Cases

13 N.Y.3d 1 (2009) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. INGVUE E. BUCHANAN, Appellant. Court of Appeals of New York. Argued May 7, 2009. Decided June 30, 2009. *2 Thomas Theophilos, Buffalo, for appellant. David W. Foley, District Attorney, Mayville (Lynn S. Hodgens of counsel), for resp

OPINION AND ORDER JANET T. NEFF, District Judge. Plaintiff filed this case against Defendant, alleging that Defendant sent her a debt collection letter that violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint under Fed. R.CrvP. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim (Dkt. 19). Plaintiff filed a response in opposi

491 F.Supp.2d 483 (2007) David J. BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. Thomas E. GAY, Thalia J. Gay, Honorable Jane M. Brady, Kristen S. Gibbons, Delaware State Police, Georgetown Police, Seaford Police, John Brady, Delaware Family Court of The State of Delaware, and The Firm of Stumpf Vickers & Sandy, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-711-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. J

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0006p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ ESTHER BUCHANAN, on behalf of herself and a ┐ class, │

MILBURN, Circuit Judge. David Buchanan appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), arguing that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a warrantless search of his residence. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. I. A

496 F.Supp.2d 715 (2007) BUCHANAN COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Plaintiff, v. Stuart Ray BLANKENSHIP, et al., Defendants. No. 1:05CV00066. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. August 3, 2007. *716 Steven R. Minor, Elliott Lawson & Minor, Bristol, VA, for Plaintiff. Kenneth Morris Hale, Defendant Pro Se.<

604 N.W.2d 667 (2000) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Ickey Lee BUCHANAN, Appellee. No. 99-133. Supreme Court of Iowa. January 20, 2000. *668 Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Karen Doland, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Ferguson, County Attorney, and Douglas Eichholz, Assistant County Attorney, for appellant. Linda

522 U.S. 269 (1998) BUCHANAN v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. No. 96-8400. United States Supreme Court. Argued November 3, 1997. Decided January 21, 1998. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT *270 Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Co

738 N.W.2d 636 (2007) EAST BUCHANAN TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, an Iowa Cooperative, Appellant, v. IOWA UTILITIES BOARD, a Division of the Iowa Department of Commerce, and U.S. Cellular Corporation, Qwest Corporation, and Office of Consumer Advocate, Appellees. No. 05-1212. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 14, 2007. *638 Thomas G. Fis

180 Ariz. 389 (1994) 884 P.2d 687 David P. WOHLSTROM, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Robert BUCHANAN, a Judge for the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Pima, Respondent, State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest. No. CV-92-0316-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona. November 3, 1994. *390 Stephen D. Ne

Appeal No. 7310 from Judgment dated March 18, 1994, Kosta N. Vlahos, Ruling Judge, Harrison County Circuit Court, Second Judicial District. Before FRAISER, C.J., and BARBER and DIAZ, JJ. Affirmed. BRIDGES, P.J., and COLEMAN, KING, McMILLIN, PAYNE and SOUTHWICK, JJ., concur. THOMAS, P.J., not participating.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge WILLIAMS concurred. Judge MICHAEL wrote a separate opinion concurring in part III and concurring in the judgment. *427OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Media General Operations and the New York Times Company appeal the district court’s S

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and

09/26/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 19, 2018 Session MARIA KALIS BUCHANAN v. RODNEY M. BUCHANAN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County No. 33116 Jean A. Stanley, Judge No. E2017-02364-COA-R3-CV In this divo

Dolliver, J. The certified question in this case stems from the Buchanans’ federal lawsuit against Defendants Simplot Feeders Limited Partnership (Simplot) and IBR Inc. (IBP). The lawsuit complains of manure dust, flies, and odors allegedly emanating from Defendants’ feedlot and meat processing plant adjacent to the Buchanans’ farm. *676Our summary of t

892 F.Supp. 190 (1995) BRB PRINTING, INC., a Michigan corporation, and Ben C. Maibach III, Plaintiffs, v. Vernon G. BUCHANAN, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 93-75204. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 2, 1995. *191 Thomas W.B. Porter & Joseph K. Erhardt, Dykema Gossett, Detroit, MI, for plaintiffs

878 F.Supp. 1049 (1995) BRB PRINTING, INC., a Michigan corporation, and Ben C. Maibach III, Plaintiffs, v. Vernon G. BUCHANAN, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 93-75204. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 6, 1995. *1050 Thomas W.B. Porter, Joseph K. Erhardt, Dykema, Gossett, Detroit, MI, for plaintiffs.</

698 S.E.2d 485 (2010) Kevin D. BUCHANAN, Executor of the Estate of Kelly Buchanan and Guardian of the property of Tiffany Hope Buchanan, a minor; Kevin David Buchanan, Individually; and Christopher Buchanan, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. Teresa Hagy BUCHANAN, Defendant. No. COA09-1085. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 7, 2010.

POSNER, Chief Judge. The government appeals for the second time from the judgment in favor of the taxpayers in this tax refund suit. After we dismissed the government’s initial appeal (along with the taxpayers’ cross-appeal from the refusal of the district court to impose sanctions on the government for alleged discovery abuses) because the district judge had not entered a final

MEMORANDUM OPINION SAVAGE, District Judge. In this qui tarn action brought under the *544False Claims Act (“FCA”)1 in which the government has declined to intervene, the defendant Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (“SMS”) has moved for summary judgment, arguing that the relator, William Thomas (“Th