Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “The Stephan Co.”
The Stephan Co. v. FAULDING HEALTHCAREpublic domain
844 So.2d 676 (2003) THE STEPHAN COMPANY, Old 97 Company, and Frank F. Ferola, Appellants, v. FAULDING HEALTHCARE (IP) HOLDINGS, INC., and Faulding Consumer, Inc., Appellees. No. 4D02-2889. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 16, 2003. Rehearing Denied May 30, 2003. *677 Curtis Carlson and
Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Stephanpublic domain
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND OTHER RELIEF TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc., d/b/a AT & T Indiana’s (“AT & T”) request for review of an Arbitration Order and resultant Interconnection Agreement issued by Defendants Carol Stephan, Caroline R. Mays-Medley, Jim Huston, Angela Weber, and David E. Z
Stephan v. Ruddick Corp.public domain
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties and their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Glenn.
New Image Laboratories, Inc. v. Stephan Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM ** The Stephan Co. and Stephan Distributing, Inc. (collectively “Stephan”) appeal the order of the district court granting partial summary judgment against them and in favor of New Image Laboratories, Inc., (“New Image”) on New Image’s claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. New Image cross appeals the partial summary judgment granted in fa
Stephan v. Wacasterpublic domain
[Cite as Stephan v. Wacaster, 2025-Ohio-565.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY RICK STEPHAN, SR., ET AL. : : Appellees : C.A. No. 2024-CA-19 : v.
Stephan v. Hoops Construction Co.public domain
771 P.2d 912 (1989) 115 Idaho 894 Tom STEPHAN, personal representative of the Estate of William F. Hoops, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOOPS CONSTRUCTION CO., an Idaho Corporation, Defendant-Respondent, and Angela R. Hoops, Intervening Defendant-Respondent. No. 17024. Supreme Court of Idaho. April 7, 1989.
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Kent M. Frandsen David K. Herzog Michael L. Schultz Jane Dall Wilson Lebanon, Indiana Katrina Gossett Indianapolis, Indiana Karl L. Mulvaney Nana Quay-Smith Stanley E. Karon Indianapolis, Indiana Richfiel
Stephan v. Selvic Marine Towing Co.public domain
201 Ill. App.3d 554 (1990) 559 N.E.2d 147 DONALD J. STEPHAN, Adm'r of the Estate of William W. Stephan, Deceased, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SELVIC MARINE TOWING COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-89-1093. Illinois Appellate Court First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed July 18, 1990. *555<
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Kent M. Frandsen David K. Herzog Michael L. Schultz Jane Dall Wilson Lebanon, Indiana Katrina Gossett Stanley E. Karon Karl L. Mulvaney Indianapolis, Indiana Nana Quay-Smith Indianapolis, Indiana
Conte & Co., Inc. v. Stephanpublic domain
713 F.Supp. 1382 (1989) CONTE & COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Robert T. STEPHAN, Attorney General of the State of Kansas, Defendant. No. 88-4033-R. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 3, 1989. *1383 Randy L. Baird, Topeka, Kan., Frank J. Shannon, III, Henritze & Shannon, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff. Nancy L
In Re the Contempt of the Supreme Court of Indianapublic domain
683 N.E.2d 236 (1997) In the Matter of the CONTEMPT OF the Supreme Court of Indiana, Stephan J. LUSTINA, Respondent. No. 45S00-9703-CO-171. Supreme Court of Indiana. July 21, 1997. *237 PER CURIAM. This matter comes before this Court on an Order to Appear and Show Cause directing the respondent, Stephan J. Lustina, to appea
Stephan Duwayne White v. Walter Cheekpublic domain
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., RICKMAN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS CO
Hildebrandt v. Stephanpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Curran, J. Plaintiff has moved for an order compelling defendant to appear for “an additional 4-hour session” of his deposition. Defendant opposes this request essentially on the grounds that plaintiff has waived any further deposition session by expressly consenting to the conclusion of the deposition. At the initial oral argument on the motion, the court as
Stephan v. Statepublic domain
[Cite as Stephan v. State, 2015-Ohio-4516.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY ROBERT L. STEPHAN, et al. : : Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO. 2015-CA-15 : v.
Stephan Lajuan Beasley, Sr. v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 26, 2014 STEPHAN LAJUAN BEASLEY, SR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 264368 Don W. Poole, Judge No. E2013-00695-CCA-R3-CO - Filed June 2, 2014 The Petitioner, Stephan Lajuan Beasley, Sr., was convicted by a jury of first degree premedita
Berger v. Stephanpublic domain
250 P.3d 954 (2011) 241 Or. App. 399 Freidrich BERGER and Erika Berger, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Rudiger STEPHAN, aka Stephan Ruediger; and Kristine Berger Benks, aka Berger Kristine Binks, aka Kristine Berger-Benks, Defendants-Appellants, and Tanya Berger-Caudle, Defendant. 05CV0036; A141558. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued an
Allen v. Stephan Co.public domain
784 So.2d 456 (2000) C. Robert ALLEN, III, Charles R. Allen, IV, and Grace Allen, Appellants, v. The STEPHAN CO., Scientific Research Products, Inc. of Delaware, John Allen, Frederick R. Phelan, Sam A. Lazar, Henry Miltenberg, and Sobel, Hunter, Glackman & Sobel, P.A., Appellees. No. 4D99-1061. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 8, 2000.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VRATIL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Retax Costs (Doc. # 249) filed September 28, 1993. On July 2, 1993, the Court granted the motion for summary judgment of defendant Belger Cartage Service, Inc. On September 21, 1993, the Clerk of the District Court taxed costs against plaintiff in the amount of $12,217.48. Plaintiff seeks review
Stephan Gonzalez v. Stephanie Gonzalezpublic domain
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed December 29, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01361-CV STEPHAN GONZALEZ, JESSIE GONZALEZ, AND LENA MARTINEZ D/B/A MARTINEZ OFFICE SOLUTIONS AND NOTARY SERVICES, Appellants V. STEPHANIE GONZALEZ, Appellee On
State of Tennessee Stephan Lajuan Beasley, Sr.public domain
06/26/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEPHAN LAJUAN BEASLEY, SR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 199784 Don W. Poole, Judge No. E2015-02528-CCA-R3-CD The pro se appellant, Stephan Lajuan Beasley, Sr., appeals as o