⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “The State of Nevada v. United States Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service”

District Court, D. Wyoming · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 136 F. Supp. 3d 1317; 2015 WL 5845145
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Scott W. Skavdahl, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the motions for preliminary injunction filed by the various Petitioners and Intervenor-Petitioners: Motion for Preliminary Injunction of Petitioners Independent Petroleum Association of America (“IPAÁ”) and Western Energy Alliance (“Alliance”) (hereinafte
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-07-05 · Published · cited 1× · 195 F. Supp. 3d 327; 118 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5054; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86618; 2016 WL 3661115
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ronald Leroy Satterlee has brought this action against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the'State of California Franchise Tax Board (“Tax Board”), First Home Savings Bank (“First Home Bank”), and Granite Services International Inc. (“Granite Services”), alleging that defend
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2017-02-08 · Published · cited 3× · 231 F. Supp. 3d 152; 2017 WL 514424; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17619
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M. G. LYNN, CHIEF JUDGE Before the Court are the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 48, 51, 54, 67). On November 17, 2016, the Court held oral argument on the Motions. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014-03-24 · Published · cited 28× · 437 Md. 492; 87 A.3d 1263
ADKINS, J. Benjamin Franklin once wrote that “nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” 1 But Mr. Franklin did not promise certainty about what could be taxed or by whom. This case allows us to bring such certainty to a particular creature in the modern cor
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2014-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 120 F. Supp. 3d 1190; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185338; 2014 WL 10962253
ORDER LEE R. WEST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Since the Treaty of Hopewell was signed on January 3, 1786, by The Choctaw Nation (“Choctaw Nation”) and on January 10, 1786, by The Chickasaw Nation (“Chickasaw Nation”), wherein the United States of America acknowledged that the Choctaw Nation and the Chickasaw Nation were “to be under-[its] protection,” 7 Stat. 21, Article 2; e.g,,
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00002-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/27/2025 7:05 PM No. 15-25-00002-CV CHRISTOPHE
Nevada Supreme Court · 2016-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 NV 73
132 Nev., Advance Opinion 73 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAN SCHWARTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL No. 69611 CAPACITY AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, Appellant, vs. FL HELLEN QUAN LOPEZ, SEP 29 2096 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF RACIE K. LINDEMAN HER MINO
Nevada Supreme Court · 2016-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 NV 73
132 Nev., Advance Opinion 73 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAN SCHWARTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL No. 69611 CAPACITY AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, Appellant, vs. FL HELLEN QUAN LOPEZ, SEP 29 2096 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF RACIE K. LINDEMAN HER MINO
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009-07-24 · Published · cited 246× · 291 S.W.3d 873; 2009 Tenn. LEXIS 361
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 7, 2008 Session STEVEN WATERS ET AL. v. REAGAN FARR, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section Chancery Court for Loudon County No. 10710 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00123-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 5:17 PM NO. 15-25-00123-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00123-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 7:25 PM NO. 15-25-00123-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00113-CV 5989837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/8/2015
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 5431694 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 2:31 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:55 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-13 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/13/2025 11:51 AM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CL
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021-07-20 · Published · cited 27× · 5 F.4th 1100
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 20, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 3923343 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/27/20
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-12-15 · Published · cited 60× · 391 F.3d 1377; 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 502; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25943; 2004 WL 2901099
DYK, Circuit Judge. Petitioner John E. White (‘White”) petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”), which rejected his whistleblow-ing claim, finding that White did not have a reasonable belief that he was disclosing gross mismanagement. White v. Dep’t of the Air Force, 95 M.S.P.R. 1 (2003). We affirm.