Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York, et al.”
Amandola v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr.public domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, St. Patrick’s School, and Reverend Ellsworth R. Walden appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Martin, J.), dated June 6, 2013, as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of
Monaghan v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr.public domain
Monaghan v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr. (2018 NY Slip Op 06527) Monaghan v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr. 2018 NY Slip Op 06527 Decided on October 3, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Publ
A. N. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr.public domain
A. N. v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr. (2018 NY Slip Op 06872) A. N. v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr. 2018 NY Slip Op 06872 Decided on October 17, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published
MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, District Judge: Plaintiff, The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York (the “Diocese”) asserts claims against Defendants, The Incorporated Village of Old Westbury (the “Village”), its Board of Trustees, and various individual Village trustees and officials, challenging the Village’s imposition of restrictions, pursuant to its “Places of Worship”
Catholic Health Care System v. Burwellpublic domain
POOLER, Circuit Judge: Defendants-Appellants, the Secretaries of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury, appeal from the December 16, 2013 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Cogan, J.) which, in *210 relevant part, granted
Aprile-Sci v. St. Raymond of Penyafort R.C. Churchpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (John M. Galasso, J.), entered March 4, 2015. The order denied the defendant’s motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
Bisignano v. Raabepublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marber, J.), entered March 11, 2013, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants St. Rose of Lima Church and Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted again
Rosario v Our Lady of Consolation Nursing & Rehabilitation Care Ctr. (2020 NY Slip Op 04983) Rosario v Our Lady of Consolation Nursing & Rehabilitation Care Ctr. 2020 NY Slip Op 04983 Decided on September 16, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiffs bring challenges to certain zoning and environmental ordinances enacted by Defendant Village of Pomona (the “Village”), alleging they are unlawful under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Aet of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), 42
Blecher v. Holy Seepublic domain
22-2840 Blecher v. Holy See In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 (Argued: September 13, 2023 Decided: July 24, 2025) Docket No. 22-2840 ERIK BLECHER, JAMES BRUNO, ROBERT BURNS, EMMETT CALDWELL, LOUIS CASTIGLIO
In re Eichnerpublic domain
*434OPINION OF THE COURT Mollen, P. J. This appeal concerns the right of a terminally patient in a comatose and essentially vegetative staté to have extraordinary life-sustaining measures discontinued, and thereby to permit the process of death to run its natural course. The case raises issues which involve not only the life of the patient, but the in