Cases

KEATY, Judge. | defendant, Matthew Thomas Conway, appeals his conviction of second degree *1133murder. For the following reasons, we affirm. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In early 2011, Defendant was a habitual drug user and unemployed when he concocted a plan to rob the victim, Derek Desselle. The plan included a fake drug d

In related child custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Morales-Horowitz, J.), entered June 22, 2012, as, after a hearing, denied that branch of his petition which was to modify a prior order of the same court (Spitz, JH.O.) entered May 8, 2006, awarding sole physical custody of the parties’ child to the mother

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Michelle I. Schauer, J.), dated August 28, 2015. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of that court (Carol Ann Jordan, S.M.) dated March 24, 2015, which dismissed his petitions to modify the parties’ child support obligations. Ordered that the order dated August 28, 2015, is reversed, on the law and

*620 Appeals by the father from (1) an amended order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Carol Ann Jordan, S.M.), entered October 21, 2015, (2) an order of that court (Michelle I. Schauer, J.), entered May 18, 2016, and (3) a second order of that court (Michelle I. Schauer, J.) entered May 18, 2016. The amended order entered October

In related child custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Morales-Horowitz, J.), entered June 22, 2012, as, after a hearing, denied that branch of his petition which was to modify a prior order of the same court (Spitz, JH.O.) entered May 8, 2006, awarding sole physical custody of the parties’ child to the mother

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CONWAY ORLANDO THOMAS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-495 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed August 11,

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered [March 25, 2008, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Zimmerman, J.), entered March 17, 2009, which denied, without a hearing, his motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant moved for a downward modi

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).

*953In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Horowitz, J.), entered September 10, 2007, which granted his objections to so much of an order of the same court (Jordan, S.M.) entered July 12, 2007, as, after a hearing, directed him to pay the sum of $2,373 in monthly child support, only to the exten

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Apr 05 2016, 8:43 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals court exce

{Nature of Proceeding: Debtor’s Motion Directing Chapter 7 Trustee to Turnover Exempt Property} OPINION John J. Thomas, Bankruptcy Judge (CMS) This matter comes before me by way of a Motion filed by Debtor, Derek J. Anderson, requesting that I require the Chapter 7 Trustee, Mark Conway, turn over the sum of $12,725 to the Debtor as part of his claimed exemption. The facts presented to

DECISION and ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States Judge Before the Court is Plaintiff Joseph Williams’ motion for class certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff alleges Defendant Onondaga County Justice Center discriminated against him because of his disability in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132 et seq., Sectio

In two related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Spitz, J.H.O.), entered May 8, 2006, as, after a hearing, granted the mother’s petition for sole custody of the subject child and established a visitation schedule for him, and (2) so much of an order of the same court dated October 4, 2006, as denied his motion fo

ORDER HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter appears before the Court on Defendant Carl Sims’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [94]) and Defendants R.L. “Butch” Conway’s and Don Pinkard’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [95]). I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The above-named Plaintiffs have filed a Complaint, as amended, alleging a

ORDER STEVE C. JONES, District Judge. This matter appears before the Court on Defendant Carl Sims’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [94]) and Defendants R.L. “Butch” Conway’s and Don Pinkard’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [95]). I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The above-named Plaintiffs have filed a Complaint, as amended, alleging a Fourteenth Amend

MINER, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Icahn & Co., Inc. (“Icahn”) appeals from a money judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant Thomas Conway in the sum of $357,240 with interest, entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Ward, J.) following a jury trial. Conway maintained an accou

IN RE: JOHN EDWARD CONWAY and KATHLEEN PATRICIA McGURKIN, Chapter 7, Debtors, Estate of THOMAS SUMMERLIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN EDWARD CONWAY and KATHLEEN PATRICIA McGURKIN, Defendants. Case No. 05-22687 (ASD), Adv. Pro. No. 06-02004, Re: Doc. I.D. No. 72. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. November 16, 2009. Stuart H. Caplan, Esq. Law Offices of Neil Crane, LLC, 2700 Whitney

RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice hA class of police officers and firefighters brought a class-action complaint against their employer, the City of Conway. The class alleged that the City breached its employment contract with them when it failed to allocate sales-tax revenues to fund salary increases. The issue before us now is the circuit court’s order c

By Judge Norman A. Thomas At the close of the final pretrial conference hearing on November 18, 2011, the Court agreed to farther consider the following issue, whether Omega Protein, Inc., owed Robert E. Conway a legal duty, under general maritime standards applicable to the commercial fishing industry, to perform a job hazard analysis regarding vessel to vessel ingress and egress? The plaintiff previously sought to base imp

MULLINS, Judge. Timothy Conway appeals the conviction entered following his Alford plea 1 to the charge of possession of a controlled substance, third or subsequent offense. The following facts can be gleaned from the minutes of evidence. On or about January 1, 2017, a vehicle in which