation period provided in Section 63-30-15, U.C.A.

OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge: On March 9, 1994, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Johnson & Higgins (“J & H”), the employer of appellant Burt Sempier. Sempier now appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) claim, 29 U.S.C. § 623 (1988),

ACCEPTED 15-25-00003-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/6/2025 4:50 PM