⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. M&M Installations, Inc.”

District Court, S.D. New York · 2007-02-26 · Published · cited 1× · 476 F. Supp. 2d 387; 181 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3135; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18417; 2007 WL 646306
476 F.Supp.2d 387 (2007) MI INSTALLERS AND FURNITURE SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, the New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, the New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, the New York City District Council of Carpenters Apprenticeship, Journeyman Training, Education, and Industry Fund, the New York City District Council of Carpenters Charity Fund,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-07-03 · Published · cited 1× · 29 F. Supp. 3d 373; 2014 WL 2990918; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91063
OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: This is the latest round in a long-running dispute between Triumph Construction Corporation, here the petitioner in an effort to stay permanently an arbitration, and the New York City District Council of Carpenters (the “Union”) and its associated fringe benefit funds (the “Funds”) (collectively, “Respondents”), here seeking to enforce vi
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 382 F. Supp. 3d 1134
Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Marine Carpenters Pension Fund and Pacific Coast Shipyards Pension Fund's (the Funds) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, an Order to Pay, and Injunctive Relief. Dkt. #19. This dispute originated when Puglia Engineering, Inc., purchased all the stock of San Francisco Ship Repair, Inc. (SFSR),
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014-12-17 · Published · cited 16× · 68 F. Supp. 3d 545; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174101; 2014 WL 7205331
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge. Contents I. INTRODUCTION.547 II.BACKGROUND.549 A. Rule 56.1 Statements.549 B. Factual Background.549 1. Governance Structure of ACHA and ACIC.. •..550 2. 1994 ACHA Agreement with Local 1578 .550 •3. Demand for Payment of Withdrawal Liability.551 C
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 571 F. Supp. 2d 555; 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3198; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61561; 2008 WL 3275532
571 F.Supp.2d 555 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT COUNCIL OF NEW YORK CITY AND VICINITY OF THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. No. 90 Civ. 5722(CSH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 8, 2008. *556 Benjamin H. Torrance, Edward Scarvalone, Lisa
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018-05-23 · Published · cited 2× · 324 F. Supp. 3d 293
Stefan R. Underhill, United States District Judge This case involves a "turf battle" between two sets of construction organizations. The defendant, New England Regional Council of Carpenters (the *297"Carpenters"), has entered into collective bargaining agreements ("CBAs") with non-party construction companies and construction managers (collect
District Court, E.D. New York · 2017-09-12 · Published · cited 72× · 270 F. Supp. 3d 593
MEMORANDUM & ORDER HURLEY, Senior District Judge:.. Presently before the Court is the August 25, 2017 Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson recommending that plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment be granted in part and denied in part. More particularly, Judge Tomlinson recommended that (1) default judgment b
District Court, S.D. New York · 1996-09-12 · Published · cited 3× · 941 F. Supp. 349; 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2281; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13398; 1996 WL 520907
941 F.Supp. 349 (1996) UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT COUNCIL OF NEW YORK CITY and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, et al., Defendants. No. 90 Civ. 5722 (CSH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 12, 1996. *350 *351
District Court, E.D. New York · 2015-08-18 · Published · cited 3× · 124 F. Supp. 3d 187; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108929; 2015 WL 4925170
ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge. On September 19, 2014, plaintiffs Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers’ National Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Energy Management Institute Committee for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry, Trustees of the Sheet Metal Occupational Health Institute Trust, Trustees of the International- Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air. Conditioning Industry,
District Court, D. Colorado · 1985-08-13 · Published · cited 6× · 615 F. Supp. 1063; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16876
615 F.Supp. 1063 (1985) CENTENNIAL STATE CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WOODWORKERS OF DENVER, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 84-K-762. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 13, 1985. *1064 Pamela Martin, Lakewood, Colo., for plaintiffs. Robert R. Miller and Kate Raabe, Stettner, Miller &am;
District Court, District of Columbia · 1984-01-19 · Published · cited 19× · 578 F. Supp. 1222; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20260
578 F.Supp. 1222 (1984) DORN'S TRANSPORTATION, INC., Oneida Motor Freight, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, BENEFIT PLAN A, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 82-1141. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 19, 1984. *1223 *1224 Linda High, Washington, D.C., for plai
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983-09-09 · Published · cited 6× · 718 F.2d 628; 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2057
WINTER, Chief Judge: The principal issue in these cross appeals is the constitutionality of the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (1980 Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq., which became effective September 26, 1980 but which provided liability for complete or partial employer withdrawal from a multiemployer pension plan retroactive to April 29, 1980. § 1461(e)(2)(A). The constitutionality of the 1980 Act
District Court, C.D. California · 1988-10-24 · Published · cited 7× · 697 F. Supp. 1538; 1988 WL 109618
697 F.Supp. 1538 (1988) TRUSTEES OF the CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN NUGGET, INC., a Nevada corporation; and The Palmieri Company, a California corporation, Defendants. No. CV 85-2366-AAH (Px). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 20, 1988. As Corrected October 24, 1988.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994-08-18 · Published · cited 6× · 33 F.3d 145
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: We review on this appeal a special proviso inserted in a federal statute to preserve certain union practices believed helpful in combating the blight of sweatshops in the garment industry. Sweatshops may be defined as businesses that regularly violate wage, child labor, safety and health laws. These establishments, which pay workers below living wages for long hours of work under intolerable conditi
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983-09-09 · Published · cited 85× · 718 F.2d 628; 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2057; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24103
718 F.2d 628 4 Employee Benefits Ca 2057 REPUBLIC INDUSTRIES, INC., a Del. Corp., Appellant,v.TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO. 83 OF VIRGINIA PENSION FUND, anunincorporated assoc., Appellee.Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Amicus Curiae.REPUBLIC INDUSTRIES, INC., a Del. Corp., Appellee,v.TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO. 83 OF VIRGINIA PENSION FUND, anunincorporated assoc., Appellant.Pension Bene
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-02-18 · Published · cited 32× · 88 F. Supp. 3d 250; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1506; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19281; 2015 WL 690811
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. The Plaintiffs in this action — several local unions and related benefit funds — filed suit in June 2012 against Defendants Car-Win Construction, Inc. (“Car-Win”) and CRV Precast Construction, LLC (“CRV” and, collectively, “Defendants”). In their Complaint, Plaintiffs asserted numerous violations of a collective bargainin
District Court, D. Delaware · 1989-02-06 · Published · cited 3× · 704 F. Supp. 1277; 10 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1882; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1050; 1989 WL 8730
704 F.Supp. 1277 (1989) The FLYING TIGER LINE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 86-304-CMW. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 6, 1989. *1278 *1279 R. Franklin Balotti, Jesse A. Finkelstein
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2016-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-16-00761-CV 1380026
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013-12-05 · Published · cited 2× · 504 B.R. 97; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 5701; 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 237; 2013 WL 6331931
Opinion Regarding Eligibilitg STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. The Congress shall have Power To ... establish ... uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.... Article I, Section 8, United States Constitution No ... law impairing the obligation of contract shall be enacted. Article I, Section 10, Michigan
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013-12-20 · Published · cited 1× · 504 B.R. 191; 2013 WL 6834647; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 5380; 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 269
Memorandum Regarding: I. Certification Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) (2) (A) (i) II. Recommendation on Whether Direct Appeals Should Be Authorized and III. Parties’ Request to Recommend Expedited Consideration of Appeals STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Summary Under